The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A critical assessment of Kriging model variants for high-fidelity uncertainty quantification in dynamics of composite shells

A critical assessment of Kriging model variants for high-fidelity uncertainty quantification in dynamics of composite shells
A critical assessment of Kriging model variants for high-fidelity uncertainty quantification in dynamics of composite shells

This paper presents a critical comparative assessment of Kriging model variants for surrogate based uncertainty propagation considering stochastic natural frequencies of composite doubly curved shells. The five Kriging model variants studied here are: Ordinary Kriging, Universal Kriging based on pseudo-likelihood estimator, Blind Kriging, Co-Kriging and Universal Kriging based on marginal likelihood estimator. First three stochastic natural frequencies of the composite shell are analysed by using a finite element model that includes the effects of transverse shear deformation based on Mindlin’s theory in conjunction with a layer-wise random variable approach. The comparative assessment is carried out to address the accuracy and computational efficiency of five Kriging model variants. Comparative performance of different covariance functions is also studied. Subsequently the effect of noise in uncertainty propagation is addressed by using the Stochastic Kriging. Representative results are presented for both individual and combined stochasticity in layer-wise input parameters to address performance of various Kriging variants for low dimensional and relatively higher dimensional input parameter spaces. The error estimation and convergence studies are conducted with respect to original Monte Carlo Simulation to justify merit of the present investigation. The study reveals that Universal Kriging coupled with marginal likelihood estimate yields the most accurate results, followed by Co-Kriging and Blind Kriging. As far as computational efficiency of the Kriging models is concerned, it is observed that for high-dimensional problems, CPU time required for building the Co-Kriging model is significantly less as compared to other Kriging variants.

1134-3060
495-518
Mukhopadhyay, T.
2ae18ab0-7477-40ac-ae22-76face7be475
Chakraborty, S.
de0a7526-18ed-4a7b-9f1d-28378f65d9d8
Dey, S.
1ac48858-fa58-4c71-b681-94ee07efe293
Adhikari, S.
82960baf-916c-496e-aa85-fc7de09a1626
Chowdhury, R.
0e309fcb-059f-4630-b6e4-3823c67c1dad
Mukhopadhyay, T.
2ae18ab0-7477-40ac-ae22-76face7be475
Chakraborty, S.
de0a7526-18ed-4a7b-9f1d-28378f65d9d8
Dey, S.
1ac48858-fa58-4c71-b681-94ee07efe293
Adhikari, S.
82960baf-916c-496e-aa85-fc7de09a1626
Chowdhury, R.
0e309fcb-059f-4630-b6e4-3823c67c1dad

Mukhopadhyay, T., Chakraborty, S., Dey, S., Adhikari, S. and Chowdhury, R. (2017) A critical assessment of Kriging model variants for high-fidelity uncertainty quantification in dynamics of composite shells. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 24 (3), 495-518. (doi:10.1007/s11831-016-9178-z).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper presents a critical comparative assessment of Kriging model variants for surrogate based uncertainty propagation considering stochastic natural frequencies of composite doubly curved shells. The five Kriging model variants studied here are: Ordinary Kriging, Universal Kriging based on pseudo-likelihood estimator, Blind Kriging, Co-Kriging and Universal Kriging based on marginal likelihood estimator. First three stochastic natural frequencies of the composite shell are analysed by using a finite element model that includes the effects of transverse shear deformation based on Mindlin’s theory in conjunction with a layer-wise random variable approach. The comparative assessment is carried out to address the accuracy and computational efficiency of five Kriging model variants. Comparative performance of different covariance functions is also studied. Subsequently the effect of noise in uncertainty propagation is addressed by using the Stochastic Kriging. Representative results are presented for both individual and combined stochasticity in layer-wise input parameters to address performance of various Kriging variants for low dimensional and relatively higher dimensional input parameter spaces. The error estimation and convergence studies are conducted with respect to original Monte Carlo Simulation to justify merit of the present investigation. The study reveals that Universal Kriging coupled with marginal likelihood estimate yields the most accurate results, followed by Co-Kriging and Blind Kriging. As far as computational efficiency of the Kriging models is concerned, it is observed that for high-dimensional problems, CPU time required for building the Co-Kriging model is significantly less as compared to other Kriging variants.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 July 2017
Additional Information: Funding Information: TM acknowledges the financial support from Swansea University through the award of Zienkiewicz Scholarship during the period of this work. SC acknowledges the support of MHRD, Government of India for the financial support provided during this work. SA acknowledges the financial support from The Royal Society of London through the Wolfson Research Merit award. RC acknowledges the support of The Royal Society through Newton Alumni Funding. Publisher Copyright: © 2016, CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 483547
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483547
ISSN: 1134-3060
PURE UUID: 3b0dddfe-dbc1-4c81-ae1b-eebfb87aaf7a
ORCID for T. Mukhopadhyay: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0778-6515

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Nov 2023 17:59
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: T. Mukhopadhyay ORCID iD
Author: S. Chakraborty
Author: S. Dey
Author: S. Adhikari
Author: R. Chowdhury

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×