The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Alternative cascade-testing protocols for identifying and managing patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia: systematic reviews, qualitative study and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Alternative cascade-testing protocols for identifying and managing patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia: systematic reviews, qualitative study and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Alternative cascade-testing protocols for identifying and managing patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia: systematic reviews, qualitative study and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Background: cascade testing the relatives of people with familial hypercholesterolaemia is an efficient approach to identifying familial hypercholesterolaemia. The cascade-testing protocol starts with identifying an index patient with familial hypercholesterolaemia, followed by one of three approaches to contact other relatives: indirect approach, whereby index patients contact their relatives; direct approach, whereby the specialist contacts the relatives; or a combination of both direct and indirect approaches. However, it is unclear which protocol may be most effective.

Objectives: the objectives were to determine the yield of cases from different cascade-testing protocols, treatment patterns, and short- and long-term outcomes for people with familial hypercholesterolaemia; to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative protocols for familial hypercholesterolaemia cascade testing; and to qualitatively assess the acceptability of different cascade-testing protocols to individuals and families with familial hypercholesterolaemia, and to health-care providers.

Design and methods: this study comprised systematic reviews and analysis of three data sets: PASS (PASS Software, Rijswijk, the Netherlands) hospital familial hypercholesterolaemia databases, the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)–Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) linked primary–secondary care data set, and a specialist familial hypercholesterolaemia register. Cost-effectiveness modelling, incorporating preceding analyses, was undertaken. Acceptability was examined in interviews with patients, relatives and health-care professionals.

Result: systematic review of protocols: based on data from 4 of the 24 studies, the combined approach led to a slightly higher yield of relatives tested [40%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 37% to 42%] than the direct (33%, 95% CI 28% to 39%) or indirect approaches alone (34%, 95% CI 30% to 37%). The PASS databases identified that those contacted directly were more likely to complete cascade testing (p < 0.01); the CPRD–HES data set indicated that 70% did not achieve target treatment levels, and demonstrated increased cardiovascular disease risk among these individuals, compared with controls (hazard ratio 9.14, 95% CI 8.55 to 9.76). The specialist familial hypercholesterolaemia register confirmed excessive cardiovascular morbidity (standardised morbidity ratio 7.17, 95% CI 6.79 to 7.56). Cost-effectiveness modelling found a net health gain from diagnosis of –0.27 to 2.51 quality-adjusted life-years at the willingness-to-pay threshold of £15,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. The cost-effective protocols cascaded from genetically confirmed index cases by contacting first- and second-degree relatives simultaneously and directly. Interviews found a service-led direct-contact approach was more reliable, but combining direct and indirect approaches, guided by index patients and family relationships, may be more acceptable.

Limitations: systematic reviews were not used in the economic analysis, as relevant studies were lacking or of poor quality. As only a proportion of those with primary care-coded familial hypercholesterolaemia are likely to actually have familial hypercholesterolaemia, CPRD analyses are likely to underestimate the true effect. The cost-effectiveness analysis required assumptions related to the long-term cardiovascular disease risk, the effect of treatment on cholesterol and the generalisability of estimates from the data sets. Interview recruitment was limited to white English-speaking participants.

Conclusions: based on limited evidence, most cost-effective cascade-testing protocols, diagnosing most relatives, select index cases by genetic testing, with services directly contacting relatives, and contacting second-degree relatives even if first-degree relatives have not been tested. Combined approaches to contact relatives may be more suitable for some families.

Future work: establish a long-term familial hypercholesterolaemia cohort, measuring cholesterol levels, treatment and cardiovascular outcomes. Conduct a randomised study comparing different approaches to contact relatives.

Study registration: this study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018117445 and CRD42019125775.

Funding: this project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 16. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Humans, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/diagnosis, Systematic Reviews as Topic
1366-5278
1-140
Qureshi, Nadeem
d8b40881-778d-4d7d-b39a-04abc11b71ab
Woods, Bethan
117c43b6-23ea-4a59-8b45-6a23eec05a9f
de Faria, Rita Neves
797ab61e-6899-4688-a7ec-2b46531c35bf
Saramago Goncalves, Pedro
357d392a-a4bb-4c51-ad81-0bf455f40b4e
Cox, Edward
ddcadcd5-6667-42ab-bab5-4abc5056785f
Leonardi Bee, Jo
746173bf-9dc1-456d-81b0-50e11a299dd8
Condon, Laura
52161c7e-85a8-416f-98e3-08a4edf642b8
Weng, Stephen
9d90d74c-43a3-4050-93ab-9843bf1d95da
Akyea, Ralph K.
e65a6890-0e13-412f-bdc3-d0618d755274
Iyen, Barbara
eece1033-b6f3-4936-88de-0d5330e17f0d
Roderick, Paul
e5ecc991-931d-44ae-9cb3-02f644f61e63
Humphries, Steve E.
00daa3dd-2447-4e61-b130-f8bc97ca1b78
Rowlands, William
02db4503-548c-4f2b-942e-0cbc1be63e26
Watson, Melanie
4edd70e6-1e41-4ad9-8eca-1caefbef9e6a
Haralambos, Kate
a7634ff0-4c63-4c1f-86b1-ba0a0b2a1c63
Kenny, Ryan
65e35c09-54e4-4789-a8f8-1c2b1cebcbd7
Datta, Dev
81ad3257-82f8-4027-9211-ee891942658a
Miedzybrodzka, Zosia
710274ea-d819-4853-995d-709e844a866c
Byrne, Christopher
1370b997-cead-4229-83a7-53301ed2a43c
Kai, Joe
4149b8ab-84df-46e1-8735-4599809387e9
Qureshi, Nadeem
d8b40881-778d-4d7d-b39a-04abc11b71ab
Woods, Bethan
117c43b6-23ea-4a59-8b45-6a23eec05a9f
de Faria, Rita Neves
797ab61e-6899-4688-a7ec-2b46531c35bf
Saramago Goncalves, Pedro
357d392a-a4bb-4c51-ad81-0bf455f40b4e
Cox, Edward
ddcadcd5-6667-42ab-bab5-4abc5056785f
Leonardi Bee, Jo
746173bf-9dc1-456d-81b0-50e11a299dd8
Condon, Laura
52161c7e-85a8-416f-98e3-08a4edf642b8
Weng, Stephen
9d90d74c-43a3-4050-93ab-9843bf1d95da
Akyea, Ralph K.
e65a6890-0e13-412f-bdc3-d0618d755274
Iyen, Barbara
eece1033-b6f3-4936-88de-0d5330e17f0d
Roderick, Paul
e5ecc991-931d-44ae-9cb3-02f644f61e63
Humphries, Steve E.
00daa3dd-2447-4e61-b130-f8bc97ca1b78
Rowlands, William
02db4503-548c-4f2b-942e-0cbc1be63e26
Watson, Melanie
4edd70e6-1e41-4ad9-8eca-1caefbef9e6a
Haralambos, Kate
a7634ff0-4c63-4c1f-86b1-ba0a0b2a1c63
Kenny, Ryan
65e35c09-54e4-4789-a8f8-1c2b1cebcbd7
Datta, Dev
81ad3257-82f8-4027-9211-ee891942658a
Miedzybrodzka, Zosia
710274ea-d819-4853-995d-709e844a866c
Byrne, Christopher
1370b997-cead-4229-83a7-53301ed2a43c
Kai, Joe
4149b8ab-84df-46e1-8735-4599809387e9

Qureshi, Nadeem, Woods, Bethan, de Faria, Rita Neves, Saramago Goncalves, Pedro, Cox, Edward, Leonardi Bee, Jo, Condon, Laura, Weng, Stephen, Akyea, Ralph K., Iyen, Barbara, Roderick, Paul, Humphries, Steve E., Rowlands, William, Watson, Melanie, Haralambos, Kate, Kenny, Ryan, Datta, Dev, Miedzybrodzka, Zosia, Byrne, Christopher and Kai, Joe (2023) Alternative cascade-testing protocols for identifying and managing patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia: systematic reviews, qualitative study and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technology Assessment, 27 (16), 1-140. (doi:10.3310/CTMD0148).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: cascade testing the relatives of people with familial hypercholesterolaemia is an efficient approach to identifying familial hypercholesterolaemia. The cascade-testing protocol starts with identifying an index patient with familial hypercholesterolaemia, followed by one of three approaches to contact other relatives: indirect approach, whereby index patients contact their relatives; direct approach, whereby the specialist contacts the relatives; or a combination of both direct and indirect approaches. However, it is unclear which protocol may be most effective.

Objectives: the objectives were to determine the yield of cases from different cascade-testing protocols, treatment patterns, and short- and long-term outcomes for people with familial hypercholesterolaemia; to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative protocols for familial hypercholesterolaemia cascade testing; and to qualitatively assess the acceptability of different cascade-testing protocols to individuals and families with familial hypercholesterolaemia, and to health-care providers.

Design and methods: this study comprised systematic reviews and analysis of three data sets: PASS (PASS Software, Rijswijk, the Netherlands) hospital familial hypercholesterolaemia databases, the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)–Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) linked primary–secondary care data set, and a specialist familial hypercholesterolaemia register. Cost-effectiveness modelling, incorporating preceding analyses, was undertaken. Acceptability was examined in interviews with patients, relatives and health-care professionals.

Result: systematic review of protocols: based on data from 4 of the 24 studies, the combined approach led to a slightly higher yield of relatives tested [40%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 37% to 42%] than the direct (33%, 95% CI 28% to 39%) or indirect approaches alone (34%, 95% CI 30% to 37%). The PASS databases identified that those contacted directly were more likely to complete cascade testing (p < 0.01); the CPRD–HES data set indicated that 70% did not achieve target treatment levels, and demonstrated increased cardiovascular disease risk among these individuals, compared with controls (hazard ratio 9.14, 95% CI 8.55 to 9.76). The specialist familial hypercholesterolaemia register confirmed excessive cardiovascular morbidity (standardised morbidity ratio 7.17, 95% CI 6.79 to 7.56). Cost-effectiveness modelling found a net health gain from diagnosis of –0.27 to 2.51 quality-adjusted life-years at the willingness-to-pay threshold of £15,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. The cost-effective protocols cascaded from genetically confirmed index cases by contacting first- and second-degree relatives simultaneously and directly. Interviews found a service-led direct-contact approach was more reliable, but combining direct and indirect approaches, guided by index patients and family relationships, may be more acceptable.

Limitations: systematic reviews were not used in the economic analysis, as relevant studies were lacking or of poor quality. As only a proportion of those with primary care-coded familial hypercholesterolaemia are likely to actually have familial hypercholesterolaemia, CPRD analyses are likely to underestimate the true effect. The cost-effectiveness analysis required assumptions related to the long-term cardiovascular disease risk, the effect of treatment on cholesterol and the generalisability of estimates from the data sets. Interview recruitment was limited to white English-speaking participants.

Conclusions: based on limited evidence, most cost-effective cascade-testing protocols, diagnosing most relatives, select index cases by genetic testing, with services directly contacting relatives, and contacting second-degree relatives even if first-degree relatives have not been tested. Combined approaches to contact relatives may be more suitable for some families.

Future work: establish a long-term familial hypercholesterolaemia cohort, measuring cholesterol levels, treatment and cardiovascular outcomes. Conduct a randomised study comparing different approaches to contact relatives.

Study registration: this study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018117445 and CRD42019125775.

Funding: this project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 16. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Text
Cascade-testing protocols for FH_NIHR Journals Library - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (3MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 October 2023
Published date: 1 October 2023
Keywords: Humans, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/diagnosis, Systematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 484391
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/484391
ISSN: 1366-5278
PURE UUID: b425bead-3780-4c0a-b9c7-57398e5e3aac
ORCID for Christopher Byrne: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6322-7753

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Nov 2023 11:45
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:50

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nadeem Qureshi
Author: Bethan Woods
Author: Rita Neves de Faria
Author: Pedro Saramago Goncalves
Author: Edward Cox
Author: Jo Leonardi Bee
Author: Laura Condon
Author: Stephen Weng
Author: Ralph K. Akyea
Author: Barbara Iyen
Author: Paul Roderick
Author: Steve E. Humphries
Author: William Rowlands
Author: Melanie Watson
Author: Kate Haralambos
Author: Ryan Kenny
Author: Dev Datta
Author: Zosia Miedzybrodzka
Author: Joe Kai

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×