The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Longitudinal profiles of semantic impairment for living and nonliving concepts in dementia of Alzheimer's type

Longitudinal profiles of semantic impairment for living and nonliving concepts in dementia of Alzheimer's type
Longitudinal profiles of semantic impairment for living and nonliving concepts in dementia of Alzheimer's type
Two types of theoretical account have been proposed to explain the phenomenon of category-specific impairment in tests of semantic memory: One stresses the importance of different cortical regions to the representation of living and nonliving categories, while the other emphasize the importance of statistical relationships among features of concepts belonging to these two broad semantic domains. Theories of the latter kind predict that the direction of a domain advantage will be determined in large part by the overall damage to the semantic system, and that the profiles of patients with progressive impairments of semantic memory are likely to include a point at which an advantage for one domain changes to an advantage for the other. The present series of three studies employed semantic test data from two separate cohorts of patients with probable dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT) to look for evidence of such a crossover. In the first study, longitudinal test scores from a cohort of 58 patients were examined to confirm the presence of progressive semantic deterioration in this group. In the second study, Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on serial naming responses and plotted separately for items belonging to living and nonliving domains indicated that the representations of living concepts (as measured by naming) deteriorated at a consistently and significantly faster rate than those of nonliving concepts. A third study, carried out to look in detail at the performance of mildly affected patients, employed an additional cross-sectional cohort of 20 patients with mild DAT and utilized a graded naming assessment. This study also revealed no evidence for a crossover in the advantage of one domain over the other as a function of disease severity. Taken together with the model of anatomical progression in DAT based on the work of Braak and Braak (1991), these findings are interpreted as evidence for the importance of regional cerebral anatomy to the genesis of semantic domain effects in DAT.
0898-929X
892-909
Garrard, P.
4815434c-b90e-4998-934b-794c741eea76
Lambon Ralph, M.A.
3e0b212a-7b29-4c1d-bc99-cd64f9edf3d9
Watson, P.C.
cea8956b-ab5d-42df-908a-18b9d15abf75
Patterson, K.
9f16a321-0329-4d02-8c66-8808072110ae
Hodges, J.R.
c17af0a9-82e7-4f5a-8a97-d50ec06bbb0a
Garrard, P.
4815434c-b90e-4998-934b-794c741eea76
Lambon Ralph, M.A.
3e0b212a-7b29-4c1d-bc99-cd64f9edf3d9
Watson, P.C.
cea8956b-ab5d-42df-908a-18b9d15abf75
Patterson, K.
9f16a321-0329-4d02-8c66-8808072110ae
Hodges, J.R.
c17af0a9-82e7-4f5a-8a97-d50ec06bbb0a

Garrard, P., Lambon Ralph, M.A., Watson, P.C., Patterson, K. and Hodges, J.R. (2001) Longitudinal profiles of semantic impairment for living and nonliving concepts in dementia of Alzheimer's type. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 (7), 892-909. (doi:10.1162/089892901753165818).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Two types of theoretical account have been proposed to explain the phenomenon of category-specific impairment in tests of semantic memory: One stresses the importance of different cortical regions to the representation of living and nonliving categories, while the other emphasize the importance of statistical relationships among features of concepts belonging to these two broad semantic domains. Theories of the latter kind predict that the direction of a domain advantage will be determined in large part by the overall damage to the semantic system, and that the profiles of patients with progressive impairments of semantic memory are likely to include a point at which an advantage for one domain changes to an advantage for the other. The present series of three studies employed semantic test data from two separate cohorts of patients with probable dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT) to look for evidence of such a crossover. In the first study, longitudinal test scores from a cohort of 58 patients were examined to confirm the presence of progressive semantic deterioration in this group. In the second study, Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on serial naming responses and plotted separately for items belonging to living and nonliving domains indicated that the representations of living concepts (as measured by naming) deteriorated at a consistently and significantly faster rate than those of nonliving concepts. A third study, carried out to look in detail at the performance of mildly affected patients, employed an additional cross-sectional cohort of 20 patients with mild DAT and utilized a graded naming assessment. This study also revealed no evidence for a crossover in the advantage of one domain over the other as a function of disease severity. Taken together with the model of anatomical progression in DAT based on the work of Braak and Braak (1991), these findings are interpreted as evidence for the importance of regional cerebral anatomy to the genesis of semantic domain effects in DAT.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: March 2001

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 48419
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/48419
ISSN: 0898-929X
PURE UUID: f91aa1f8-6378-47cf-9bb8-38bfb775ef1f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Sep 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P. Garrard
Author: M.A. Lambon Ralph
Author: P.C. Watson
Author: K. Patterson
Author: J.R. Hodges

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×