The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Implementing a nurse-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy intervention to reduce the impact of hot flushes/night sweats in women with breast cancer: a qualitative process evaluation of the MENOS4 trial

Implementing a nurse-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy intervention to reduce the impact of hot flushes/night sweats in women with breast cancer: a qualitative process evaluation of the MENOS4 trial
Implementing a nurse-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy intervention to reduce the impact of hot flushes/night sweats in women with breast cancer: a qualitative process evaluation of the MENOS4 trial
Background: hot flushes and night sweats are life-altering symptoms experienced by many women after breast cancer treatment. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to explore the effectiveness of breast care nurse (BCN)-led group cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). This paper reported findings from a qualitative process evaluation to optimise the CBT intervention and explore the determinants of implementation into routine practice.

Methods: qualitative process evaluation occurred in parallel with the RCT to explore patient and healthcare staff experiences and perspectives using semi-structured interviews pre-and post-intervention. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) informed data collection, analysis, and reporting of findings. The analysis involved inductive thematic analysis, NPT coding manual and subsequent mapping onto NPT constructs.

Results: BCNs (n=8), managers (n=2), surgeons (n=3) and trial participants (n=8) from six sites took part. All stakeholders believed group CBT met a need for non-medical hot flushes/night sweats treatment, however, had little exposure or understanding of CBT before MENOS4. BCNs believed the work fitted with their identity and felt confident in delivering the sessions. Despite little understanding, patients enrolled onto group CBT because the BCNs were trusted to have the knowledge and understanding to support their needs and despite initial scepticism, reported great benefit from group-based participation. Both managers and surgeons were keen for BCNs to take responsibility for all aspects of CBT delivery, but there were some tensions with existing clinical commitments.

Conclusions: both healthcare staff and patient participants believe BCN-led group CBT is a beneficial service but barriers to long-term implementation into routine care suggest there needs to be multi-level organisational support.

Trial registration: NCT02623374 – Last updated 07/12/2015 on ClinicalTrials.gov PRS
Research Square
Boxall, Cherish
62deb102-02d5-4613-bd6c-7f2606367b0a
Fenlon, Deborah
52f9a9f1-1643-449c-9856-258ef563342c
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Nuttall, Jacqui
b4c18569-1ab8-4fb6-b72d-1a61ad271a1a
Hunter, Myra S.
fce15222-f73f-478a-87fd-d480cac6fd2a
Boxall, Cherish
62deb102-02d5-4613-bd6c-7f2606367b0a
Fenlon, Deborah
52f9a9f1-1643-449c-9856-258ef563342c
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Nuttall, Jacqui
b4c18569-1ab8-4fb6-b72d-1a61ad271a1a
Hunter, Myra S.
fce15222-f73f-478a-87fd-d480cac6fd2a

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Background: hot flushes and night sweats are life-altering symptoms experienced by many women after breast cancer treatment. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to explore the effectiveness of breast care nurse (BCN)-led group cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). This paper reported findings from a qualitative process evaluation to optimise the CBT intervention and explore the determinants of implementation into routine practice.

Methods: qualitative process evaluation occurred in parallel with the RCT to explore patient and healthcare staff experiences and perspectives using semi-structured interviews pre-and post-intervention. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) informed data collection, analysis, and reporting of findings. The analysis involved inductive thematic analysis, NPT coding manual and subsequent mapping onto NPT constructs.

Results: BCNs (n=8), managers (n=2), surgeons (n=3) and trial participants (n=8) from six sites took part. All stakeholders believed group CBT met a need for non-medical hot flushes/night sweats treatment, however, had little exposure or understanding of CBT before MENOS4. BCNs believed the work fitted with their identity and felt confident in delivering the sessions. Despite little understanding, patients enrolled onto group CBT because the BCNs were trusted to have the knowledge and understanding to support their needs and despite initial scepticism, reported great benefit from group-based participation. Both managers and surgeons were keen for BCNs to take responsibility for all aspects of CBT delivery, but there were some tensions with existing clinical commitments.

Conclusions: both healthcare staff and patient participants believe BCN-led group CBT is a beneficial service but barriers to long-term implementation into routine care suggest there needs to be multi-level organisational support.

Trial registration: NCT02623374 – Last updated 07/12/2015 on ClinicalTrials.gov PRS

Text
bce25e12-4804-49c6-97ad-bdc9535982c5 - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (436kB)

More information

Published date: 11 January 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 483299
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483299
PURE UUID: ee2702fc-a667-46b9-bb2f-372acf01f127
ORCID for Cherish Boxall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7850-233X
ORCID for Carl May: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0451-2690

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Oct 2023 16:44
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Cherish Boxall ORCID iD
Author: Deborah Fenlon
Author: Carl May ORCID iD
Author: Jacqui Nuttall
Author: Myra S. Hunter

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×