Comparison of weight-for-height and BMI-for-age for estimating overnutrition burden in under-five population with high stunting prevalence
Comparison of weight-for-height and BMI-for-age for estimating overnutrition burden in under-five population with high stunting prevalence
Background: Overnourished under-five children are anthropometrically classified as either being at possible risk of overweight, overweight or obese and defined so, when either weight-for-height or Body-Mass-Index-for-age (BMI-for-age) are >1SD to 2SD, >2SD to 3SD and >3SD, respectively of the analogous World Health Organization standards. Aim: To compare weight-for-height and BMI-for-age definitions for quantifying overnutrition burden. Methods: Theoretical consequences of ignoring age were evaluated by comparing, at varying height-for-age zscores, the age- and sex-specific cut-offs of BMI that would define overnutrition with these two metrics. Overnutrition prevalence was then compared in simulated populations (short, intermediate and tall) and real-life datasets from India. Results: In short (-2SD) children, the BMI cut-offs with weight-for-height criteria were lower in comparison to BMI-for-age till 7-8 months, but higher at later ages. In National Family Health Survey-4, India dataset (short population), overnutrition (>1SD) prevalence with weight-for-height was higher from 0-0.5 years (exclusive breastfeeding age), but lower at subsequent ages. The prevalence difference (weight-for-height - BMI-for-age) in 0.5-5 years was -2.26% (6.57% vs 8.83%); this attenuated in 0-5 years (-1.55%; 7.23% vs 8.78%). The discrepancy was maximal for stunted children and was lower in girls. A similar pattern, of lower magnitude, was observed for overweight (>2SD) comparison. In intermediate and tall populations, there were no meaningful differences. Conclusion: The two definitions produce cut-offs, and hence estimates of overnutrition, that differ with the age, sex, and height of under-five children. The relative invariance, with age and height, of BMI-for-age, favours its use.
17–26
Rajeev, L. Naga
b9eb9d4a-bd39-46bd-aa76-92c9a6e4c255
Saini, Monika
f75bd239-1133-49f6-b61c-cbabf52e8368
Kumar, Ashish
f6b4297f-9f9d-4bc9-8970-bc90c74cc95f
Osmond, Clive
2677bf85-494f-4a78-adf8-580e1b8acb81
Sachdev, H. P.
fb1b2723-48bc-469c-9cab-ae966c42b3ed
Rajeev, L. Naga
b9eb9d4a-bd39-46bd-aa76-92c9a6e4c255
Saini, Monika
f75bd239-1133-49f6-b61c-cbabf52e8368
Kumar, Ashish
f6b4297f-9f9d-4bc9-8970-bc90c74cc95f
Osmond, Clive
2677bf85-494f-4a78-adf8-580e1b8acb81
Sachdev, H. P.
fb1b2723-48bc-469c-9cab-ae966c42b3ed
Rajeev, L. Naga, Saini, Monika, Kumar, Ashish, Osmond, Clive and Sachdev, H. P.
(2022)
Comparison of weight-for-height and BMI-for-age for estimating overnutrition burden in under-five population with high stunting prevalence.
Indian pediatrics, 60, .
(doi:10.1007/s13312-023-2689-4).
Abstract
Background: Overnourished under-five children are anthropometrically classified as either being at possible risk of overweight, overweight or obese and defined so, when either weight-for-height or Body-Mass-Index-for-age (BMI-for-age) are >1SD to 2SD, >2SD to 3SD and >3SD, respectively of the analogous World Health Organization standards. Aim: To compare weight-for-height and BMI-for-age definitions for quantifying overnutrition burden. Methods: Theoretical consequences of ignoring age were evaluated by comparing, at varying height-for-age zscores, the age- and sex-specific cut-offs of BMI that would define overnutrition with these two metrics. Overnutrition prevalence was then compared in simulated populations (short, intermediate and tall) and real-life datasets from India. Results: In short (-2SD) children, the BMI cut-offs with weight-for-height criteria were lower in comparison to BMI-for-age till 7-8 months, but higher at later ages. In National Family Health Survey-4, India dataset (short population), overnutrition (>1SD) prevalence with weight-for-height was higher from 0-0.5 years (exclusive breastfeeding age), but lower at subsequent ages. The prevalence difference (weight-for-height - BMI-for-age) in 0.5-5 years was -2.26% (6.57% vs 8.83%); this attenuated in 0-5 years (-1.55%; 7.23% vs 8.78%). The discrepancy was maximal for stunted children and was lower in girls. A similar pattern, of lower magnitude, was observed for overweight (>2SD) comparison. In intermediate and tall populations, there were no meaningful differences. Conclusion: The two definitions produce cut-offs, and hence estimates of overnutrition, that differ with the age, sex, and height of under-five children. The relative invariance, with age and height, of BMI-for-age, favours its use.
Text
Rajeev Indian Pediatrics
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 5 November 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 November 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 483333
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483333
ISSN: 0019-6061
PURE UUID: 278e95ac-118b-445b-b0c4-000cc21e9bd6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Oct 2023 04:17
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:36
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
L. Naga Rajeev
Author:
Monika Saini
Author:
Ashish Kumar
Author:
H. P. Sachdev
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics