The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparative evaluation of equivalent circuit and finite element electrical skin modelling techniques

A comparative evaluation of equivalent circuit and finite element electrical skin modelling techniques
A comparative evaluation of equivalent circuit and finite element electrical skin modelling techniques
Mathematical models are essential to our understanding of the electrical properties of the skin. In this paper, two types of simulation model, an equivalent circuit and a finite element simulation were investigated and compared to evaluate their accuracy. Impedance spectra were measured, between 100 Hz and 50 MHz, (the limits of the available spectrum analyser) of a pair of electrodes placed on skin and these spectra used to find the parameters of a standard equivalent circuit model. The resulting indicated that the components of the equivalent circuit may represent different parts of the skin physiology that indicated by the literature. A simulation model was constructed in COMSOL, with the dimensions, permittivity and conductivity of each skin layer taken from across the published literature. This model was tested for sensitivity to the thicknesses of tissue layers as well as the shape of the boundary between layers. It was found that changing the layer thicknesses only had a significant effect for the stratum corneum and dermis, and that changing the shape of the boundary between layers created an impedance change of up to two times at certain higher frequencies (>1 kHz). While the impedance curves generated by the two models had the same overall profile, there was a difference of up to 100 times in their DC impedance values. This indicated that the broad understanding of how electrical signals of different frequencies pass through the skin is correct, but that significant insufficiencies exist in the published properties of the skin layers, particularly the stratum corneum and that finding more accurate values for these properties is necessary for the development of better models.
equivalent circuit modelling, finite element modelling, skin
Greig, Thomas Alastair
cabac522-b35a-4936-9451-4fa67a49c9e7
Yang, Kai
f1c9b81d-e821-47eb-a69e-b3bc419de9c7
Torah, Russel
7147b47b-db01-4124-95dc-90d6a9842688
Greig, Thomas Alastair
cabac522-b35a-4936-9451-4fa67a49c9e7
Yang, Kai
f1c9b81d-e821-47eb-a69e-b3bc419de9c7
Torah, Russel
7147b47b-db01-4124-95dc-90d6a9842688

Greig, Thomas Alastair, Yang, Kai and Torah, Russel (2023) A comparative evaluation of equivalent circuit and finite element electrical skin modelling techniques. Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express, 9 (6), [065013]. (doi:10.1088/2057-1976/acfb04).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Mathematical models are essential to our understanding of the electrical properties of the skin. In this paper, two types of simulation model, an equivalent circuit and a finite element simulation were investigated and compared to evaluate their accuracy. Impedance spectra were measured, between 100 Hz and 50 MHz, (the limits of the available spectrum analyser) of a pair of electrodes placed on skin and these spectra used to find the parameters of a standard equivalent circuit model. The resulting indicated that the components of the equivalent circuit may represent different parts of the skin physiology that indicated by the literature. A simulation model was constructed in COMSOL, with the dimensions, permittivity and conductivity of each skin layer taken from across the published literature. This model was tested for sensitivity to the thicknesses of tissue layers as well as the shape of the boundary between layers. It was found that changing the layer thicknesses only had a significant effect for the stratum corneum and dermis, and that changing the shape of the boundary between layers created an impedance change of up to two times at certain higher frequencies (>1 kHz). While the impedance curves generated by the two models had the same overall profile, there was a difference of up to 100 times in their DC impedance values. This indicated that the broad understanding of how electrical signals of different frequencies pass through the skin is correct, but that significant insufficiencies exist in the published properties of the skin layers, particularly the stratum corneum and that finding more accurate values for these properties is necessary for the development of better models.

Text
paper - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (842kB)
Text
Greig_2023_Biomed._Phys._Eng._Express_9_065013 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 19 September 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 October 2023
Published date: 4 October 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: This work was funded by EPSRC project reference 2280784. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
Keywords: equivalent circuit modelling, finite element modelling, skin

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 482636
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/482636
PURE UUID: 108d6654-3ce8-47fa-b783-03ffd81d9c6d
ORCID for Thomas Alastair Greig: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2745-235X
ORCID for Kai Yang: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7497-3911
ORCID for Russel Torah: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5598-2860

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Oct 2023 16:44
Last modified: 10 Apr 2024 01:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Thomas Alastair Greig ORCID iD
Author: Kai Yang ORCID iD
Author: Russel Torah ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×