The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Factors that influence women’s enrolment and ongoing participation in a partially decentralised randomised controlled dermatology trial: a qualitative interview study with participants in the SAFA (Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne) trial

Factors that influence women’s enrolment and ongoing participation in a partially decentralised randomised controlled dermatology trial: a qualitative interview study with participants in the SAFA (Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne) trial
Factors that influence women’s enrolment and ongoing participation in a partially decentralised randomised controlled dermatology trial: a qualitative interview study with participants in the SAFA (Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne) trial

Background: The use of decentralised clinical trials (which bring trials to patients through remote processes and technology versus central on-site visits) has been thought to be a potential solution to common recruitment and retention barriers. However, there is a lack of evidence to understand the experiences, needs and preferences of the public to inform trial methodologies that appeal to different populations. We report participant experiences of SAFA, a partially decentralised randomised clinical trial, to inform the methodology used in future dermatology trials that aim to appeal to women aged 18 and over. Methods: Participants of the SAFA (Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne) trial were invited to take part in a qualitative semi-structured interview to explore their experience and perspectives of taking part in the trial. Questions focused on their experience of using decentralised methods to access and enrol in the trial (e.g. social media advertising), in addition to the decentralised trial visit and data collection methods used throughout. Interviews were conducted remotely, recorded, and transcribed. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Twelve SAFA participants (all women, age range 22–36 years) were interviewed. Initially, participants were influenced to enrol by trusted online information, the feeling of validation the trial provided, and the convenience and flexibility offered by the decentralised methods and research staff made participants feel valued and enabled them to engage in the trial with minimal interference to existing commitments. SAFA participants were generally accepting of trial demands, such as the text-heavy paperwork and on-site visits for blood collection and highlighted several areas relevant for trial conduct going forwards including where decentralised methods may (and may not) be accepted and how trial accessibility and understanding could be improved. Conclusions: The study has shown that decentralised methods used by responsive and approachable staff were widely accepted in the SAFA trial. Interviewees found the methods adopted in the SAFA trial helped the trial to fit with their needs and promoted a sense of feeling valued that encouraged ongoing trial engagement. Decentralised methods should be considered favourably when designing a dermatology trial as they can potentially enhance both recruitment and retention. Trial registration number: ISRCTN 12892056. Registered on October 15, 2018.

Decentralised, Dermatology, Experience, Hybrid, Qualitative, Recruitment, Retention, Trial
1745-6215
Boxall, Cherish
72cc50f6-139d-44a6-abdb-84b369fcb799
Renz, Susanne
4537317b-9305-464a-af38-5dd50ed70258
Eminton, Zina
44904d98-97be-4080-9a84-bf5742525f8e
Nuttall, Jacqueline
154aec0a-05f2-4379-918e-9c36767fdc4c
Saji, Alan
c4438b40-4f05-41b8-90ce-017694fec7de
Cluff, Charlotte
4feba992-93fa-4121-95e4-fe1a2776b5d5
Wilcox, Christopher
e2c4c36a-e2e5-43a5-9fd6-7198cc15dd53
Muller, Ingrid
2569bf42-51bd-40da-bbfd-dd4dbbd62cad
Layton, Alison M.
5b851301-28e2-49f6-af30-a1bb7f35baa1
Soulsby, Irene
96080278-1724-45a0-9066-5e2dfdde90af
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Boxall, Cherish
72cc50f6-139d-44a6-abdb-84b369fcb799
Renz, Susanne
4537317b-9305-464a-af38-5dd50ed70258
Eminton, Zina
44904d98-97be-4080-9a84-bf5742525f8e
Nuttall, Jacqueline
154aec0a-05f2-4379-918e-9c36767fdc4c
Saji, Alan
c4438b40-4f05-41b8-90ce-017694fec7de
Cluff, Charlotte
4feba992-93fa-4121-95e4-fe1a2776b5d5
Wilcox, Christopher
e2c4c36a-e2e5-43a5-9fd6-7198cc15dd53
Muller, Ingrid
2569bf42-51bd-40da-bbfd-dd4dbbd62cad
Layton, Alison M.
5b851301-28e2-49f6-af30-a1bb7f35baa1
Soulsby, Irene
96080278-1724-45a0-9066-5e2dfdde90af
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc

Boxall, Cherish, Renz, Susanne, Eminton, Zina, Nuttall, Jacqueline, Saji, Alan, Cluff, Charlotte, Wilcox, Christopher, Muller, Ingrid, Layton, Alison M., Soulsby, Irene and Santer, Miriam (2023) Factors that influence women’s enrolment and ongoing participation in a partially decentralised randomised controlled dermatology trial: a qualitative interview study with participants in the SAFA (Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne) trial. Trials, 24 (1), [661]. (doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07630-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: The use of decentralised clinical trials (which bring trials to patients through remote processes and technology versus central on-site visits) has been thought to be a potential solution to common recruitment and retention barriers. However, there is a lack of evidence to understand the experiences, needs and preferences of the public to inform trial methodologies that appeal to different populations. We report participant experiences of SAFA, a partially decentralised randomised clinical trial, to inform the methodology used in future dermatology trials that aim to appeal to women aged 18 and over. Methods: Participants of the SAFA (Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne) trial were invited to take part in a qualitative semi-structured interview to explore their experience and perspectives of taking part in the trial. Questions focused on their experience of using decentralised methods to access and enrol in the trial (e.g. social media advertising), in addition to the decentralised trial visit and data collection methods used throughout. Interviews were conducted remotely, recorded, and transcribed. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Twelve SAFA participants (all women, age range 22–36 years) were interviewed. Initially, participants were influenced to enrol by trusted online information, the feeling of validation the trial provided, and the convenience and flexibility offered by the decentralised methods and research staff made participants feel valued and enabled them to engage in the trial with minimal interference to existing commitments. SAFA participants were generally accepting of trial demands, such as the text-heavy paperwork and on-site visits for blood collection and highlighted several areas relevant for trial conduct going forwards including where decentralised methods may (and may not) be accepted and how trial accessibility and understanding could be improved. Conclusions: The study has shown that decentralised methods used by responsive and approachable staff were widely accepted in the SAFA trial. Interviewees found the methods adopted in the SAFA trial helped the trial to fit with their needs and promoted a sense of feeling valued that encouraged ongoing trial engagement. Decentralised methods should be considered favourably when designing a dermatology trial as they can potentially enhance both recruitment and retention. Trial registration number: ISRCTN 12892056. Registered on October 15, 2018.

Text
s13063-023-07630-4 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 September 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 October 2023
Published date: 12 October 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: We would like to thank the participants for sharing their experiences and express our sincere gratitude to the staff who carried out the SAFA trial at recruiting centres including; hospital dermatology centres recruiting for the study: Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham; Bristol Royal Infirmary Dermatology Centre, Bristol; University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff; General Hospital, Epsom; District Hospital, Harrogate; St Mary’s Hospital (Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust), London; Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham; General Hospital, Poole; St Mary’s General Hospital Dermatology Centre, Portsmouth; Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea; participant identification centres (PICs) for searching their patient lists and mail outs and clinical research networks for helping to identify potential PICs. Funding Information: This project is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (Grant Reference Number: 16/13/02) and supported by NIHR CTU support funding at Southampton CTU. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The NIHR HTA funder will play no role in the execution, analysis, interpretation of data, or study publication. The study is registered on the UK NIHR study portfolio meaning there are research nurses based at UK hospitals who help in screening potential patients to identify those eligible for the study. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Keywords: Decentralised, Dermatology, Experience, Hybrid, Qualitative, Recruitment, Retention, Trial

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 483289
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483289
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: cb294772-ca95-43c4-a017-d65c6218d92e
ORCID for Ingrid Muller: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9341-6133
ORCID for Miriam Santer: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7264-5260

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Oct 2023 16:38
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Cherish Boxall
Author: Susanne Renz
Author: Zina Eminton
Author: Jacqueline Nuttall
Author: Alan Saji
Author: Charlotte Cluff
Author: Ingrid Muller ORCID iD
Author: Alison M. Layton
Author: Irene Soulsby
Author: Miriam Santer ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×