Investigating L2 writing processes across independent and integrated tasks: a mixed-methods study
Investigating L2 writing processes across independent and integrated tasks: a mixed-methods study
Most research into second language (L2) writing has focused on the products of writing tasks; much less empirical work has examined the behaviours in which L2 writers engage and the cognitive processes that underlie writing behaviours. We aimed to fill this gap by investigating the extent to which writing speed fluency, pausing, eye-gaze behaviours and the cognitive processes associated with pausing may vary across independent and integrated tasks throughout the whole, and at five different stages, of the writing process. Sixty L2 writers performed two independent and two integrated TOEFL iBT writing tasks counterbalanced across participants. While writing, we logged participants’ keystrokes and captured their eye-movements. Participants took part in a stimulated recall interview based on the last task they had completed. Mixed effects regressions and qualitative analyses revealed that, apart from source use on the integrated task, L2 writers engaged in similar writing behaviours and cognitive processes during the independent and integrated tasks. The integrated task, however, elicited more dynamic and varied behaviours and cognitive processes across writing stages. Adopting a mixed-methods approach enabled us to gain more complete and specific insights than using a single method.
eye-tracking, key-stroke logging, listen–read–write task, stimulated recall, TOEFL iBT, writing processes
307-334
Michel, Marije
681656b9-66ff-4c52-b690-a77609984836
Révész, Andrea
c000d694-d05e-41fd-b969-453173b25226
Lu, Xiaojun
3dd4bfc3-5486-454c-92f3-bc4575b068dc
Kourtali, Nektaria Efstathia
7697d0cb-ba9a-455b-909e-dedd76c1b10b
Lee, Minjin
314c78fc-fdf7-43a1-9059-e6802d063f56
Borges, Lais
d0747ee4-5d54-46c5-8bbd-d1b66f0f92af
1 July 2020
Michel, Marije
681656b9-66ff-4c52-b690-a77609984836
Révész, Andrea
c000d694-d05e-41fd-b969-453173b25226
Lu, Xiaojun
3dd4bfc3-5486-454c-92f3-bc4575b068dc
Kourtali, Nektaria Efstathia
7697d0cb-ba9a-455b-909e-dedd76c1b10b
Lee, Minjin
314c78fc-fdf7-43a1-9059-e6802d063f56
Borges, Lais
d0747ee4-5d54-46c5-8bbd-d1b66f0f92af
Michel, Marije, Révész, Andrea, Lu, Xiaojun, Kourtali, Nektaria Efstathia, Lee, Minjin and Borges, Lais
(2020)
Investigating L2 writing processes across independent and integrated tasks: a mixed-methods study.
Second Language Research, 36 (3), .
(doi:10.1177/0267658320915501).
Abstract
Most research into second language (L2) writing has focused on the products of writing tasks; much less empirical work has examined the behaviours in which L2 writers engage and the cognitive processes that underlie writing behaviours. We aimed to fill this gap by investigating the extent to which writing speed fluency, pausing, eye-gaze behaviours and the cognitive processes associated with pausing may vary across independent and integrated tasks throughout the whole, and at five different stages, of the writing process. Sixty L2 writers performed two independent and two integrated TOEFL iBT writing tasks counterbalanced across participants. While writing, we logged participants’ keystrokes and captured their eye-movements. Participants took part in a stimulated recall interview based on the last task they had completed. Mixed effects regressions and qualitative analyses revealed that, apart from source use on the integrated task, L2 writers engaged in similar writing behaviours and cognitive processes during the independent and integrated tasks. The integrated task, however, elicited more dynamic and varied behaviours and cognitive processes across writing stages. Adopting a mixed-methods approach enabled us to gain more complete and specific insights than using a single method.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 July 2020
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
The author disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was funded by Educational Testing Service (ETS) under a Committee of Examiners and the Test of English as a Foreign Language research grant. ETS does not discount or endorse the methodology, results, implications, or opinions presented by the researchers.
Funding Information:
We would like to thank the Educational Testing Service (ETS) for providing financial support to carry out the project on which this study is based. We are also grateful to ETS, and John Norris in particular, for constructive feedback and practical support at various stages of the project. In addition, we would like to thank Khaled Barkaoui for sharing his typing test and Ana Pellicer-Sánchez for advice on eye-tracking issues.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
Keywords:
eye-tracking, key-stroke logging, listen–read–write task, stimulated recall, TOEFL iBT, writing processes
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 482435
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/482435
ISSN: 0267-6583
PURE UUID: ed892d1d-5692-4646-9817-2d3c1c28908b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Oct 2023 16:42
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:16
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Marije Michel
Author:
Andrea Révész
Author:
Xiaojun Lu
Author:
Nektaria Efstathia Kourtali
Author:
Minjin Lee
Author:
Lais Borges
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics