The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Parental decisional satisfaction after hypospadias repair in the United Kingdom

Parental decisional satisfaction after hypospadias repair in the United Kingdom
Parental decisional satisfaction after hypospadias repair in the United Kingdom

Background: in hypospadias, the aim of surgical treatment is to achieve both desirable functional and cosmetic outcomes; however, complications following surgery are common and 18% of boys require re-operation. In mild degrees of hypospadias, repair may be offered entirely to improve cosmesis, meaning parents should be fully informed of this and the potential for complications, during the consent process. Parents’ decision-making may be aided by making them aware of how others in a similar position have felt about the decision that they made for their child. One method of measuring parental satisfaction is decisional regret (DR). 

Objectives: to assess parental satisfaction following hypospadias surgery in the United Kingdom by assessing DR and to determine the feasibility of obtaining meaningful data via a mobile phone survey. 

Study design: the National Outcomes Audit in Hypospadias database was commissioned by the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons to capture clinical information from hypospadias repairs. Following ethical approval (16/NW/0819), a text message was sent to mobile numbers in the database inviting participation in a questionnaire incorporating the validated DR scale (DRS). The primary outcome measure was mean DRS score, which was correlated with clinical information, a score of zero indicated no regret and 100 indicated maximum regret. 

Results: there were 340 (37%) responses. The median age at the primary procedure was 16 (interquartile range 13–20) months. No DR (score = 0) was detected in 186 (55% [95%CI 49–60]) respondents; however, moderate-to-severe DR (score = 26–100) was seen in 21 (6.2% [95%CI 3.6–8.7]) respondents. On multivariate analysis, a distal meatus, a small glans and developing complications requiring repeat surgery were all associated with increased levels of regret (Table). There was no association between DR and cases performed per surgeon.

 Discussion: around half of respondents demonstrated no DR and postoperative complications requiring surgery were associated with the highest levels of DR, which is similar to a Canadian study. Lorenzo et al. however found that DR was associated with circumcision, which was undertaken in all boys; however, in this UK study, around a third of boys were circumcised and regret levels between those circumcised and those not circumcised were similar. The limitations of this work include the following: surgeons submitting their own data on complications and there is potential of selection bias between respondents and non-respondents as with any survey. 

Conclusions: data from this study can be used to improve pre-operative counselling during the consent process. Smart mobile phone technology can be used successfully to distribute and collect parent-reported outcomes. [Table presented]

Decision-making, Hypospadias, Informed consent, Reconstructive surgical procedures, Surveys and questionnaires
1477-5131
164.e1-164.e7
Bethell, G.S.
c7a62cc1-5573-41f6-ae00-3c11e8219dd4
Chhabra, S.
bc435a1f-e965-48be-8331-8e35daace404
Shalaby, M.S.
506a76b7-fd73-4fcd-89d2-58da312556d0
Corbett, H.
eebbc3a7-c4ea-4415-9e29-571fd3fb9e44
Kenny, S.E.
9e0d8c3f-44d3-45db-9329-c70650d7d67e
Godse, Alok
7a2dcd88-4d3f-4cfa-83e5-2bcb9b3b8f6e
Lall, Anupam
19b56972-2e64-4b59-932b-512e547e2c90
Taghizadeh, Arash
7b397a4d-3272-4aa9-8048-1bc1077f9051
Lee, Boma
1ef3a9e2-2823-444b-a59f-89fd0d98a374
Driver, Chris
4ea225db-3c32-43b3-b41d-76f2bd29af42
Keene, David
ad9a996f-240b-499f-834d-847e727b1abc
Marshall, David
14138fc7-4c28-4e85-8b27-ad7dcf5a1db5
Murphy, Feilim
faed8c57-4520-4781-beb5-a7dd2a0f78e7
McAndrew, Fiona
989ec1f8-684b-43f1-a553-b4e303185073
Nicholls, Guy
4f3895f3-9bdd-4bf8-971a-d0abebada66d
Chandran, Harish
75a420f5-dfad-436f-8999-90df4882d099
Steinbrecher, Henrik
1d1f9c74-d8c1-43f9-99ec-039beba21f9c
Evans, Kathryn
9ffe237d-b8d7-4f65-9246-d3f2400b0bf5
McCarthy, Liam
025f5c9f-16a3-4e5a-ab9e-763e57b28fda
Steven, Mairi
a6e5fe17-c77f-409e-9948-64161dce3ff9
Shenoy, Manoj
492284d2-d69c-4934-96b8-8032382ebafb
Farrugia, Marie Klaire
97b4bf3c-23d4-4640-8a48-970f4c99ebfd
Woodward, Mark
97f9be2a-f89a-4d55-8d6d-2c974e181366
Flett, Martyn
b1bc84e8-b947-458d-a61b-45e22b24560d
Gopal, Milan
a9e46d85-dfee-44af-8a37-753ce587eb85
Godbole, Prasad
1403dcff-e471-43f7-97d5-286135a62fb5
Daniel, Rejoo
fa6233c4-26c3-4f16-9191-bfedfb155da0
Romero, Rosa M.
646a308a-3414-4bd8-bb14-c7e7983d8328
Wragg, Ruth
9c1a3ff0-6cb9-44ff-afe5-8c1a531ce165
Manoharan, Sengamalai
dd032b1a-7af2-439b-9304-e6d0aa45c429
Griffin, Stephen
49c409b7-ee50-4809-b6b8-d5e192ff7424
O'Toole, Stuart
e06ccf85-5b34-4f88-83eb-5ad47010b312
Abbas, Tariq
f9142ad3-6da3-4662-85b0-991a19c4cd9a
Kalidasan, Varadarajan
294019de-c9eb-4909-b053-9f618a4f3012
BAPS NOAH Contributors
Bethell, G.S.
c7a62cc1-5573-41f6-ae00-3c11e8219dd4
Chhabra, S.
bc435a1f-e965-48be-8331-8e35daace404
Shalaby, M.S.
506a76b7-fd73-4fcd-89d2-58da312556d0
Corbett, H.
eebbc3a7-c4ea-4415-9e29-571fd3fb9e44
Kenny, S.E.
9e0d8c3f-44d3-45db-9329-c70650d7d67e
Godse, Alok
7a2dcd88-4d3f-4cfa-83e5-2bcb9b3b8f6e
Lall, Anupam
19b56972-2e64-4b59-932b-512e547e2c90
Taghizadeh, Arash
7b397a4d-3272-4aa9-8048-1bc1077f9051
Lee, Boma
1ef3a9e2-2823-444b-a59f-89fd0d98a374
Driver, Chris
4ea225db-3c32-43b3-b41d-76f2bd29af42
Keene, David
ad9a996f-240b-499f-834d-847e727b1abc
Marshall, David
14138fc7-4c28-4e85-8b27-ad7dcf5a1db5
Murphy, Feilim
faed8c57-4520-4781-beb5-a7dd2a0f78e7
McAndrew, Fiona
989ec1f8-684b-43f1-a553-b4e303185073
Nicholls, Guy
4f3895f3-9bdd-4bf8-971a-d0abebada66d
Chandran, Harish
75a420f5-dfad-436f-8999-90df4882d099
Steinbrecher, Henrik
1d1f9c74-d8c1-43f9-99ec-039beba21f9c
Evans, Kathryn
9ffe237d-b8d7-4f65-9246-d3f2400b0bf5
McCarthy, Liam
025f5c9f-16a3-4e5a-ab9e-763e57b28fda
Steven, Mairi
a6e5fe17-c77f-409e-9948-64161dce3ff9
Shenoy, Manoj
492284d2-d69c-4934-96b8-8032382ebafb
Farrugia, Marie Klaire
97b4bf3c-23d4-4640-8a48-970f4c99ebfd
Woodward, Mark
97f9be2a-f89a-4d55-8d6d-2c974e181366
Flett, Martyn
b1bc84e8-b947-458d-a61b-45e22b24560d
Gopal, Milan
a9e46d85-dfee-44af-8a37-753ce587eb85
Godbole, Prasad
1403dcff-e471-43f7-97d5-286135a62fb5
Daniel, Rejoo
fa6233c4-26c3-4f16-9191-bfedfb155da0
Romero, Rosa M.
646a308a-3414-4bd8-bb14-c7e7983d8328
Wragg, Ruth
9c1a3ff0-6cb9-44ff-afe5-8c1a531ce165
Manoharan, Sengamalai
dd032b1a-7af2-439b-9304-e6d0aa45c429
Griffin, Stephen
49c409b7-ee50-4809-b6b8-d5e192ff7424
O'Toole, Stuart
e06ccf85-5b34-4f88-83eb-5ad47010b312
Abbas, Tariq
f9142ad3-6da3-4662-85b0-991a19c4cd9a
Kalidasan, Varadarajan
294019de-c9eb-4909-b053-9f618a4f3012

Bethell, G.S., Chhabra, S., Shalaby, M.S., Corbett, H. and Kenny, S.E. , BAPS NOAH Contributors (2020) Parental decisional satisfaction after hypospadias repair in the United Kingdom. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 16 (2), 164.e1-164.e7. (doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.01.005).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: in hypospadias, the aim of surgical treatment is to achieve both desirable functional and cosmetic outcomes; however, complications following surgery are common and 18% of boys require re-operation. In mild degrees of hypospadias, repair may be offered entirely to improve cosmesis, meaning parents should be fully informed of this and the potential for complications, during the consent process. Parents’ decision-making may be aided by making them aware of how others in a similar position have felt about the decision that they made for their child. One method of measuring parental satisfaction is decisional regret (DR). 

Objectives: to assess parental satisfaction following hypospadias surgery in the United Kingdom by assessing DR and to determine the feasibility of obtaining meaningful data via a mobile phone survey. 

Study design: the National Outcomes Audit in Hypospadias database was commissioned by the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons to capture clinical information from hypospadias repairs. Following ethical approval (16/NW/0819), a text message was sent to mobile numbers in the database inviting participation in a questionnaire incorporating the validated DR scale (DRS). The primary outcome measure was mean DRS score, which was correlated with clinical information, a score of zero indicated no regret and 100 indicated maximum regret. 

Results: there were 340 (37%) responses. The median age at the primary procedure was 16 (interquartile range 13–20) months. No DR (score = 0) was detected in 186 (55% [95%CI 49–60]) respondents; however, moderate-to-severe DR (score = 26–100) was seen in 21 (6.2% [95%CI 3.6–8.7]) respondents. On multivariate analysis, a distal meatus, a small glans and developing complications requiring repeat surgery were all associated with increased levels of regret (Table). There was no association between DR and cases performed per surgeon.

 Discussion: around half of respondents demonstrated no DR and postoperative complications requiring surgery were associated with the highest levels of DR, which is similar to a Canadian study. Lorenzo et al. however found that DR was associated with circumcision, which was undertaken in all boys; however, in this UK study, around a third of boys were circumcised and regret levels between those circumcised and those not circumcised were similar. The limitations of this work include the following: surgeons submitting their own data on complications and there is potential of selection bias between respondents and non-respondents as with any survey. 

Conclusions: data from this study can be used to improve pre-operative counselling during the consent process. Smart mobile phone technology can be used successfully to distribute and collect parent-reported outcomes. [Table presented]

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 January 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 June 2020
Published date: 1 June 2020
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company
Keywords: Decision-making, Hypospadias, Informed consent, Reconstructive surgical procedures, Surveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 484841
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/484841
ISSN: 1477-5131
PURE UUID: d02c830e-9eb0-4935-a786-5cb5ee2c5698
ORCID for G.S. Bethell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1302-0735

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Nov 2023 17:57
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: G.S. Bethell ORCID iD
Author: S. Chhabra
Author: M.S. Shalaby
Author: H. Corbett
Author: S.E. Kenny
Author: Alok Godse
Author: Anupam Lall
Author: Arash Taghizadeh
Author: Boma Lee
Author: Chris Driver
Author: David Keene
Author: David Marshall
Author: Feilim Murphy
Author: Fiona McAndrew
Author: Guy Nicholls
Author: Harish Chandran
Author: Henrik Steinbrecher
Author: Kathryn Evans
Author: Liam McCarthy
Author: Mairi Steven
Author: Manoj Shenoy
Author: Marie Klaire Farrugia
Author: Mark Woodward
Author: Martyn Flett
Author: Milan Gopal
Author: Prasad Godbole
Author: Rejoo Daniel
Author: Rosa M. Romero
Author: Ruth Wragg
Author: Sengamalai Manoharan
Author: Stephen Griffin
Author: Stuart O'Toole
Author: Tariq Abbas
Author: Varadarajan Kalidasan
Corporate Author: BAPS NOAH Contributors

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×