Face detection in peripheral vision: do faces pop out?
Face detection in peripheral vision: do faces pop out?
We examined whether faces can produce a 'pop-out' effect in visual search tasks. In the first experiment, subjects' eye movements and search latencies were measured while they viewed a display containing a target face amidst distractors. Targets were upright or inverted faces presented with seven others of the opposite polarity as an 'around-the-clock' display. Face images were either photographic or 'feature only', with the outline removed. Naive subjects were poor at locating an upright face from an array of inverted faces, but performance improved with practice. In the second experiment, we investigated systematically how training improved performance. Prior to testing, subjects were practised on locating either upright or inverted faces. All subjects benefited from training. Subjects practised on upright faces were faster and more accurate at locating upright target faces than inverted. Subjects practised on inverted faces showed no difference between upright and inverted targets. In the third experiment, faces with 'jumbled' features were used as distractors, and this resulted in the same pattern of findings. We conclude that there is no direct rapid 'pop-out' effect for faces. However, the findings demonstrate that, in peripheral vision, upright faces show a processing advantage over inverted faces.
1555-1570
Brown, V.
4827cede-6668-4e3d-bded-ade4cd5e5db5
Huey, D.
7a07ef39-bb99-4a54-8757-9e65c7a1da89
Findlay, J.M.
74165557-a6c2-4c41-ba85-cd2df70b84a9
1997
Brown, V.
4827cede-6668-4e3d-bded-ade4cd5e5db5
Huey, D.
7a07ef39-bb99-4a54-8757-9e65c7a1da89
Findlay, J.M.
74165557-a6c2-4c41-ba85-cd2df70b84a9
Brown, V., Huey, D. and Findlay, J.M.
(1997)
Face detection in peripheral vision: do faces pop out?
Perception, 26 (12), .
(doi:10.1068/p261555).
Abstract
We examined whether faces can produce a 'pop-out' effect in visual search tasks. In the first experiment, subjects' eye movements and search latencies were measured while they viewed a display containing a target face amidst distractors. Targets were upright or inverted faces presented with seven others of the opposite polarity as an 'around-the-clock' display. Face images were either photographic or 'feature only', with the outline removed. Naive subjects were poor at locating an upright face from an array of inverted faces, but performance improved with practice. In the second experiment, we investigated systematically how training improved performance. Prior to testing, subjects were practised on locating either upright or inverted faces. All subjects benefited from training. Subjects practised on upright faces were faster and more accurate at locating upright target faces than inverted. Subjects practised on inverted faces showed no difference between upright and inverted targets. In the third experiment, faces with 'jumbled' features were used as distractors, and this resulted in the same pattern of findings. We conclude that there is no direct rapid 'pop-out' effect for faces. However, the findings demonstrate that, in peripheral vision, upright faces show a processing advantage over inverted faces.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1997
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 48322
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/48322
PURE UUID: aa855491-460a-4cf9-b76d-93895d11dedc
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Jan 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:45
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
V. Brown
Author:
D. Huey
Author:
J.M. Findlay
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics