Prevalence statistics of hearing loss in adults: harnessing spatial big data to estimate patterns and trends
Prevalence statistics of hearing loss in adults: harnessing spatial big data to estimate patterns and trends
Background: Hearing loss is estimated to affect over eight million adults aged over 50 in England. These estimates are based on the prevalence data reported in the ‘Hearing in Adults’ study by Davis, who collected audiological data for 1,538 subjects 50 years old and above in the 1980s. The prevalence (%) per age group from this study’s samples is being applied to the most recent English census. We aimed to (a) explore regional patterns and trends of hearing loss in a representative longitudinal prospective cohort study of the English older population, and (b) identify potential regional differences with the current prevalence estimates.
Methods: We utilised the full dataset (74,699 person-years) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). We used local spatial statistics to analyse spatial distributions, patterns and trends of the geographical data, examining both self-reported and objective hearing data. The objectively identified hearing loss was defined as greater than 35 dB HL at 3.0 kHz, in the better hearing ear, as measured by a handheld audiometric screening device (HearCheck Screener).
Results: There was a wide variation in hearing loss prevalence in representative samples from different regions in England with similar age profiles (Fig 1.). In a period of 15 years (2002-2017) the increase rate of hearing loss ranged between regions from 3.2% to 45%. The Getis-Ord Gi* spatial statistic showed marked regional variability, and hearing health inequalities between Northern and Southern England that were previously unknown.
Conclusion: The profound multidisciplinary professional and experimental care in the ‘Hearing in Adults’ study by Davis is broadly recognised; however, our study showed that this data does not remain valid and generalisable. The time of small-scale research should be consigned to the past; applying computational approaches in audiology might offer promising solutions to generate large-scale epidemiological inferences to improve population’s hearing health.
Tsimpida, Dalia
2fff4517-3c8e-445b-8646-7f645fa36b0a
Panagioti, Maria
e6203164-fc28-408c-8219-66b21540f044
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
0a21ca6f-4516-45f8-80fc-b10dd7db6780
25 June 2021
Tsimpida, Dalia
2fff4517-3c8e-445b-8646-7f645fa36b0a
Panagioti, Maria
e6203164-fc28-408c-8219-66b21540f044
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
0a21ca6f-4516-45f8-80fc-b10dd7db6780
Tsimpida, Dalia, Panagioti, Maria and Kontopantelis, Evangelos
(2021)
Prevalence statistics of hearing loss in adults: harnessing spatial big data to estimate patterns and trends.
Virtual Conference on Computational Audiology, , virtual.
25 Jun 2021.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Other)
Abstract
Background: Hearing loss is estimated to affect over eight million adults aged over 50 in England. These estimates are based on the prevalence data reported in the ‘Hearing in Adults’ study by Davis, who collected audiological data for 1,538 subjects 50 years old and above in the 1980s. The prevalence (%) per age group from this study’s samples is being applied to the most recent English census. We aimed to (a) explore regional patterns and trends of hearing loss in a representative longitudinal prospective cohort study of the English older population, and (b) identify potential regional differences with the current prevalence estimates.
Methods: We utilised the full dataset (74,699 person-years) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). We used local spatial statistics to analyse spatial distributions, patterns and trends of the geographical data, examining both self-reported and objective hearing data. The objectively identified hearing loss was defined as greater than 35 dB HL at 3.0 kHz, in the better hearing ear, as measured by a handheld audiometric screening device (HearCheck Screener).
Results: There was a wide variation in hearing loss prevalence in representative samples from different regions in England with similar age profiles (Fig 1.). In a period of 15 years (2002-2017) the increase rate of hearing loss ranged between regions from 3.2% to 45%. The Getis-Ord Gi* spatial statistic showed marked regional variability, and hearing health inequalities between Northern and Southern England that were previously unknown.
Conclusion: The profound multidisciplinary professional and experimental care in the ‘Hearing in Adults’ study by Davis is broadly recognised; however, our study showed that this data does not remain valid and generalisable. The time of small-scale research should be consigned to the past; applying computational approaches in audiology might offer promising solutions to generate large-scale epidemiological inferences to improve population’s hearing health.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 25 June 2021
Venue - Dates:
Virtual Conference on Computational Audiology, , virtual, 2021-06-25 - 2021-06-25
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 483849
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483849
PURE UUID: 3bdc477d-0a6c-4fd5-907a-ea247208945b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Nov 2023 19:29
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 02:16
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Dalia Tsimpida
Author:
Maria Panagioti
Author:
Evangelos Kontopantelis
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics