The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Extremely growth-retarded infants: is there a viability centile?

Extremely growth-retarded infants: is there a viability centile?
Extremely growth-retarded infants: is there a viability centile?

BACKGROUND. It is known that extremely premature infants do less well than more mature infants, and this fact has led some countries to adopt a "cutoff for viability" using birth weight or gestation. Infants affected by intrauterine growth retardation are at additional risk of poor outcome. There are few data to inform decisions about viability and (dis)continuation of intensive care when both extreme prematurity and severe growth retardation are present. OBJECTIVE. We focused on (1) premature infants affected by marked intrauterine growth retardation to determine if there was a cutoff weight centile below which the mortality sharply increased and (2) the short-term outcome of extremely premature and growth-retarded infants to determine a cutoff for viability. METHODS. We evaluated preterm infants of 22-32 weeks' gestation if they were alive at the onset of labor and born to European mothers resident in the Trent (United Kingdom) health region between 1994 and 2003. Infants were categorized into 6 weight centiles, and infants in each category were assessed for survival to discharge from the neonatal unit, duration of respiratory support, length of stay in the neonatal unit, and the age at death in nonsurvivors. RESULTS. We identified a total of 8228 infants who met the study criteria. Of these, 4448 infants were male, 6194 were from singleton pregnancies, and 2887 were born at ≤28 completed weeks of gestation. Survival to discharge was markedly reduced in the infants born at ≤28 weeks of gestation with a birth weight less than the 2nd centile. Stillbirth was inversely related to birth weight centile in infants born before 29 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSIONS. The survival for infants born at ≤28 weeks' gestation and having a birth weight in less than the 2nd centile is poor, and consideration should be given to modifying their management.

Birth weight, Extreme preterm, Intrauterine growth restriction, Mortality, Outcome
0031-4005
758-763
Kamoji, Vishwanath M.
1209b95b-ebb1-4804-a644-a8cad31efe00
Dorling, Jon S.
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Manktelow, Bradley N.
004657a2-54f8-4bbf-97da-62bf471a3411
Draper, Elizabeth S.
9c1d3580-fa21-4268-a182-6ffc62d0520a
Field, David J.
92b4196a-0df1-4130-8ed7-3c6e08b9dcb6
Kamoji, Vishwanath M.
1209b95b-ebb1-4804-a644-a8cad31efe00
Dorling, Jon S.
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Manktelow, Bradley N.
004657a2-54f8-4bbf-97da-62bf471a3411
Draper, Elizabeth S.
9c1d3580-fa21-4268-a182-6ffc62d0520a
Field, David J.
92b4196a-0df1-4130-8ed7-3c6e08b9dcb6

Kamoji, Vishwanath M., Dorling, Jon S., Manktelow, Bradley N., Draper, Elizabeth S. and Field, David J. (2006) Extremely growth-retarded infants: is there a viability centile? Pediatrics, 118 (2), 758-763. (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2399).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND. It is known that extremely premature infants do less well than more mature infants, and this fact has led some countries to adopt a "cutoff for viability" using birth weight or gestation. Infants affected by intrauterine growth retardation are at additional risk of poor outcome. There are few data to inform decisions about viability and (dis)continuation of intensive care when both extreme prematurity and severe growth retardation are present. OBJECTIVE. We focused on (1) premature infants affected by marked intrauterine growth retardation to determine if there was a cutoff weight centile below which the mortality sharply increased and (2) the short-term outcome of extremely premature and growth-retarded infants to determine a cutoff for viability. METHODS. We evaluated preterm infants of 22-32 weeks' gestation if they were alive at the onset of labor and born to European mothers resident in the Trent (United Kingdom) health region between 1994 and 2003. Infants were categorized into 6 weight centiles, and infants in each category were assessed for survival to discharge from the neonatal unit, duration of respiratory support, length of stay in the neonatal unit, and the age at death in nonsurvivors. RESULTS. We identified a total of 8228 infants who met the study criteria. Of these, 4448 infants were male, 6194 were from singleton pregnancies, and 2887 were born at ≤28 completed weeks of gestation. Survival to discharge was markedly reduced in the infants born at ≤28 weeks of gestation with a birth weight less than the 2nd centile. Stillbirth was inversely related to birth weight centile in infants born before 29 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSIONS. The survival for infants born at ≤28 weeks' gestation and having a birth weight in less than the 2nd centile is poor, and consideration should be given to modifying their management.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 August 2006
Keywords: Birth weight, Extreme preterm, Intrauterine growth restriction, Mortality, Outcome

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485049
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485049
ISSN: 0031-4005
PURE UUID: 545fe332-1689-4588-9f4d-5408085a2221
ORCID for Jon S. Dorling: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-3221

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Nov 2023 18:02
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Vishwanath M. Kamoji
Author: Jon S. Dorling ORCID iD
Author: Bradley N. Manktelow
Author: Elizabeth S. Draper
Author: David J. Field

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×