Modeling (in)congruence between dependent variables: the directional and nondirectional difference (DNDD) framework
Modeling (in)congruence between dependent variables: the directional and nondirectional difference (DNDD) framework
This article proposes a new approach to modeling the antecedents of incongruence between 2 dependent variables. In this approach, incongruence is decomposed into 2 orthogonal components representing directional and nondirectional difference (DNDD). Nondirectional difference is further divided into components representing shared and unique variability. We review previous approaches to modeling antecedents of difference, including the use of arithmetic, absolute, and squared differences, as well as the approaches of Edwards (1995) and Cheung (2009). Based on 2 studies, we demonstrate the advantages of DNDD approach compared with other methods. In the first study, we use a Monte Carlo simulation to demonstrate the circumstances under which each type of difference arises, and we compare the insights revealed by each approach. In the second study, we provide an illustrative example of DNDD approach using a field dataset. In the discussion, we review the strengths and limitations of our approach and propose several practical applications. Our article proposes 2 extensions to the basic DNDD approach, including modeling difference with a known target or “true” value, and using multilevel analysis to model nondirectional difference with exchangeable ratings.
1013-1035
Bednall, T.C.
84b3e35e-17ea-4ec3-9dbe-349fce454744
Zhang, Y.
3a7eb0ef-8c03-419f-abdf-4f11f9d097ea
Bednall, T.C.
84b3e35e-17ea-4ec3-9dbe-349fce454744
Zhang, Y.
3a7eb0ef-8c03-419f-abdf-4f11f9d097ea
Bednall, T.C. and Zhang, Y.
(2020)
Modeling (in)congruence between dependent variables: the directional and nondirectional difference (DNDD) framework.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 105 (9), .
(doi:10.1037/apl0000475).
Abstract
This article proposes a new approach to modeling the antecedents of incongruence between 2 dependent variables. In this approach, incongruence is decomposed into 2 orthogonal components representing directional and nondirectional difference (DNDD). Nondirectional difference is further divided into components representing shared and unique variability. We review previous approaches to modeling antecedents of difference, including the use of arithmetic, absolute, and squared differences, as well as the approaches of Edwards (1995) and Cheung (2009). Based on 2 studies, we demonstrate the advantages of DNDD approach compared with other methods. In the first study, we use a Monte Carlo simulation to demonstrate the circumstances under which each type of difference arises, and we compare the insights revealed by each approach. In the second study, we provide an illustrative example of DNDD approach using a field dataset. In the discussion, we review the strengths and limitations of our approach and propose several practical applications. Our article proposes 2 extensions to the basic DNDD approach, including modeling difference with a known target or “true” value, and using multilevel analysis to model nondirectional difference with exchangeable ratings.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 12 November 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 483827
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483827
ISSN: 0021-9010
PURE UUID: 00429c3d-3b55-4cdd-8674-e54a6c319051
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Nov 2023 18:19
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:13
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
T.C. Bednall
Author:
Y. Zhang
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics