The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model

Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model
Background: we aimed to understand urgent and emergency care pathways for older people and develop a decision support tool using a mixed methods study design.

Objective(s), study design, settings and participants: work package 1 identified best practice through a review of reviews, patient, carer and professional interviews. Work package 2 involved qualitative case studies of selected urgent and emergency care pathways in the Yorkshire and Humber region. Work package 3 analysed linked databases describing urgent and emergency care pathways identifying patient, provider and pathway factors that explain differences in outcomes and costs. Work package 4 developed a system dynamics tool to compare emergency interventions.

Results: a total of 18 reviews summarising 128 primary studies found that integrated social and medical care, screening and assessment, follow-up and monitoring of service outcomes were important. Forty patient/carer participants described emergency department attendances; most reported a reluctance to attend. Participants emphasised the importance of being treated with dignity, timely and accurate information provision and involvement in decision-making. Receiving care in a calm environment with attention to personal comfort and basic physical needs were key. Patient goals included diagnosis and resolution, well-planned discharge home and retaining physical function.Participants perceived many of these goals of care were not attained. A total of 21 professional participants were interviewed and 23 participated in focus groups, largely confirming the review evidence. Implementation challenges identified included the urgent and emergency care environment, organisational approaches to service development, staff skills and resources.Work package 2 involved 45 interviews and 30 hours of observation in four contrasting emergency departments. Key themes relating to implementation included:• intervention-related◦ staff: frailty mindset and behaviours◦ resources: workforce, space, and physical environment◦ operational influences: referral criteria, frailty assessment, operating hours, transport.• context-related◦ links with community, social and primary care◦ organisation and management support◦ COVID-19 pandemic.• approaches to implementation◦ service/quality improvement networks◦ engaging staff and building relationships◦ education about frailty◦ evidence.The linked databases in work package 3 comprised 359,945 older people and 1,035,045 observations. The most powerful predictors of four-hour wait and transfer to hospital were age, previous attendance, out-of-hours attendance and call handler designation of urgency. Drawing upon the previous work packages and working closely with a wide range of patient and professional stakeholders, we developed an system dynamics tool that modelled five evidence-based urgent and emergency care interventions and their impact on the whole system in terms of reducing admissions, re-admissions, and hospital related mortality.  
Limitations: across the reviews there was incomplete reporting of interventions. People living with severe frailty and from ethnic minorities were under-represented in the patient/carer interviews. The linked databases did not include patient reported outcomes. The system dynamics model was limited to evidence-based interventions, which could not be modelled conjointly.

Conclusions: we have reaffirmed the poor outcomes frequently experienced by many older people living with urgent care needs. We have identified interventions that could improve patient and service outcomes, as well as implementation tools and strategies to help including clinicians, service managers and commissioners improve emergency care for older people.

Future work: future work will focus on refining the system dynamics model, specifically including patient-reported outcome measures and pre-hospital services for older people living with frailty who have urgent care needs.
Frailty; older people; emergency department
2755-0079
1-183
Conroy, Simon
cf48104a-1618-4499-8e77-edcffdf39353
Brailsford, Sally
634585ff-c828-46ca-b33d-7ac017dda04f
Burton, Christopher
470b0fdc-f857-43f1-85d5-7cc3e94d7f51
England, Tracey
8f99b32a-1670-4e20-b6c6-30ae96940ca2
Lalseta, Jagruti
abc6dc32-0bc4-47bb-91c7-bc7d75cc9db6
Martin, Graham
b4286d6c-c755-47f8-b2c5-31eeb98683fc
Mason, Suzanne
47319da9-4302-4180-a031-c2c6363c7d98
Maynou, Laia
d2146913-de7d-4b23-9f47-b0ac938ea684
Phelps, Kay
fba7825d-7983-43ea-b41c-4d1f5704d2f8
Preston, Louise
a8a0990e-ad11-4a4e-8835-44bf44395d32
Regan, Emma
b7a1852c-a234-42aa-8089-9d9c6fcab880
Riley, Peter
764b9879-fa0a-4078-8426-093940958c4c
Street, Andrew
c3d784f3-18a8-4d70-85e7-acc8e1098ccb
van Oppen, James
2df6d777-0cb8-4c7d-908f-dc7320025e22
Conroy, Simon
cf48104a-1618-4499-8e77-edcffdf39353
Brailsford, Sally
634585ff-c828-46ca-b33d-7ac017dda04f
Burton, Christopher
470b0fdc-f857-43f1-85d5-7cc3e94d7f51
England, Tracey
8f99b32a-1670-4e20-b6c6-30ae96940ca2
Lalseta, Jagruti
abc6dc32-0bc4-47bb-91c7-bc7d75cc9db6
Martin, Graham
b4286d6c-c755-47f8-b2c5-31eeb98683fc
Mason, Suzanne
47319da9-4302-4180-a031-c2c6363c7d98
Maynou, Laia
d2146913-de7d-4b23-9f47-b0ac938ea684
Phelps, Kay
fba7825d-7983-43ea-b41c-4d1f5704d2f8
Preston, Louise
a8a0990e-ad11-4a4e-8835-44bf44395d32
Regan, Emma
b7a1852c-a234-42aa-8089-9d9c6fcab880
Riley, Peter
764b9879-fa0a-4078-8426-093940958c4c
Street, Andrew
c3d784f3-18a8-4d70-85e7-acc8e1098ccb
van Oppen, James
2df6d777-0cb8-4c7d-908f-dc7320025e22

Conroy, Simon, Brailsford, Sally, Burton, Christopher, England, Tracey, Lalseta, Jagruti, Martin, Graham, Mason, Suzanne, Maynou, Laia, Phelps, Kay, Preston, Louise, Regan, Emma, Riley, Peter, Street, Andrew and van Oppen, James (2023) Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model. Health and Social Care Delivery Research, 11 (14), 1-183. (doi:10.3310/NLCT5104).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: we aimed to understand urgent and emergency care pathways for older people and develop a decision support tool using a mixed methods study design.

Objective(s), study design, settings and participants: work package 1 identified best practice through a review of reviews, patient, carer and professional interviews. Work package 2 involved qualitative case studies of selected urgent and emergency care pathways in the Yorkshire and Humber region. Work package 3 analysed linked databases describing urgent and emergency care pathways identifying patient, provider and pathway factors that explain differences in outcomes and costs. Work package 4 developed a system dynamics tool to compare emergency interventions.

Results: a total of 18 reviews summarising 128 primary studies found that integrated social and medical care, screening and assessment, follow-up and monitoring of service outcomes were important. Forty patient/carer participants described emergency department attendances; most reported a reluctance to attend. Participants emphasised the importance of being treated with dignity, timely and accurate information provision and involvement in decision-making. Receiving care in a calm environment with attention to personal comfort and basic physical needs were key. Patient goals included diagnosis and resolution, well-planned discharge home and retaining physical function.Participants perceived many of these goals of care were not attained. A total of 21 professional participants were interviewed and 23 participated in focus groups, largely confirming the review evidence. Implementation challenges identified included the urgent and emergency care environment, organisational approaches to service development, staff skills and resources.Work package 2 involved 45 interviews and 30 hours of observation in four contrasting emergency departments. Key themes relating to implementation included:• intervention-related◦ staff: frailty mindset and behaviours◦ resources: workforce, space, and physical environment◦ operational influences: referral criteria, frailty assessment, operating hours, transport.• context-related◦ links with community, social and primary care◦ organisation and management support◦ COVID-19 pandemic.• approaches to implementation◦ service/quality improvement networks◦ engaging staff and building relationships◦ education about frailty◦ evidence.The linked databases in work package 3 comprised 359,945 older people and 1,035,045 observations. The most powerful predictors of four-hour wait and transfer to hospital were age, previous attendance, out-of-hours attendance and call handler designation of urgency. Drawing upon the previous work packages and working closely with a wide range of patient and professional stakeholders, we developed an system dynamics tool that modelled five evidence-based urgent and emergency care interventions and their impact on the whole system in terms of reducing admissions, re-admissions, and hospital related mortality.  
Limitations: across the reviews there was incomplete reporting of interventions. People living with severe frailty and from ethnic minorities were under-represented in the patient/carer interviews. The linked databases did not include patient reported outcomes. The system dynamics model was limited to evidence-based interventions, which could not be modelled conjointly.

Conclusions: we have reaffirmed the poor outcomes frequently experienced by many older people living with urgent care needs. We have identified interventions that could improve patient and service outcomes, as well as implementation tools and strategies to help including clinicians, service managers and commissioners improve emergency care for older people.

Future work: future work will focus on refining the system dynamics model, specifically including patient-reported outcome measures and pre-hospital services for older people living with frailty who have urgent care needs.

Text
3042862 (1) - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (4MB)

More information

Published date: September 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, the HS?R programme or the ?epartment of Health and Social Care. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors, those of the NHS, the NIHR, the HS?R programme or the ?epartment of Health and Social Care. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Conroy et al.
Keywords: Frailty; older people; emergency department

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 483860
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483860
ISSN: 2755-0079
PURE UUID: 74955fe2-970c-4c0e-aa0e-fd3920f03b74
ORCID for Sally Brailsford: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6665-8230
ORCID for Tracey England: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7565-4189

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Nov 2023 17:45
Last modified: 18 Jun 2024 02:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Simon Conroy
Author: Christopher Burton
Author: Tracey England ORCID iD
Author: Jagruti Lalseta
Author: Graham Martin
Author: Suzanne Mason
Author: Laia Maynou
Author: Kay Phelps
Author: Louise Preston
Author: Emma Regan
Author: Peter Riley
Author: Andrew Street
Author: James van Oppen

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×