The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Remote recruitment strategy and structured E-parenting support (STEPS) app: feasibility and usability study

Remote recruitment strategy and structured E-parenting support (STEPS) app: feasibility and usability study
Remote recruitment strategy and structured E-parenting support (STEPS) app: feasibility and usability study

Background: The Structured E-Parenting Support (STEPS) app provides support for parents of children with elevated hyperactivity, impulsivity, inattention, and conduct problems who are awaiting clinical assessment. STEPS will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) within the Online Parent Training for the Initial Management of ADHD Referrals (OPTIMA) research program in the United Kingdom. Phase 1 of the OPTIMA tested the feasibility of participants’ recruitment and the app’s usability. Objective: This study aimed to adapt a digital routine clinical monitoring system, myHealthE, for research purposes to facilitate waitlist recruitment; test using remote methods to screen and identify participants quickly and systematically; pilot the acceptability of the recruitment and assessment protocol; and explore the usability of STEPS. Methods: myHealthE was adapted to screen patients’ data. Parents’ and clinicians’ feedback on myHealthE was collected, and information governance reviews were conducted in clinical services planning to host the RCT. Potential participants for the observational feasibility study were identified from new referrals using myHealthE and non-myHealthE methods. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic and outcome variables. We estimated whether the recruitment rate would meet the planned RCT sample size requirement (n=352). In addition to the feasibility study participants, another group of parents was recruited to assess the STEPS usability. They completed the adapted System Usability Scale and responded to open-ended questions about the app, which were coded using the Enlight quality construct template. Results: Overall, 124 potential participants were identified as eligible: 121 (97.6%) via myHealthE and 3 (2.4%) via non-myHealthE methods. In total, 107 parents were contacted, and 48 (44.9%) consented and were asked if, hypothetically, they would be willing to participate in the OPTIMA RCT. Of the 28 feasibility study participants who provided demographic data, 21 (75%) identified as White. Their children had an average age of 8.4 (SD 1.7) years and 65% (31/48) were male. During the primary recruitment period (June to July 2021) when 45 participants had consented, 38 (84%) participants agreed hypothetically to take part in the RCT (rate of 19/mo, 95% CI 13.5-26.1), meeting the stop-go criterion of 18 participants per month to proceed with the RCT. All parents were satisfied or very satisfied with the study procedures. Parents (n=12) recruited to assess STEPS’ usability described it as easy to navigate and use and as having an attractive combination of colors and visual design. They described the content as useful, pitched at the right level, and sensitively presented. Suggested improvements included adding captions to videos or making the recorded reflections editable. Conclusions: Remote recruitment and study procedures for testing a parenting intervention app are feasible and acceptable for parents. The parents felt that STEPS was a useful and easy-to-use digital parenting support tool.

ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, behavior problems, children, mHealth, mobile app, mobile health, mobile phone, parenting intervention, usability
2561-6722
Kostyrka-Allchorne, Katarzyna
4473a9e8-242b-489f-94fe-e42bb3b5563b
Chu, Petrina
88ff9c7a-60b6-423c-a28d-97e12ba5b03a
Ballard, Claire
09135d2f-c773-47a1-a80f-6a56d0ee06af
Lean, Nancy
c3e906b2-59ab-4d0a-9231-cff46a977de1
French, Blandine
5c6f49b7-3e27-44fb-a5db-8f76ed7f10e7
Hedstrom, Ellen
19310ce7-3075-43d2-a850-54a10ba1803a
Byford, Sarah
0778f700-ef50-4e37-b7e6-88063b7a0c49
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb
Daley, David
a546194a-a0cf-41dd-a456-fbf8fc58ae27
Downs, Johnny
a062e656-bd1d-42d4-9ca7-4ab8936cbde1
Glazebrook, Cristine
67118245-a51f-42de-b6d5-96d2c04ea2d8
Goldsmith, Kimberley
081d71e5-c45d-4feb-bb76-4d4566005bb9
Hall, Charlotte L.
e4bcf579-5e93-4842-a7ff-8e7cfa055436
Kovshoff, Hanna
82c321ee-d151-40c5-8dde-281af59f2142
Kreppner, Jana
6a5f447e-1cfe-4654-95b4-e6f89b0275d6
Sayal, Kapil
7dac1e7a-54d2-4d7e-862b-addfcfb8513a
Shearer, James
16811e55-6d5d-4779-8ba3-4af41260b710
Simonoff, Emily
f47d91a8-3d57-4183-bf24-80352c55eedc
Thompson, Margaret
722079c8-80f8-48be-a82d-36a159d43d24
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J.S.
bc80bf95-6cf9-4c76-a09d-eaaf0b717635
Kostyrka-Allchorne, Katarzyna
4473a9e8-242b-489f-94fe-e42bb3b5563b
Chu, Petrina
88ff9c7a-60b6-423c-a28d-97e12ba5b03a
Ballard, Claire
09135d2f-c773-47a1-a80f-6a56d0ee06af
Lean, Nancy
c3e906b2-59ab-4d0a-9231-cff46a977de1
French, Blandine
5c6f49b7-3e27-44fb-a5db-8f76ed7f10e7
Hedstrom, Ellen
19310ce7-3075-43d2-a850-54a10ba1803a
Byford, Sarah
0778f700-ef50-4e37-b7e6-88063b7a0c49
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb
Daley, David
a546194a-a0cf-41dd-a456-fbf8fc58ae27
Downs, Johnny
a062e656-bd1d-42d4-9ca7-4ab8936cbde1
Glazebrook, Cristine
67118245-a51f-42de-b6d5-96d2c04ea2d8
Goldsmith, Kimberley
081d71e5-c45d-4feb-bb76-4d4566005bb9
Hall, Charlotte L.
e4bcf579-5e93-4842-a7ff-8e7cfa055436
Kovshoff, Hanna
82c321ee-d151-40c5-8dde-281af59f2142
Kreppner, Jana
6a5f447e-1cfe-4654-95b4-e6f89b0275d6
Sayal, Kapil
7dac1e7a-54d2-4d7e-862b-addfcfb8513a
Shearer, James
16811e55-6d5d-4779-8ba3-4af41260b710
Simonoff, Emily
f47d91a8-3d57-4183-bf24-80352c55eedc
Thompson, Margaret
722079c8-80f8-48be-a82d-36a159d43d24
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J.S.
bc80bf95-6cf9-4c76-a09d-eaaf0b717635

Kostyrka-Allchorne, Katarzyna, Chu, Petrina, Ballard, Claire, Lean, Nancy, French, Blandine, Hedstrom, Ellen, Byford, Sarah, Cortese, Samuele, Daley, David, Downs, Johnny, Glazebrook, Cristine, Goldsmith, Kimberley, Hall, Charlotte L., Kovshoff, Hanna, Kreppner, Jana, Sayal, Kapil, Shearer, James, Simonoff, Emily, Thompson, Margaret and Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J.S. (2023) Remote recruitment strategy and structured E-parenting support (STEPS) app: feasibility and usability study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, 6 (1), [e47035]. (doi:10.2196/47035).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: The Structured E-Parenting Support (STEPS) app provides support for parents of children with elevated hyperactivity, impulsivity, inattention, and conduct problems who are awaiting clinical assessment. STEPS will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) within the Online Parent Training for the Initial Management of ADHD Referrals (OPTIMA) research program in the United Kingdom. Phase 1 of the OPTIMA tested the feasibility of participants’ recruitment and the app’s usability. Objective: This study aimed to adapt a digital routine clinical monitoring system, myHealthE, for research purposes to facilitate waitlist recruitment; test using remote methods to screen and identify participants quickly and systematically; pilot the acceptability of the recruitment and assessment protocol; and explore the usability of STEPS. Methods: myHealthE was adapted to screen patients’ data. Parents’ and clinicians’ feedback on myHealthE was collected, and information governance reviews were conducted in clinical services planning to host the RCT. Potential participants for the observational feasibility study were identified from new referrals using myHealthE and non-myHealthE methods. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic and outcome variables. We estimated whether the recruitment rate would meet the planned RCT sample size requirement (n=352). In addition to the feasibility study participants, another group of parents was recruited to assess the STEPS usability. They completed the adapted System Usability Scale and responded to open-ended questions about the app, which were coded using the Enlight quality construct template. Results: Overall, 124 potential participants were identified as eligible: 121 (97.6%) via myHealthE and 3 (2.4%) via non-myHealthE methods. In total, 107 parents were contacted, and 48 (44.9%) consented and were asked if, hypothetically, they would be willing to participate in the OPTIMA RCT. Of the 28 feasibility study participants who provided demographic data, 21 (75%) identified as White. Their children had an average age of 8.4 (SD 1.7) years and 65% (31/48) were male. During the primary recruitment period (June to July 2021) when 45 participants had consented, 38 (84%) participants agreed hypothetically to take part in the RCT (rate of 19/mo, 95% CI 13.5-26.1), meeting the stop-go criterion of 18 participants per month to proceed with the RCT. All parents were satisfied or very satisfied with the study procedures. Parents (n=12) recruited to assess STEPS’ usability described it as easy to navigate and use and as having an attractive combination of colors and visual design. They described the content as useful, pitched at the right level, and sensitively presented. Suggested improvements included adding captions to videos or making the recorded reflections editable. Conclusions: Remote recruitment and study procedures for testing a parenting intervention app are feasible and acceptable for parents. The parents felt that STEPS was a useful and easy-to-use digital parenting support tool.

Text
PDF (1) - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (492kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 July 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 September 2023
Published date: 11 September 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: CLH acknowledges support from the NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre and NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative. KS is an NIHR Senior Investigator. Funding Information: Online Parent Training for the Initial Management of ADHD Referrals (OPTIMA) is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research (RP-PG-0618-20003). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funding body played no role in the study design and conduct. Funding Information: This paper represents an independent research project part funded by the NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust and King’s College London and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London at King’s College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, NIHR, or Department of Health and Social Care. Funding Information: SC declares honoraria and reimbursement for travel and accommodation expenses for lectures from the following nonprofit associations in the last 3 years: Association for Child and Adolescent Central Health, Canadian ADHD Alliance Resource, the British Association of Pharmacology for educational activity on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. DD declares educational talks for Medice, and Takeda, advisory board attendance for Takeda, and educational travel from Takeda and Medice. He has also received royalties from the sale of a self-help version of the New Forest Parenting Programme, on which STEPS is based, payments for providing training on New Forest Parenting Programme, nonmonetary support from Qbtech, and research funding from National Institute for Health Research. EJSS-B declares speaker fees and conference support from Takeda and Medice, honoraria from the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Aarhus University, and research support from Qbtech, Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, Waterloo Foundation, and Shanly Foundation. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s).
Keywords: ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, behavior problems, children, mHealth, mobile app, mobile health, mobile phone, parenting intervention, usability

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 482846
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/482846
ISSN: 2561-6722
PURE UUID: da740dbd-5c0f-474d-973e-ec69eefbff41
ORCID for Samuele Cortese: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-8075
ORCID for Hanna Kovshoff: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6041-0376
ORCID for Jana Kreppner: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3527-9083

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Oct 2023 16:43
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Katarzyna Kostyrka-Allchorne
Author: Petrina Chu
Author: Claire Ballard
Author: Nancy Lean
Author: Blandine French
Author: Ellen Hedstrom
Author: Sarah Byford
Author: Samuele Cortese ORCID iD
Author: David Daley
Author: Johnny Downs
Author: Cristine Glazebrook
Author: Kimberley Goldsmith
Author: Charlotte L. Hall
Author: Hanna Kovshoff ORCID iD
Author: Jana Kreppner ORCID iD
Author: Kapil Sayal
Author: James Shearer
Author: Emily Simonoff
Author: Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×