The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The Validity and Applicability of the Revised Delirium Rating Scale (DRS-R98) for Delirium Severity Assessment in a Critical Care Setting

The Validity and Applicability of the Revised Delirium Rating Scale (DRS-R98) for Delirium Severity Assessment in a Critical Care Setting
The Validity and Applicability of the Revised Delirium Rating Scale (DRS-R98) for Delirium Severity Assessment in a Critical Care Setting

Background: Delirium is a neuropsychiatric syndrome common in critical illness. Worsening delirium severity is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, yet its assessment remains under-reported with most severity assessment tools not validated for critical care. The DRS-R98 is a widely applied and validated tool. The aim of this project is to report the validation and utility of the DRS-R98 in critical illness. Methods: This prospective, cohort study was conducted in adults with delirium admitted to a critical care unit and predicted to stay for ≥ 24 h. We excluded patients with severe neurological or communication barriers that would have interfered with the DRS-R98 assessment. Patients were screened using a delirium detection algorithm and the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Eligible patient informations were collected and reported to qualified assessor/s before visiting clinical areas, confirming delirium presence and undertaking DRS- R98 assessments. To assess the tool's construct validity, an intensivist completed the Clinical Global Impression-Scale (CGI-S). To calculate the inter-rater reliability (IRR) a subset of patients were simultaneously evaluated by two assessors. Results: We assessed 22 patients, 73% were male, with a median age of 65 years (IQR14). The DRS -R98 mean (SD) severity score was 24 (+/-7.7), total scale was 29 (+/18.0), and CGI-S 3.5 (+/11.5). Assessment duration was 90 min (+/-55) and 15 min (+/-5) for record data extraction and clinical assessment respectively. The CGI-S significantly correlated with DRS-R98 severity (r = 0.626) and total (r = 0.628) scales. The DRS-R98 Cronbach's alpha was 0.896 for severity scale and 0.886 for total scale. The inter-rater reliability (IRR) was assessed in six patients and reported an inter-correlation coefficient of 0.505 (p = 0.124) and 0.565 (p = 0.93) for the severity and total scale respectively. Conclusions: In critical care, the Delirium Rating Scale R98 had good construct validity, excellent internal consistency, and moderate inter-rater reliability.

critical care, delirium, intensive care, severity, validation
0885-0666
8850666231199986
Almuhairi, Eiman Saeed
98b98f53-6995-4fc6-ae42-8897b6e216b0
Badejo, Monica
e638dc4d-a1cc-445c-a210-acd82a7d3a3a
Peer, Aneesa
f9781b2a-3674-4dc0-9d1a-4a4e63ec2346
Pitkanen, Mervi
8e63dfb1-745f-44c9-8711-c4866be3a5ea
McKenzie, Cathrine A.
ec344dee-5777-49c5-970e-6326e82c9f8c
Almuhairi, Eiman Saeed
98b98f53-6995-4fc6-ae42-8897b6e216b0
Badejo, Monica
e638dc4d-a1cc-445c-a210-acd82a7d3a3a
Peer, Aneesa
f9781b2a-3674-4dc0-9d1a-4a4e63ec2346
Pitkanen, Mervi
8e63dfb1-745f-44c9-8711-c4866be3a5ea
McKenzie, Cathrine A.
ec344dee-5777-49c5-970e-6326e82c9f8c

Almuhairi, Eiman Saeed, Badejo, Monica, Peer, Aneesa, Pitkanen, Mervi and McKenzie, Cathrine A. (2023) The Validity and Applicability of the Revised Delirium Rating Scale (DRS-R98) for Delirium Severity Assessment in a Critical Care Setting. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 8850666231199986. (doi:10.1177/08850666231199986).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Delirium is a neuropsychiatric syndrome common in critical illness. Worsening delirium severity is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, yet its assessment remains under-reported with most severity assessment tools not validated for critical care. The DRS-R98 is a widely applied and validated tool. The aim of this project is to report the validation and utility of the DRS-R98 in critical illness. Methods: This prospective, cohort study was conducted in adults with delirium admitted to a critical care unit and predicted to stay for ≥ 24 h. We excluded patients with severe neurological or communication barriers that would have interfered with the DRS-R98 assessment. Patients were screened using a delirium detection algorithm and the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Eligible patient informations were collected and reported to qualified assessor/s before visiting clinical areas, confirming delirium presence and undertaking DRS- R98 assessments. To assess the tool's construct validity, an intensivist completed the Clinical Global Impression-Scale (CGI-S). To calculate the inter-rater reliability (IRR) a subset of patients were simultaneously evaluated by two assessors. Results: We assessed 22 patients, 73% were male, with a median age of 65 years (IQR14). The DRS -R98 mean (SD) severity score was 24 (+/-7.7), total scale was 29 (+/18.0), and CGI-S 3.5 (+/11.5). Assessment duration was 90 min (+/-55) and 15 min (+/-5) for record data extraction and clinical assessment respectively. The CGI-S significantly correlated with DRS-R98 severity (r = 0.626) and total (r = 0.628) scales. The DRS-R98 Cronbach's alpha was 0.896 for severity scale and 0.886 for total scale. The inter-rater reliability (IRR) was assessed in six patients and reported an inter-correlation coefficient of 0.505 (p = 0.124) and 0.565 (p = 0.93) for the severity and total scale respectively. Conclusions: In critical care, the Delirium Rating Scale R98 had good construct validity, excellent internal consistency, and moderate inter-rater reliability.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 September 2023
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023.
Keywords: critical care, delirium, intensive care, severity, validation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 482304
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/482304
ISSN: 0885-0666
PURE UUID: 9546c61f-7a34-4dd0-8dbb-ab53158836bc
ORCID for Cathrine A. McKenzie: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-9711

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Sep 2023 16:41
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Eiman Saeed Almuhairi
Author: Monica Badejo
Author: Aneesa Peer
Author: Mervi Pitkanen
Author: Cathrine A. McKenzie ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×