The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The capabilities of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities under personalisation: A qualitative analysis of work, learning and social inclusion

The capabilities of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities under personalisation: A qualitative analysis of work, learning and social inclusion
The capabilities of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities under personalisation: A qualitative analysis of work, learning and social inclusion
Statistics suggest that employment is inaccessible to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. This creates a social, spatial and experiential divide that limits opportunities for social participation and learning. In the UK as elsewhere, social care is framed by ‘personalisation’ policy, which aspires to support personal autonomy yet is associated with a cost-cutting agenda and fragmented provision. The option to employ a Personal Assistant (PA) might support social participation.
The conceptual framework for this study is the capability approach, chosen for its focus on the practical opportunities available to people to achieve a life they have reason to value. Building on sociocultural learning theories, the study links work, learning, and social participation or ‘inclusion’. It explores how learning arising through social participation might enhance the capabilities of the people concerned.
Video-supported qualitative methods were used. Five young people with intellectual and developmental disabilities took part, each employing a PA and working in a context matching their preferences. For each, a parent, a co-worker or supervisor and the PA took part. Young people were filmed at work. This video supported recall and reflection in semi-structured discussion with participants. Video and discussion content was analysed by case, then thematically, in an iterative process.
PA support opened opportunities for social participation outside domestic and disability settings. The contribution of personalisation was ambivalent. People found work through bottom-up initiatives outside ‘social care’ parameters and in implicit challenge to them. Joint negotiation of preferences and opportunities resulted in unpaid work in not-for-profit contexts. Working this way enhanced the capabilities of young people to differing degrees. Collaborative relationships between young people, PAs and people in the workplace underpinned reciprocal learning processes, shown in themes of effort and recognition, mutual adaptation and affiliation. Findings for participatory learning were significant against a backdrop of substantial constraints on young people’s opportunities. This study challenges conceptions of autonomy as solo performance and social norms that delegitimise work outside employment both of which can impede access to participation and reciprocal learning in public settings.
intellecual and developmental disability, autism, learning, capabilities, personalisation, social inclusion, social participation
University of Southampton
Croydon, Abigail Elizabeth
Croydon, Abigail Elizabeth
Nind, Melanie
b1e294c7-0014-483e-9320-e2a0346dffef
Power, (Andy)
b3a1ee09-e381-413a-88ac-7cb3e13b3acc

Croydon, Abigail Elizabeth (2023) The capabilities of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities under personalisation: A qualitative analysis of work, learning and social inclusion. Southampton Education School, Doctoral Thesis, 255pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Statistics suggest that employment is inaccessible to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. This creates a social, spatial and experiential divide that limits opportunities for social participation and learning. In the UK as elsewhere, social care is framed by ‘personalisation’ policy, which aspires to support personal autonomy yet is associated with a cost-cutting agenda and fragmented provision. The option to employ a Personal Assistant (PA) might support social participation.
The conceptual framework for this study is the capability approach, chosen for its focus on the practical opportunities available to people to achieve a life they have reason to value. Building on sociocultural learning theories, the study links work, learning, and social participation or ‘inclusion’. It explores how learning arising through social participation might enhance the capabilities of the people concerned.
Video-supported qualitative methods were used. Five young people with intellectual and developmental disabilities took part, each employing a PA and working in a context matching their preferences. For each, a parent, a co-worker or supervisor and the PA took part. Young people were filmed at work. This video supported recall and reflection in semi-structured discussion with participants. Video and discussion content was analysed by case, then thematically, in an iterative process.
PA support opened opportunities for social participation outside domestic and disability settings. The contribution of personalisation was ambivalent. People found work through bottom-up initiatives outside ‘social care’ parameters and in implicit challenge to them. Joint negotiation of preferences and opportunities resulted in unpaid work in not-for-profit contexts. Working this way enhanced the capabilities of young people to differing degrees. Collaborative relationships between young people, PAs and people in the workplace underpinned reciprocal learning processes, shown in themes of effort and recognition, mutual adaptation and affiliation. Findings for participatory learning were significant against a backdrop of substantial constraints on young people’s opportunities. This study challenges conceptions of autonomy as solo performance and social norms that delegitimise work outside employment both of which can impede access to participation and reciprocal learning in public settings.

Text
Capabilitiesthesisuploadarchive - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (7MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Ms-Abigail-Croydon
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.

More information

Published date: September 2023
Keywords: intellecual and developmental disability, autism, learning, capabilities, personalisation, social inclusion, social participation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 482343
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/482343
PURE UUID: d14a9548-9d16-4120-bbde-eb864015eaf4
ORCID for Melanie Nind: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4070-7513
ORCID for (Andy) Power: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3887-1050

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Sep 2023 16:37
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:18

Export record

Contributors

Author: Abigail Elizabeth Croydon
Thesis advisor: Melanie Nind ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: (Andy) Power ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×