The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The role of general vs pandemic-specific paranoid ideation in the use of recommended health behaviors and vaccine willingness during a worldwide pandemic: an international study in the general public

The role of general vs pandemic-specific paranoid ideation in the use of recommended health behaviors and vaccine willingness during a worldwide pandemic: an international study in the general public
The role of general vs pandemic-specific paranoid ideation in the use of recommended health behaviors and vaccine willingness during a worldwide pandemic: an international study in the general public
Background: the public's adherence to recommended COVID-19 preventative behaviors, including vaccinations and social distancing, has been low in certain groups and has contributed to many preventable deaths worldwide. An examination of general and pandemic-specific aspects of nonclinical paranoid ideation may aid in the understanding of the public's response to the pandemic, given that it is a global threat event.

Methods: a representative international sample of general adults (N = 2,510) from five international sites were recruited with stratified quota sampling. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine the relationships among general paranoid ideation, pandemic paranoid ideation (interpersonal mistrust, conspiratorial thinking, and persecutory threat), general distress (depression, anxiety), vaccine willingness, and other preventative behaviors (masking, social distancing, hygiene).

Results: although general distress and paranoid ideation were associated with vaccination willingness and preventative behaviors, their effects were inconsistent or weak. Pandemic paranoid ideation showed robust direct and indirect effects that differentially predicted COVID-19 preventative behaviors, with higher interpersonal mistrust associated with higher adherence to all behaviors, higher conspiratorial thinking related to lower adherence to all behaviors, and higher persecutory threat related to higher vaccine willingness, but lower adherence to other preventative behaviors.

Conclusions: examination of pandemic-specific paranoid ideation leads to more precise prediction of the public's adherence to recommended health behaviors during the COVID-19 outbreak. This information could be used to inform intervention strategies for micro-targeting different subgroups with nonclinical paranoid thinking, as well as for improving responses to future pandemics and vaccination efforts for other common illnesses.
0022-3956
110-118
Gaudiano, Brandon A.
45587384-0015-496e-abd1-47a488a56cd3
Marks, Russell
d22f3381-13d7-403e-85da-ceab2d482660
Ellett, Lyn
96482ea6-04b6-4a50-a7ec-ae0a3abc20ca
So, Suzanne Ho-wai
c4777f36-4935-495a-9898-e56a714bbafa
Lincoln, Tania M.
21fd97c5-090f-4843-b1ea-2579b2582cf4
Morris, Eric M.J.
86aa0765-9aa1-4451-887d-c3f26efb3677
Kingston, Jessica L.
0a6d15b9-5390-4996-91c9-ef4be2bde1b7
Gaudiano, Brandon A.
45587384-0015-496e-abd1-47a488a56cd3
Marks, Russell
d22f3381-13d7-403e-85da-ceab2d482660
Ellett, Lyn
96482ea6-04b6-4a50-a7ec-ae0a3abc20ca
So, Suzanne Ho-wai
c4777f36-4935-495a-9898-e56a714bbafa
Lincoln, Tania M.
21fd97c5-090f-4843-b1ea-2579b2582cf4
Morris, Eric M.J.
86aa0765-9aa1-4451-887d-c3f26efb3677
Kingston, Jessica L.
0a6d15b9-5390-4996-91c9-ef4be2bde1b7

Gaudiano, Brandon A., Marks, Russell, Ellett, Lyn, So, Suzanne Ho-wai, Lincoln, Tania M., Morris, Eric M.J. and Kingston, Jessica L. (2023) The role of general vs pandemic-specific paranoid ideation in the use of recommended health behaviors and vaccine willingness during a worldwide pandemic: an international study in the general public. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 167, 110-118. (doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.10.014).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the public's adherence to recommended COVID-19 preventative behaviors, including vaccinations and social distancing, has been low in certain groups and has contributed to many preventable deaths worldwide. An examination of general and pandemic-specific aspects of nonclinical paranoid ideation may aid in the understanding of the public's response to the pandemic, given that it is a global threat event.

Methods: a representative international sample of general adults (N = 2,510) from five international sites were recruited with stratified quota sampling. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine the relationships among general paranoid ideation, pandemic paranoid ideation (interpersonal mistrust, conspiratorial thinking, and persecutory threat), general distress (depression, anxiety), vaccine willingness, and other preventative behaviors (masking, social distancing, hygiene).

Results: although general distress and paranoid ideation were associated with vaccination willingness and preventative behaviors, their effects were inconsistent or weak. Pandemic paranoid ideation showed robust direct and indirect effects that differentially predicted COVID-19 preventative behaviors, with higher interpersonal mistrust associated with higher adherence to all behaviors, higher conspiratorial thinking related to lower adherence to all behaviors, and higher persecutory threat related to higher vaccine willingness, but lower adherence to other preventative behaviors.

Conclusions: examination of pandemic-specific paranoid ideation leads to more precise prediction of the public's adherence to recommended health behaviors during the COVID-19 outbreak. This information could be used to inform intervention strategies for micro-targeting different subgroups with nonclinical paranoid thinking, as well as for improving responses to future pandemics and vaccination efforts for other common illnesses.

Text
pandemic paranoia 8-24-23 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 18 October 2024.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 October 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 October 2023
Published date: November 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: The authors received no funding from an external source. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Elsevier Ltd

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 483385
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483385
ISSN: 0022-3956
PURE UUID: 38cb8dd5-6bda-416b-8e9b-e373c92a4fe9
ORCID for Lyn Ellett: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6051-3604

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Oct 2023 12:34
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Brandon A. Gaudiano
Author: Russell Marks
Author: Lyn Ellett ORCID iD
Author: Suzanne Ho-wai So
Author: Tania M. Lincoln
Author: Eric M.J. Morris
Author: Jessica L. Kingston

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×