The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Gastric residual volume measurement in British neonatal intensive care units: a survey of practice

Gastric residual volume measurement in British neonatal intensive care units: a survey of practice
Gastric residual volume measurement in British neonatal intensive care units: a survey of practice

Objective: despite little evidence, the practice of routine gastric residual volume (GRV) measurement to guide enteral feeding in neonatal units is widespread. Due to increased interest in this practice, and to examine trial feasibility, we aimed to determine enteral feeding and GRV measurement practices in British neonatal units. 

Design and setting: an online survey was distributed via email to all neonatal units and networks in England, Scotland and Wales. A clinical nurse, senior doctor and dietitian were invited to collaboratively complete the survey and submit a copy of relevant guidelines. 

Results: 95/184 (51.6%) approached units completed the survey, 81/95 (85.3%) reported having feeding guidelines and 28 guidelines were submitted for review. The majority of units used intermittent (90/95) gastric feeds as their primary feeding method. 42/95 units reported specific guidance for measuring and interpreting GRV. 20/90 units measured GRV before every feed, 39/90 at regular time intervals (most commonly four to six hourly 35/39) and 26/90 when felt to be clinically indicated. Most units reported uncertainty on the utility of aspirate volume for guiding feeding decisions; 13/90 reported that aspirate volume affected decisions 'very much'. In contrast, aspirate colour was reported to affect decisions 'very much' by 37/90 of responding units. Almost half, 44/90, routinely returned aspirates to the stomach. 

Conclusions: routine GRV measurement is part of standard practice in British neonatal units, although there was inconsistency in how frequently to measure or how to interpret the aspirate. Volume was considered less important than colour of the aspirate.

gastroenterology, measurement, neonatology
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Tume, Lyvonne
7542175e-6747-424b-928c-6232d2596c97
Arch, Barbara
dc409ddd-06f1-48bb-a940-cfe16be2eddc
Woolfall, Kerry
9926fc50-b003-4c93-966c-52618685cb84
Latten, Lynne
6ca915c1-d8f6-401d-a332-8cd725dbff99
Roper, Louise
726095f3-7fbd-4509-8c96-2f4138e31262
Deja, Elizabeth
4226f22d-99c4-4a35-a731-de8ac60b7221
Pathan, Nazima
4d1ef72a-afc0-4082-b6e0-41fb84c64154
Eccleson, Helen
84d4db8b-df6c-44b0-8060-8f76f4a0ce5b
Hickey, Helen
af0641d7-b523-40e3-8e45-578f5f5b1a74
Brown, Michaela
44f04120-93d7-41f1-903c-0a81ffcea852
Beissel, Anne
69d66108-6aa4-4f44-be9a-b7fd93da671d
Andrzejewska, Izabela
1204af6d-67b6-4ddd-ad9c-cb2eeffce178
Valla, Frederic
502abf1b-b9e9-45d0-b994-b1e7e3e39ba3
Gale, Chris
210b7c81-9a39-460a-9ab3-54fe92a69f8e
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Tume, Lyvonne
7542175e-6747-424b-928c-6232d2596c97
Arch, Barbara
dc409ddd-06f1-48bb-a940-cfe16be2eddc
Woolfall, Kerry
9926fc50-b003-4c93-966c-52618685cb84
Latten, Lynne
6ca915c1-d8f6-401d-a332-8cd725dbff99
Roper, Louise
726095f3-7fbd-4509-8c96-2f4138e31262
Deja, Elizabeth
4226f22d-99c4-4a35-a731-de8ac60b7221
Pathan, Nazima
4d1ef72a-afc0-4082-b6e0-41fb84c64154
Eccleson, Helen
84d4db8b-df6c-44b0-8060-8f76f4a0ce5b
Hickey, Helen
af0641d7-b523-40e3-8e45-578f5f5b1a74
Brown, Michaela
44f04120-93d7-41f1-903c-0a81ffcea852
Beissel, Anne
69d66108-6aa4-4f44-be9a-b7fd93da671d
Andrzejewska, Izabela
1204af6d-67b6-4ddd-ad9c-cb2eeffce178
Valla, Frederic
502abf1b-b9e9-45d0-b994-b1e7e3e39ba3
Gale, Chris
210b7c81-9a39-460a-9ab3-54fe92a69f8e

Dorling, Jon, Tume, Lyvonne, Arch, Barbara, Woolfall, Kerry, Latten, Lynne, Roper, Louise, Deja, Elizabeth, Pathan, Nazima, Eccleson, Helen, Hickey, Helen, Brown, Michaela, Beissel, Anne, Andrzejewska, Izabela, Valla, Frederic and Gale, Chris (2020) Gastric residual volume measurement in British neonatal intensive care units: a survey of practice. BMJ Paediatrics Open, 4 (1), [e000601]. (doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000601).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: despite little evidence, the practice of routine gastric residual volume (GRV) measurement to guide enteral feeding in neonatal units is widespread. Due to increased interest in this practice, and to examine trial feasibility, we aimed to determine enteral feeding and GRV measurement practices in British neonatal units. 

Design and setting: an online survey was distributed via email to all neonatal units and networks in England, Scotland and Wales. A clinical nurse, senior doctor and dietitian were invited to collaboratively complete the survey and submit a copy of relevant guidelines. 

Results: 95/184 (51.6%) approached units completed the survey, 81/95 (85.3%) reported having feeding guidelines and 28 guidelines were submitted for review. The majority of units used intermittent (90/95) gastric feeds as their primary feeding method. 42/95 units reported specific guidance for measuring and interpreting GRV. 20/90 units measured GRV before every feed, 39/90 at regular time intervals (most commonly four to six hourly 35/39) and 26/90 when felt to be clinically indicated. Most units reported uncertainty on the utility of aspirate volume for guiding feeding decisions; 13/90 reported that aspirate volume affected decisions 'very much'. In contrast, aspirate colour was reported to affect decisions 'very much' by 37/90 of responding units. Almost half, 44/90, routinely returned aspirates to the stomach. 

Conclusions: routine GRV measurement is part of standard practice in British neonatal units, although there was inconsistency in how frequently to measure or how to interpret the aspirate. Volume was considered less important than colour of the aspirate.

Text
e000601.full - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (359kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 June 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 August 2020
Additional Information: Funding Information: Competing interests JD reports grants from National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), during the conduct of the study; grants from NIHR, grants from Nutrinia, outside the submitted work. LT reports grant from NIHR, during the conduct of the study. ED reports grants from NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme during the conduct of the study. HE reports grants from NIHR HTA during the conduct of the study. HH reports this grant from NIHR HTA, during the conduct of the study. MB reports grants from NIHR HTA during the conduct of the study. CG reports grants from NIHR, during the conduct of the study; grants from NIHR, grants from Medical Research Foundation, grants from Mason Medical Research Foundation, grants and personal fees from Chiesi Pharmaceuticals, grants from Rosetrees Foundation, grants from Canadian Institute for Health Research, outside the submitted work. FV reports personal fees from Baxter, personal fees from Nutricia, outside the submitted work. LT reports grants from NIHR during the conduct of the study. Funding This work was supported by NIHR HTA programme as part of a larger NIHR HTA-funded feasibility study (grant number 16/94/02).
Keywords: gastroenterology, measurement, neonatology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 484998
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/484998
PURE UUID: 3734d95d-bb42-4248-9ebc-7495dd3e8db4
ORCID for Jon Dorling: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-3221

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Nov 2023 18:38
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jon Dorling ORCID iD
Author: Lyvonne Tume
Author: Barbara Arch
Author: Kerry Woolfall
Author: Lynne Latten
Author: Louise Roper
Author: Elizabeth Deja
Author: Nazima Pathan
Author: Helen Eccleson
Author: Helen Hickey
Author: Michaela Brown
Author: Anne Beissel
Author: Izabela Andrzejewska
Author: Frederic Valla
Author: Chris Gale

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×