The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

“增益”还是“损耗”?挑战性工作要求对工作-家庭增益的“双刃剑”影响

“增益”还是“损耗”?挑战性工作要求对工作-家庭增益的“双刃剑”影响
“增益”还是“损耗”?挑战性工作要求对工作-家庭增益的“双刃剑”影响
The balance of work and family has received widespread attention from managers and researchers in recent years. Previous research claims that job demand, as a kind of pressure felt by employees, reduces employees’ work motivation, increases employee fatigue and anxiety, and hinders work-family enrichment. However, different job demands (e.g., challenge demand and hindrance demand) have different effects on employees. Challenge demand, which gives individuals the opportunity to acquire new knowledge and promote personal growth, influences work-family enrichment in a complex way. However, few researches pay sufficient attention to the mechanism of the double-edged effect in the relationship between challenge demand and work-family enrichment. In addition, although scholarly research on job demand and work-family enrichment has increasingly focused on within-person fluctuations in recent years, how to examine the “dynamic” effects of challenge demand on work-family enrichment has received little attention. Therefore, based on conservation of resource theory and uncertainty management theory and from static and dynamic perspectives, we comprehensively examined the effects of challenge demand on work-family enrichment by clarifying the different attributes of challenge demand (daily level model, average level model, daily shift model, and variability model).

We tested our hypothesis by conducting a diary study of 105 participations over 10 working days. Data were collected via a job demand scale, work absorption scale, relaxation scale, and work-family enrichment scale. First, we recorded control variables (gender, marital status, and spouse’s work status) during the weekends. Second, researchers collected daily data (challenge demand, hindrance demand, work absorption, relaxation, and work-family enrichment) from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. each workday. Ultimately, 645 valid data points at the within-person level were available for 81 participants. Using SPSS 24.0, Mplus 7.0, and R software, we conducted a multilevel path analysis to examine the theoretical model.

Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the validity of the key variables (challenge demand, work absorption, relaxation, and work-family enrichment), and the results confirmed that the present study had good discriminant validity. The results of multilevel path analysis showed that the following. (1) In the static model, challenge demand had double-edged sword effects on work-family enrichment at the within-person level (daily level model); in the average level model (between-person level), the average level of challenge demand positively predicted chronic work absorption and negatively predicted chronic relaxation, and the mediating effect of chronic relaxation was stronger than that of chronic work absorption. (2) In the dynamic model, directionality of daily shifts in challenge demand negatively affected daily work absorption and daily relaxation in the daily shift model (within-person level). Only the mediating role of daily relaxation was significant; in the variability model (between-person level), the variability level of challenge demand had a negative impact on chronic work absorption and chronic relaxation, and only the mediating role of chronic relaxation was significant.

The study makes critical contributions both theoretically and practically. (1) The static model indicated that, through the gained and deleted paths, the double-edged sword effect of the relationship between daily challenge demand, average level of change demand, and work-family enrichment was significant. (2) Through the dynamic model, this study explored the negative effect of challenge demand fluctuations on work-family enrichment in two forms, namely, daily shift directionality and the variability of challenge demand. Practically, this study suggests that managers should fully recognize the double-edged sword effect of challenge demand.
0439-755X
1234-1247
Xu, Shan
00a949ba-5cc7-4772-9861-b1701e8f76fd
Zhang, Yucheng
3a7eb0ef-8c03-419f-abdf-4f11f9d097ea
Zhang, Bingran
08e291c2-e7d1-4f00-acdb-53b6cc39793c
Shi, Junqi
540d91ad-9a97-4303-9820-385884f448ab
Yuan, Mengsha
a4927406-29a4-4b9a-8f3e-fc8ed0835c35
Ren, Yingwei
cfa1892b-0cd1-4218-aa70-028bf5595f85
Xu, Shan
00a949ba-5cc7-4772-9861-b1701e8f76fd
Zhang, Yucheng
3a7eb0ef-8c03-419f-abdf-4f11f9d097ea
Zhang, Bingran
08e291c2-e7d1-4f00-acdb-53b6cc39793c
Shi, Junqi
540d91ad-9a97-4303-9820-385884f448ab
Yuan, Mengsha
a4927406-29a4-4b9a-8f3e-fc8ed0835c35
Ren, Yingwei
cfa1892b-0cd1-4218-aa70-028bf5595f85

Xu, Shan, Zhang, Yucheng, Zhang, Bingran, Shi, Junqi, Yuan, Mengsha and Ren, Yingwei (2022) “增益”还是“损耗”?挑战性工作要求对工作-家庭增益的“双刃剑”影响. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54 (10), 1234-1247. (doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.01234).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The balance of work and family has received widespread attention from managers and researchers in recent years. Previous research claims that job demand, as a kind of pressure felt by employees, reduces employees’ work motivation, increases employee fatigue and anxiety, and hinders work-family enrichment. However, different job demands (e.g., challenge demand and hindrance demand) have different effects on employees. Challenge demand, which gives individuals the opportunity to acquire new knowledge and promote personal growth, influences work-family enrichment in a complex way. However, few researches pay sufficient attention to the mechanism of the double-edged effect in the relationship between challenge demand and work-family enrichment. In addition, although scholarly research on job demand and work-family enrichment has increasingly focused on within-person fluctuations in recent years, how to examine the “dynamic” effects of challenge demand on work-family enrichment has received little attention. Therefore, based on conservation of resource theory and uncertainty management theory and from static and dynamic perspectives, we comprehensively examined the effects of challenge demand on work-family enrichment by clarifying the different attributes of challenge demand (daily level model, average level model, daily shift model, and variability model).

We tested our hypothesis by conducting a diary study of 105 participations over 10 working days. Data were collected via a job demand scale, work absorption scale, relaxation scale, and work-family enrichment scale. First, we recorded control variables (gender, marital status, and spouse’s work status) during the weekends. Second, researchers collected daily data (challenge demand, hindrance demand, work absorption, relaxation, and work-family enrichment) from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. each workday. Ultimately, 645 valid data points at the within-person level were available for 81 participants. Using SPSS 24.0, Mplus 7.0, and R software, we conducted a multilevel path analysis to examine the theoretical model.

Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the validity of the key variables (challenge demand, work absorption, relaxation, and work-family enrichment), and the results confirmed that the present study had good discriminant validity. The results of multilevel path analysis showed that the following. (1) In the static model, challenge demand had double-edged sword effects on work-family enrichment at the within-person level (daily level model); in the average level model (between-person level), the average level of challenge demand positively predicted chronic work absorption and negatively predicted chronic relaxation, and the mediating effect of chronic relaxation was stronger than that of chronic work absorption. (2) In the dynamic model, directionality of daily shifts in challenge demand negatively affected daily work absorption and daily relaxation in the daily shift model (within-person level). Only the mediating role of daily relaxation was significant; in the variability model (between-person level), the variability level of challenge demand had a negative impact on chronic work absorption and chronic relaxation, and only the mediating role of chronic relaxation was significant.

The study makes critical contributions both theoretically and practically. (1) The static model indicated that, through the gained and deleted paths, the double-edged sword effect of the relationship between daily challenge demand, average level of change demand, and work-family enrichment was significant. (2) Through the dynamic model, this study explored the negative effect of challenge demand fluctuations on work-family enrichment in two forms, namely, daily shift directionality and the variability of challenge demand. Practically, this study suggests that managers should fully recognize the double-edged sword effect of challenge demand.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 25 October 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 October 2022
Alternative titles: Gain or loss? Examining the double-edged sword effect of challenge demand on work-family enrichment

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 484254
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/484254
ISSN: 0439-755X
PURE UUID: fb4aec54-3bb5-4814-936b-b27e65d04fe1
ORCID for Yucheng Zhang: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9435-6734

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Nov 2023 18:51
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Shan Xu
Author: Yucheng Zhang ORCID iD
Author: Bingran Zhang
Author: Junqi Shi
Author: Mengsha Yuan
Author: Yingwei Ren

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×