The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Adjustable prosthetic sockets: a systematic review of industrial and research design characteristics and their justifications

Adjustable prosthetic sockets: a systematic review of industrial and research design characteristics and their justifications
Adjustable prosthetic sockets: a systematic review of industrial and research design characteristics and their justifications
Background: the prosthetic socket is a key component that influences prosthesis satisfaction, with a poorly fitting prosthetic socket linked to prosthesis abandonment and reduced community participation. This paper reviews adjustable socket designs, as they have the potential to improve prosthetic fit and comfort through accommodating residual limb volume fluctuations and alleviating undue socket pressure.

Methods: systematic literature and patent searches were conducted across multiple databases to identify articles and patents that discussed adjustable prosthetic sockets. The patents were used to find companies, organisations, and institutions who currently sell adjustable sockets or who are developing devices.

Results: 50 literature articles and 63 patents were identified for inclusion, representing 35 different designs used in literature and 16 commercially available products. Adjustable sockets are becoming more prevalent with 73% of publications (literature, patents, and news) occurring within the last ten years. Two key design characteristics were identified: principle of adjustability (inflatable bladders, moveable panels, circumferential adjustment, variable length), and surface form (conformable, rigid multi-DOF, and rigid single DOF). Inflatable bladders contributed to 40% of literature used designs with only one identified commercially available design (n = 16) using this approach. Whereas circumferential adjustment designs covered 75% of identified industry designs compared to only 36% of literature devices. Clinical studies were generally small in size and only 17.6% of them assessed a commercially available socket.

Discussion: there are clear differences in the design focus taken by industry and researchers, with justification for choice of design and range of adjustment often being unclear. Whilst comfort is often reported as improved with an adjustable socket, the rationale behind this is not often discussed, and small study sizes reduce the outcome viability. Many adjustable sockets lack appropriate safety features to limit over or under tightening, which may present a risk of tissue damage or provide inadequate coupling, affecting function and satisfaction. Furthermore, the relationship between design and comfort or function are rarely investigated and remain a significant gap in the literature. Finally, this review highlights the need for improved collaboration between academia and industry, with a strong disconnect observed between commercial devices and published research studies.
Adjustable socket, Adjustable-volume, Artificial limb, Prosthesis design, Prosthetic, Prosthetic interface, Prosthetic socket, Residual limb, Socket, Systematic review
1743-0003
Baldock, Mchael
531a26c2-389a-497a-87e7-4f0a9cadced1
Pickard, Nicolaas
ef4dc960-7fc4-491a-926a-71c7bfefa65f
Prince, Michael
5a94c72a-b8a8-4185-a170-4463163fc502
Kirkwood, Sarah
5f8d6981-4837-45e5-ab34-527189569642
Chadwell, Alix
c337930e-a6b5-43e3-8ca5-eed1d2d71340
Howard, Dave
3c53cf75-3c6f-49a0-b260-82964cc24351
Dickinson, Alex
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Kenney, Laurence
83d42411-ccbe-4b21-828e-9abd9775e47d
Gill, Niamh
4ea49ba1-1c5d-415a-ab29-d9443f79ce61
Curtin, Sam
4ea092e1-a77e-4517-af5b-8d85b9eddac5
Baldock, Mchael
531a26c2-389a-497a-87e7-4f0a9cadced1
Pickard, Nicolaas
ef4dc960-7fc4-491a-926a-71c7bfefa65f
Prince, Michael
5a94c72a-b8a8-4185-a170-4463163fc502
Kirkwood, Sarah
5f8d6981-4837-45e5-ab34-527189569642
Chadwell, Alix
c337930e-a6b5-43e3-8ca5-eed1d2d71340
Howard, Dave
3c53cf75-3c6f-49a0-b260-82964cc24351
Dickinson, Alex
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Kenney, Laurence
83d42411-ccbe-4b21-828e-9abd9775e47d
Gill, Niamh
4ea49ba1-1c5d-415a-ab29-d9443f79ce61
Curtin, Sam
4ea092e1-a77e-4517-af5b-8d85b9eddac5

Baldock, Mchael, Pickard, Nicolaas, Prince, Michael, Kirkwood, Sarah, Chadwell, Alix, Howard, Dave, Dickinson, Alex, Kenney, Laurence, Gill, Niamh and Curtin, Sam (2023) Adjustable prosthetic sockets: a systematic review of industrial and research design characteristics and their justifications. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 20 (1), [147]. (doi:10.1186/s12984-023-01270-0).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the prosthetic socket is a key component that influences prosthesis satisfaction, with a poorly fitting prosthetic socket linked to prosthesis abandonment and reduced community participation. This paper reviews adjustable socket designs, as they have the potential to improve prosthetic fit and comfort through accommodating residual limb volume fluctuations and alleviating undue socket pressure.

Methods: systematic literature and patent searches were conducted across multiple databases to identify articles and patents that discussed adjustable prosthetic sockets. The patents were used to find companies, organisations, and institutions who currently sell adjustable sockets or who are developing devices.

Results: 50 literature articles and 63 patents were identified for inclusion, representing 35 different designs used in literature and 16 commercially available products. Adjustable sockets are becoming more prevalent with 73% of publications (literature, patents, and news) occurring within the last ten years. Two key design characteristics were identified: principle of adjustability (inflatable bladders, moveable panels, circumferential adjustment, variable length), and surface form (conformable, rigid multi-DOF, and rigid single DOF). Inflatable bladders contributed to 40% of literature used designs with only one identified commercially available design (n = 16) using this approach. Whereas circumferential adjustment designs covered 75% of identified industry designs compared to only 36% of literature devices. Clinical studies were generally small in size and only 17.6% of them assessed a commercially available socket.

Discussion: there are clear differences in the design focus taken by industry and researchers, with justification for choice of design and range of adjustment often being unclear. Whilst comfort is often reported as improved with an adjustable socket, the rationale behind this is not often discussed, and small study sizes reduce the outcome viability. Many adjustable sockets lack appropriate safety features to limit over or under tightening, which may present a risk of tissue damage or provide inadequate coupling, affecting function and satisfaction. Furthermore, the relationship between design and comfort or function are rarely investigated and remain a significant gap in the literature. Finally, this review highlights the need for improved collaboration between academia and industry, with a strong disconnect observed between commercial devices and published research studies.

Text
s12984-023-01270-0 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 October 2023
Published date: 6 November 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: We thank the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/S02249X/1) for funding this research. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).
Keywords: Adjustable socket, Adjustable-volume, Artificial limb, Prosthesis design, Prosthetic, Prosthetic interface, Prosthetic socket, Residual limb, Socket, Systematic review

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 484104
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/484104
ISSN: 1743-0003
PURE UUID: b9b547c2-d0e9-4d50-892c-ae942e607386
ORCID for Alix Chadwell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9101-5202
ORCID for Alex Dickinson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-1944

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Nov 2023 17:51
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:12

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mchael Baldock
Author: Nicolaas Pickard
Author: Michael Prince
Author: Sarah Kirkwood
Author: Alix Chadwell ORCID iD
Author: Dave Howard
Author: Alex Dickinson ORCID iD
Author: Laurence Kenney
Author: Niamh Gill
Author: Sam Curtin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×