Feeling the issue: how citizens' affective reactions and leadership perceptions shape policy evaluations
Feeling the issue: how citizens' affective reactions and leadership perceptions shape policy evaluations
This article examines how general feelings toward political actors shape the way citizens process information about policy issues. Images of political actors are prevalent shortcuts on which we rely during political decision making. A few studies go beyond the cognitive nature of these person-oriented heuristics and demonstrate that affective reactions toward a story protagonist generate swings in the evaluations of policy issues. This research borrows from the literature on persuasion, information processing, affective intelligence, and motivated reasoning to measure how affective responses to the image of a politician determine the way citizens evaluate policy proposals. In this study, an experiment is conducted wherein the name of a politician supporting two actual policy proposals is varied and the corresponding subjects' reactions to the policy content is measured. Findings suggest that the images projected by political candidates function as "gut-level" affective (emotional) shortcuts, such that when citizens dislike the source of the policy, they also adjust their policy evaluations downward. There is also evidence of differentiation in the waypolitical images affect policy evaluation on the basis ofpolitical knowledge and trust.
Affective heuristics, Emotions, Personalization, Policy evaluations, Political image, Political knowledge, Political trust
9-33
Capelos, Tereza
bd3b5744-cbcc-44a4-9b73-b088d82154e7
January 2010
Capelos, Tereza
bd3b5744-cbcc-44a4-9b73-b088d82154e7
Capelos, Tereza
(2010)
Feeling the issue: how citizens' affective reactions and leadership perceptions shape policy evaluations.
Journal of Political Marketing, 9 (1-2), .
(doi:10.1080/15377850903583038).
Abstract
This article examines how general feelings toward political actors shape the way citizens process information about policy issues. Images of political actors are prevalent shortcuts on which we rely during political decision making. A few studies go beyond the cognitive nature of these person-oriented heuristics and demonstrate that affective reactions toward a story protagonist generate swings in the evaluations of policy issues. This research borrows from the literature on persuasion, information processing, affective intelligence, and motivated reasoning to measure how affective responses to the image of a politician determine the way citizens evaluate policy proposals. In this study, an experiment is conducted wherein the name of a politician supporting two actual policy proposals is varied and the corresponding subjects' reactions to the policy content is measured. Findings suggest that the images projected by political candidates function as "gut-level" affective (emotional) shortcuts, such that when citizens dislike the source of the policy, they also adjust their policy evaluations downward. There is also evidence of differentiation in the waypolitical images affect policy evaluation on the basis ofpolitical knowledge and trust.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: January 2010
Keywords:
Affective heuristics, Emotions, Personalization, Policy evaluations, Political image, Political knowledge, Political trust
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 482952
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/482952
ISSN: 1537-7857
PURE UUID: 4aba82e9-f095-4710-9245-0e1b6bf6e7a2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Oct 2023 16:56
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tereza Capelos
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics