Monetary policy inertia and the paradox of flexibility
Monetary policy inertia and the paradox of flexibility
This paper revisits the paradox of flexibility, i.e., the result that, in a liquidity trap, greater price flexibility amplifies output volatility in response to negative demand shocks. We argue this paradox is the consequence of a failure of standard models to correctly characterise monetary policy at the zero lower bound. We show that allowing for a smooth adjustment of the shadow policy rate eliminates the paradox and produces output responses to a negative demand shock that are in line with those under optimal monetary policy. The reason is that, under an inertial policy, a decline in the shadow rate implies that the future actual policy rate will remain relatively low, which increases expectations about the economic outlook and inflation. The rise in inflation expectations reduces the real rate, thereby sustaining real activity. As we raise the degree of price flexibility, a negative demand shock causes a sharper fall in the shadow rate and increase in inflation expectations, which leads to a more significant drop in the real rate and, hence, a milder decline in the output gap.
Interest rate smoothing, Liquidity trap, Paradox of flexibility, Zero lower bound
Bonciani, Dario
a2b065a5-415c-4554-8d3a-4087e80b7598
Oh, Joonseok
020d4770-4b18-4b76-bf81-d3e58b9f4eed
23 May 2023
Bonciani, Dario
a2b065a5-415c-4554-8d3a-4087e80b7598
Oh, Joonseok
020d4770-4b18-4b76-bf81-d3e58b9f4eed
Bonciani, Dario and Oh, Joonseok
(2023)
Monetary policy inertia and the paradox of flexibility.
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 151, [104668].
(doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2023.104668).
Abstract
This paper revisits the paradox of flexibility, i.e., the result that, in a liquidity trap, greater price flexibility amplifies output volatility in response to negative demand shocks. We argue this paradox is the consequence of a failure of standard models to correctly characterise monetary policy at the zero lower bound. We show that allowing for a smooth adjustment of the shadow policy rate eliminates the paradox and produces output responses to a negative demand shock that are in line with those under optimal monetary policy. The reason is that, under an inertial policy, a decline in the shadow rate implies that the future actual policy rate will remain relatively low, which increases expectations about the economic outlook and inflation. The rise in inflation expectations reduces the real rate, thereby sustaining real activity. As we raise the degree of price flexibility, a negative demand shock causes a sharper fall in the shadow rate and increase in inflation expectations, which leads to a more significant drop in the real rate and, hence, a milder decline in the output gap.
Text
Accepted manuscript
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 4 May 2025.
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2 May 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 May 2023
Published date: 23 May 2023
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
We are grateful to John Barrdear, Cristiano Cantore, Federico Di Pace, Alexander Haas, Byeong-hyeon Jeong, Mira Kim, Lien Laureys, Eunseong Ma, Riccardo Masolo, Taisuke Nakata, Yeonu Oh, Evi Pappa, Marco Pinchetti, Alberto Polo, Kate Reinold, Ricardo Reis, Martino Ricci, Anna Rogantini Picco, Fergal Shortall, Mathias Trabandt, and Lutz Weinke for insightful discussions and helpful suggestions. All errors are our own.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Bank of England
Keywords:
Interest rate smoothing, Liquidity trap, Paradox of flexibility, Zero lower bound
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 484888
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/484888
ISSN: 0165-1889
PURE UUID: 0f3b3e71-b993-4781-bd50-3ccd5bb30e0f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 Nov 2023 18:28
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:00
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Dario Bonciani
Author:
Joonseok Oh
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics