The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Upper limb activity in myoelectric prosthesis users is biased towards the intact limb and appears unrelated to goal-directed task performance

Upper limb activity in myoelectric prosthesis users is biased towards the intact limb and appears unrelated to goal-directed task performance
Upper limb activity in myoelectric prosthesis users is biased towards the intact limb and appears unrelated to goal-directed task performance

Studies of the effectiveness of prosthetic hands involve assessing user performance on functional tasks, typically collected in the lab, sometimes combined with self-report of real-world use. In this paper we compare real-world upper limb activity between a group of 20 myoelectric prosthesis users and 20 anatomically intact adults. Activity was measured from wrist-worn accelerometers over a 7-day period. The temporal patterns in upper limb activity are presented and the balance of activity between the two limbs quantified. We also evaluated the prosthesis users’ performance on a goal-directed task, characterised using measures including task success rate, completion time, gaze behaviour patterns, and kinematics (e.g. variability and patterns in hand aperture). Prosthesis users were heavily reliant on their intact limb during everyday life, in contrast to anatomically intact adults who demonstrated similar reliance on both upper limbs. There was no significant correlation between the amount of time a prosthesis was worn and reliance on the intact limb, and there was no significant correlation between either of these measures and any of the assessed kinematic and gaze-related measures of performance. We found participants who had been prescribed a prosthesis for longer to demonstrate more symmetry in their overall upper limb activity, although this was not reflected in the symmetry of unilateral limb use. With the exception of previously published case studies, this is the first report of real world upper limb activity in myoelectric prosthesis users and confirms the widely held belief that users are heavily reliant on their intact limb.

2045-2322
Chadwell, A.
c337930e-a6b5-43e3-8ca5-eed1d2d71340
Kenney, L.
83d42411-ccbe-4b21-828e-9abd9775e47d
Granat, M
73f58a52-fd38-4320-b749-f18d8c1d90e9
Thies, S.
233b0fa4-7a7d-4081-8e5b-5cb6126a8981
Head, J.
d3a0091d-aa75-49f1-9649-ff47809758fd
Galpin, A.
c3157315-5bd6-4123-9044-a379ebc7ae62
Baker, R.
9645fb5c-2a71-4e44-9f89-98cb432f8106
Kulkarni, J.
35f1fee3-880b-483a-a96e-a4753cb5ad09
Chadwell, A.
c337930e-a6b5-43e3-8ca5-eed1d2d71340
Kenney, L.
83d42411-ccbe-4b21-828e-9abd9775e47d
Granat, M
73f58a52-fd38-4320-b749-f18d8c1d90e9
Thies, S.
233b0fa4-7a7d-4081-8e5b-5cb6126a8981
Head, J.
d3a0091d-aa75-49f1-9649-ff47809758fd
Galpin, A.
c3157315-5bd6-4123-9044-a379ebc7ae62
Baker, R.
9645fb5c-2a71-4e44-9f89-98cb432f8106
Kulkarni, J.
35f1fee3-880b-483a-a96e-a4753cb5ad09

Chadwell, A., Kenney, L., Granat, M, Thies, S., Head, J., Galpin, A., Baker, R. and Kulkarni, J. (2018) Upper limb activity in myoelectric prosthesis users is biased towards the intact limb and appears unrelated to goal-directed task performance. Scientific Reports, 8 (1), [11084]. (doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29503-6).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Studies of the effectiveness of prosthetic hands involve assessing user performance on functional tasks, typically collected in the lab, sometimes combined with self-report of real-world use. In this paper we compare real-world upper limb activity between a group of 20 myoelectric prosthesis users and 20 anatomically intact adults. Activity was measured from wrist-worn accelerometers over a 7-day period. The temporal patterns in upper limb activity are presented and the balance of activity between the two limbs quantified. We also evaluated the prosthesis users’ performance on a goal-directed task, characterised using measures including task success rate, completion time, gaze behaviour patterns, and kinematics (e.g. variability and patterns in hand aperture). Prosthesis users were heavily reliant on their intact limb during everyday life, in contrast to anatomically intact adults who demonstrated similar reliance on both upper limbs. There was no significant correlation between the amount of time a prosthesis was worn and reliance on the intact limb, and there was no significant correlation between either of these measures and any of the assessed kinematic and gaze-related measures of performance. We found participants who had been prescribed a prosthesis for longer to demonstrate more symmetry in their overall upper limb activity, although this was not reflected in the symmetry of unilateral limb use. With the exception of previously published case studies, this is the first report of real world upper limb activity in myoelectric prosthesis users and confirms the widely held belief that users are heavily reliant on their intact limb.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 December 2018
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2018, The Author(s).

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 483478
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483478
ISSN: 2045-2322
PURE UUID: b172c48c-ee00-4c2a-835d-2fae7e15e0b7
ORCID for A. Chadwell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9101-5202

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Oct 2023 18:05
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:12

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A. Chadwell ORCID iD
Author: L. Kenney
Author: M Granat
Author: S. Thies
Author: J. Head
Author: A. Galpin
Author: R. Baker
Author: J. Kulkarni

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×