The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Systematic differences in bucket sea surface temperatures caused by misclassification of engine room intake measurements

Systematic differences in bucket sea surface temperatures caused by misclassification of engine room intake measurements
Systematic differences in bucket sea surface temperatures caused by misclassification of engine room intake measurements
Differences in sea surface temperature (SST) biases among groups of bucket measurements in the International Comprehensive Ocean–Atmosphere Dataset, version 3.0 (ICOADS3.0), were recently identified that introduce offsets of as much as 1°C and have first-order implications for regional temperature trends. In this study, the origin of these groupwise offsets is explored through covariation between offsets and diurnal cycle amplitudes. Examination of an extended bucket model leads to expectations for offsets and amplitudes to covary in either sign, whereas misclassified engine room intake (ERI) temperatures invariably lead to negative covariance on account of ERI measurements being warmer and having a smaller diurnal amplitude. An analysis of ICOADS3.0 SST measurements that are inferred to come from buckets indicates that offsets after the 1930s primarily result from the misclassification of ERI measurements in points of five lines of evidence. 1) Prior to when ERI measurements become available in the 1930s, offset–amplitude covariance is weak and generally positive, whereas covariance is stronger and generally negative subsequently. 2) The introduction of ERI measurements in the 1930s is accompanied by a wider range of offsets and diurnal amplitudes across groups, with 3) approximately 20% of estimated diurnal amplitudes being significantly smaller than buoy and drifter observations. 4) Regressions of offsets versus amplitudes intersect independently determined end-member values of ERI measurements. 5) Offset-amplitude slopes become less negative across all regions and seasons between 1960 and 1980, when ERI temperatures were independently determined to become less warmly biased. These results highlight the importance of accurately determining measurement procedures for bias corrections and reducing uncertainty in historical SST estimates.
0894-8755
7735–7753
Chan, Duo
4c1278dc-7f39-4b67-b1cd-3f81f55f4906
Huybers, Peter
48e9a517-aa2a-40f1-96ef-06d76b19291c
Chan, Duo
4c1278dc-7f39-4b67-b1cd-3f81f55f4906
Huybers, Peter
48e9a517-aa2a-40f1-96ef-06d76b19291c

Chan, Duo and Huybers, Peter (2020) Systematic differences in bucket sea surface temperatures caused by misclassification of engine room intake measurements. Journal of Climate, 33 (18), 7735–7753. (doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0972.1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Differences in sea surface temperature (SST) biases among groups of bucket measurements in the International Comprehensive Ocean–Atmosphere Dataset, version 3.0 (ICOADS3.0), were recently identified that introduce offsets of as much as 1°C and have first-order implications for regional temperature trends. In this study, the origin of these groupwise offsets is explored through covariation between offsets and diurnal cycle amplitudes. Examination of an extended bucket model leads to expectations for offsets and amplitudes to covary in either sign, whereas misclassified engine room intake (ERI) temperatures invariably lead to negative covariance on account of ERI measurements being warmer and having a smaller diurnal amplitude. An analysis of ICOADS3.0 SST measurements that are inferred to come from buckets indicates that offsets after the 1930s primarily result from the misclassification of ERI measurements in points of five lines of evidence. 1) Prior to when ERI measurements become available in the 1930s, offset–amplitude covariance is weak and generally positive, whereas covariance is stronger and generally negative subsequently. 2) The introduction of ERI measurements in the 1930s is accompanied by a wider range of offsets and diurnal amplitudes across groups, with 3) approximately 20% of estimated diurnal amplitudes being significantly smaller than buoy and drifter observations. 4) Regressions of offsets versus amplitudes intersect independently determined end-member values of ERI measurements. 5) Offset-amplitude slopes become less negative across all regions and seasons between 1960 and 1980, when ERI temperatures were independently determined to become less warmly biased. These results highlight the importance of accurately determining measurement procedures for bias corrections and reducing uncertainty in historical SST estimates.

Text
clim-jcliD190972 - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (3MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 May 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 August 2020
Published date: 15 September 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 483812
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483812
ISSN: 0894-8755
PURE UUID: b53f45b6-c606-4867-8d29-cdb7e0f19848
ORCID for Duo Chan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8573-5115

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Nov 2023 18:09
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Duo Chan ORCID iD
Author: Peter Huybers

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×