The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The interaction of two saccharomyces cerevisiae strains affects fermentation-derived compounds in wine

The interaction of two saccharomyces cerevisiae strains affects fermentation-derived compounds in wine
The interaction of two saccharomyces cerevisiae strains affects fermentation-derived compounds in wine

Previous winery-based studies showed the strains Lalvin® RC212 (RC212) and Lalvin® ICV-D254 (D254), when present together during fermentation, contributed to >80% relative abundance of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae population in inoculated and spontaneous fermentations. In these studies, D254 appeared to out-compete RC212, even when RC212 was used as the inoculant. In the present study, under controlled conditions, we tested the hypotheses that D254 would out-compete RC212 during fermentation and have a greater impact on key fermentation-derived chemicals. The experiment consisted of four fermentation treatments, each conducted in triplicate: a pure culture control of RC212; a pure culture control of D254; a 1:1 co-inoculation ratio of RC212:D254; and a 4:1 co-inoculation ratio of RC212:D254. Strain abundance was monitored at four stages. Inoculation ratios remained the same throughout fermentation, indicating an absence of competitive exclusion by either strain. The chemical profile of the 1:1 treatment closely resembled pure D254 fermentations, suggesting D254, under laboratory conditions, had a greater influence on the selected sensory compounds than did RC212. Nevertheless, the chemical profile of the 4:1 treatment, in which RC212 dominated, resembled that of pure RC212 fermentations. Our results support the idea that co-inoculation of strains creates a new chemical profile not seen in the pure cultures. These findings may have implications for winemakers looking to control wine aroma and flavor profiles through strain selection.

Fermentation-derived compounds, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Strain interaction
Gustafsson, Frida S.
5b81b981-01fa-4660-a768-8bcfeb46da00
Jiranek, Vladimir
8e5a8dfd-f5b2-43e3-928b-11dff324abc7
Neuner, Marissa
a746dd53-13dc-420e-b99a-67f07651fae3
Scholl, Chrystal M.
7dcc3565-c370-4790-95c4-10490ee51421
Morgan, Sydney C.
57ecc8a1-b554-4493-b5d9-3b81da5d3a16
Durall, Daniel M.
b155e6c8-bde7-48f1-89d4-15bafbffe907
Gustafsson, Frida S.
5b81b981-01fa-4660-a768-8bcfeb46da00
Jiranek, Vladimir
8e5a8dfd-f5b2-43e3-928b-11dff324abc7
Neuner, Marissa
a746dd53-13dc-420e-b99a-67f07651fae3
Scholl, Chrystal M.
7dcc3565-c370-4790-95c4-10490ee51421
Morgan, Sydney C.
57ecc8a1-b554-4493-b5d9-3b81da5d3a16
Durall, Daniel M.
b155e6c8-bde7-48f1-89d4-15bafbffe907

Gustafsson, Frida S., Jiranek, Vladimir, Neuner, Marissa, Scholl, Chrystal M., Morgan, Sydney C. and Durall, Daniel M. (2016) The interaction of two saccharomyces cerevisiae strains affects fermentation-derived compounds in wine. Fermentation, 2 (2), [9]. (doi:10.3390/fermentation2020009).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Previous winery-based studies showed the strains Lalvin® RC212 (RC212) and Lalvin® ICV-D254 (D254), when present together during fermentation, contributed to >80% relative abundance of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae population in inoculated and spontaneous fermentations. In these studies, D254 appeared to out-compete RC212, even when RC212 was used as the inoculant. In the present study, under controlled conditions, we tested the hypotheses that D254 would out-compete RC212 during fermentation and have a greater impact on key fermentation-derived chemicals. The experiment consisted of four fermentation treatments, each conducted in triplicate: a pure culture control of RC212; a pure culture control of D254; a 1:1 co-inoculation ratio of RC212:D254; and a 4:1 co-inoculation ratio of RC212:D254. Strain abundance was monitored at four stages. Inoculation ratios remained the same throughout fermentation, indicating an absence of competitive exclusion by either strain. The chemical profile of the 1:1 treatment closely resembled pure D254 fermentations, suggesting D254, under laboratory conditions, had a greater influence on the selected sensory compounds than did RC212. Nevertheless, the chemical profile of the 4:1 treatment, in which RC212 dominated, resembled that of pure RC212 fermentations. Our results support the idea that co-inoculation of strains creates a new chemical profile not seen in the pure cultures. These findings may have implications for winemakers looking to control wine aroma and flavor profiles through strain selection.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2016
Additional Information: Funding Information: Acknowledgments: This work was supported by Quails’ Gate Estate Winery and the Natural Sciences and Research Engineering Council (NSERC) through an NSERC Collaborative Research Development (CRD) grant CRDPJ 406796-10, as well as by the UBC internal wine grant. We thank Grant Stanley and David Ledderhof for providing valuable assistance throughout the study. We also graciously thank Lallemand Inc. for the donation of Lalvin®yeasts. Publisher Copyright: © 2016 by the authors.
Keywords: Fermentation-derived compounds, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Strain interaction

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 482617
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/482617
PURE UUID: 9ba94dd0-3cf1-46ac-a555-8b9a3fb606d6
ORCID for Vladimir Jiranek: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9775-8963

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Oct 2023 17:01
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:12

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Frida S. Gustafsson
Author: Vladimir Jiranek ORCID iD
Author: Marissa Neuner
Author: Chrystal M. Scholl
Author: Sydney C. Morgan
Author: Daniel M. Durall

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×