Exploring police perspectives on algorithmic transparency: a qualitative analysis of police interviews in the UK
Exploring police perspectives on algorithmic transparency: a qualitative analysis of police interviews in the UK
The UK Government’s ‘Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard’ is intended to provide a standardised way for public bodies and government departments to provide information about how algorithmic tools are being used. To explore the implications of police use of the Standard, we conducted semi-structured interviews with respondents from across UK policing and commercial bodies involved in policing technologies. Our aim was to identify rewards, risks, challenges for the police, and areas where the Standard could be improved. We find that algorithmic transparency is both achievable for policing, and could bring significant rewards. If the Standard became an integral part of an effort to drive reflective practice across the development and deployment of algorithmic technology, it could help police forces to learn from each other, facilitate good policy choices around technology, and decrease wasted costs. However, participants reported notable concerns, including misperception of the dangers of policing technology, and a worry that the Standard will become an administrative burden rather than a benefit for policing or the public. For successful incorporation, we highlight the need to 1) clearly define what is covered by the Standard, 2) provide suitable exemptions for sensitive contexts and tradecraft, 3) ensure that forces have the resources and ability to comply with the Standard, and 4) address supplier responsibilities regarding transparency in procurement contracts. We suggest that future evaluation of the Standard is needed to investigate: a) whether the Transparency Reports created using the Standard meet the needs of intended users, including impacted individuals, advocacy groups, researchers, and legal and policy advisers, b) whether the Standard contributes to an improvement in the quality of policing technology, and c) whether the Standard enables the assessment of the lawfulness of technology used by the police.
Association for Computing Machinery
Zilka, Miri
fc2dcf77-c2de-44f6-bfb8-a4a086692e64
Ashurst, Carolyn
08f1f43e-04d6-4359-a57c-dd4b18b94358
Chambers, Luke
ba439499-d6d9-4f84-8572-eef593072819
Goodman, Ellen P.
00c68b37-672f-4b74-9102-0d9514576b83
Ugwudike, Pamela
2faf9318-093b-4396-9ba1-2291c8991bac
Oswald, Marion
31de78c5-755f-4dea-94c7-fa9861115a82
30 October 2023
Zilka, Miri
fc2dcf77-c2de-44f6-bfb8-a4a086692e64
Ashurst, Carolyn
08f1f43e-04d6-4359-a57c-dd4b18b94358
Chambers, Luke
ba439499-d6d9-4f84-8572-eef593072819
Goodman, Ellen P.
00c68b37-672f-4b74-9102-0d9514576b83
Ugwudike, Pamela
2faf9318-093b-4396-9ba1-2291c8991bac
Oswald, Marion
31de78c5-755f-4dea-94c7-fa9861115a82
Zilka, Miri, Ashurst, Carolyn, Chambers, Luke, Goodman, Ellen P., Ugwudike, Pamela and Oswald, Marion
(2023)
Exploring police perspectives on algorithmic transparency: a qualitative analysis of police interviews in the UK.
In EAAMO '23: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization.
Association for Computing Machinery.
19 pp
.
(doi:10.1145/3617694.3623246).
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
The UK Government’s ‘Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard’ is intended to provide a standardised way for public bodies and government departments to provide information about how algorithmic tools are being used. To explore the implications of police use of the Standard, we conducted semi-structured interviews with respondents from across UK policing and commercial bodies involved in policing technologies. Our aim was to identify rewards, risks, challenges for the police, and areas where the Standard could be improved. We find that algorithmic transparency is both achievable for policing, and could bring significant rewards. If the Standard became an integral part of an effort to drive reflective practice across the development and deployment of algorithmic technology, it could help police forces to learn from each other, facilitate good policy choices around technology, and decrease wasted costs. However, participants reported notable concerns, including misperception of the dangers of policing technology, and a worry that the Standard will become an administrative burden rather than a benefit for policing or the public. For successful incorporation, we highlight the need to 1) clearly define what is covered by the Standard, 2) provide suitable exemptions for sensitive contexts and tradecraft, 3) ensure that forces have the resources and ability to comply with the Standard, and 4) address supplier responsibilities regarding transparency in procurement contracts. We suggest that future evaluation of the Standard is needed to investigate: a) whether the Transparency Reports created using the Standard meet the needs of intended users, including impacted individuals, advocacy groups, researchers, and legal and policy advisers, b) whether the Standard contributes to an improvement in the quality of policing technology, and c) whether the Standard enables the assessment of the lawfulness of technology used by the police.
Text
3617694.3623246
- Version of Record
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 October 2023
Published date: 30 October 2023
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Owner/Author.
Venue - Dates:
ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization, Boston University, Boston, United States, 2023-10-30 - 2023-11-01
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 484907
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/484907
PURE UUID: 36dd8b4b-923b-4fc4-8a3c-b57da9dad26b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Nov 2023 17:35
Last modified: 18 Apr 2024 01:51
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Miri Zilka
Author:
Carolyn Ashurst
Author:
Luke Chambers
Author:
Ellen P. Goodman
Author:
Marion Oswald
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics