Birth family health history: adopters’ perspectives on learning about their child’s health inheritance
Birth family health history: adopters’ perspectives on learning about their child’s health inheritance
Birth family health history is shared with prospective adopters to help them understand a child's future health risks. But guidelines for health professionals indicate that such third-party information should not be shared without the consent of birth parents. In practice this can be difficult to achieve. Catherine Hill and Maria Edwards' survey of 57 adoptions sought to explore the views and experiences of adopters about the value of this information to both themselves and their child. Absence of information, particularly with respect to paternal history, was common and resulted in adverse consequences for children and an impoverished sense of identity. Adopters felt that lack of information also limited their understanding of the child and therefore their ability to offer therapeutic parenting; they were ‘parenting in the dark’. A majority expressed strong views that it was their child's right to have this information; a minority felt that confidentiality of birth family health information should remain a paramount consideration. These data furnish the debate with an important missing dimension from those whose lives are potentially enriched or impaired by the quality of information shared.
adoption, Confidentiality, data protection, family medical history
45-53
Hill, Catherine M.
172dc851-574e-4815-9c5e-4de4dae9fc35
Edwards, Maria
55b67786-60a2-46bf-81b7-62319f0cbbd5
Hill, Catherine M.
172dc851-574e-4815-9c5e-4de4dae9fc35
Edwards, Maria
55b67786-60a2-46bf-81b7-62319f0cbbd5
Hill, Catherine M. and Edwards, Maria
(2009)
Birth family health history: adopters’ perspectives on learning about their child’s health inheritance.
Adoption and Fostering, 33 (2), .
(doi:10.1177/030857590903300206).
Abstract
Birth family health history is shared with prospective adopters to help them understand a child's future health risks. But guidelines for health professionals indicate that such third-party information should not be shared without the consent of birth parents. In practice this can be difficult to achieve. Catherine Hill and Maria Edwards' survey of 57 adoptions sought to explore the views and experiences of adopters about the value of this information to both themselves and their child. Absence of information, particularly with respect to paternal history, was common and resulted in adverse consequences for children and an impoverished sense of identity. Adopters felt that lack of information also limited their understanding of the child and therefore their ability to offer therapeutic parenting; they were ‘parenting in the dark’. A majority expressed strong views that it was their child's right to have this information; a minority felt that confidentiality of birth family health information should remain a paramount consideration. These data furnish the debate with an important missing dimension from those whose lives are potentially enriched or impaired by the quality of information shared.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 July 2009
Keywords:
adoption, Confidentiality, data protection, family medical history
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 482548
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/482548
ISSN: 0308-5759
PURE UUID: 61cb270b-bcd7-440e-9a3a-fbf12911bb2f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Oct 2023 16:52
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:56
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Catherine M. Hill
Author:
Maria Edwards
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics