The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Neonatal outcomes and delivery of care for infants born late preterm or moderately preterm: a prospective population-based study

Neonatal outcomes and delivery of care for infants born late preterm or moderately preterm: a prospective population-based study
Neonatal outcomes and delivery of care for infants born late preterm or moderately preterm: a prospective population-based study

Objective: To describe neonatal outcomes and explore variation in delivery of care for infants born late (34-36 weeks) and moderately (32-33 weeks) preterm (LMPT). Design/setting Prospective population-based study comprising births in four major maternity centres, one midwifery-led unit and at home between September 2009 and December 2010. Data were obtained from maternal and neonatal records. Participants: All LMPT infants were eligible. A random sample of term-born infants (≥37 weeks) acted as controls. Outcome measures Neonatal unit (NNU) admission, respiratory and nutritional support, neonatal morbidities, investigations, length of stay and postnatal ward care were measured. Differences between centres were explored. Results 1146 (83%) LMPT and 1258 (79% of eligible) term-born infants were recruited. LMPT infants were significantly more likely to receive resuscitation at birth (17.5% vs 7.4%), respiratory (11.8% vs 0.9%) and nutritional support (3.5% vs 0.3%) and were less likely to be fed breast milk (64.2% vs 72.2%) than term infants. For all interventions and morbidities, a gradient of increasing risk with decreasing gestation was evident. Although 60% of late preterm infants were never admitted to a NNU, 83% required medical input on postnatal wards. Clinical management differed significantly between services. Conclusions: LMPT infants place high demands on specialist neonatal services. A substantial amount of previously unreported specialist input is provided in postnatal wards, beyond normal newborn care. Appropriate expertise and planning of early care are essential if such infants are managed away from specialised neonatal settings. Further research is required to clarify optimal and cost-effective postnatal management for LMPT babies.

1359-2998
F479-F485
Boyle, Elaine M.
0a18aac0-3ba2-4463-a07c-f5957ed4ceb7
Johnson, Samantha
8f2aac0f-4125-4f18-864c-1cf2799d31bc
Manktelow, Bradley
004657a2-54f8-4bbf-97da-62bf471a3411
Seaton, Sarah E.
ac7a38b8-8612-48a2-ad41-cab4326f8810
Draper, Elizabeth S.
9c1d3580-fa21-4268-a182-6ffc62d0520a
Smith, Lucy K.
835f8b9b-b6e0-4f5f-b6b4-a48c7913b463
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Marlow, Neil
52640c1c-dd5c-4bea-9694-bbfe1146e645
Petrou, Stavros
5ee930f5-99db-4fb8-b401-95584cff0e20
Field, David J.
92b4196a-0df1-4130-8ed7-3c6e08b9dcb6
Boyle, Elaine M.
0a18aac0-3ba2-4463-a07c-f5957ed4ceb7
Johnson, Samantha
8f2aac0f-4125-4f18-864c-1cf2799d31bc
Manktelow, Bradley
004657a2-54f8-4bbf-97da-62bf471a3411
Seaton, Sarah E.
ac7a38b8-8612-48a2-ad41-cab4326f8810
Draper, Elizabeth S.
9c1d3580-fa21-4268-a182-6ffc62d0520a
Smith, Lucy K.
835f8b9b-b6e0-4f5f-b6b4-a48c7913b463
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Marlow, Neil
52640c1c-dd5c-4bea-9694-bbfe1146e645
Petrou, Stavros
5ee930f5-99db-4fb8-b401-95584cff0e20
Field, David J.
92b4196a-0df1-4130-8ed7-3c6e08b9dcb6

Boyle, Elaine M., Johnson, Samantha, Manktelow, Bradley, Seaton, Sarah E., Draper, Elizabeth S., Smith, Lucy K., Dorling, Jon, Marlow, Neil, Petrou, Stavros and Field, David J. (2015) Neonatal outcomes and delivery of care for infants born late preterm or moderately preterm: a prospective population-based study. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 100 (6), F479-F485. (doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-307347).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: To describe neonatal outcomes and explore variation in delivery of care for infants born late (34-36 weeks) and moderately (32-33 weeks) preterm (LMPT). Design/setting Prospective population-based study comprising births in four major maternity centres, one midwifery-led unit and at home between September 2009 and December 2010. Data were obtained from maternal and neonatal records. Participants: All LMPT infants were eligible. A random sample of term-born infants (≥37 weeks) acted as controls. Outcome measures Neonatal unit (NNU) admission, respiratory and nutritional support, neonatal morbidities, investigations, length of stay and postnatal ward care were measured. Differences between centres were explored. Results 1146 (83%) LMPT and 1258 (79% of eligible) term-born infants were recruited. LMPT infants were significantly more likely to receive resuscitation at birth (17.5% vs 7.4%), respiratory (11.8% vs 0.9%) and nutritional support (3.5% vs 0.3%) and were less likely to be fed breast milk (64.2% vs 72.2%) than term infants. For all interventions and morbidities, a gradient of increasing risk with decreasing gestation was evident. Although 60% of late preterm infants were never admitted to a NNU, 83% required medical input on postnatal wards. Clinical management differed significantly between services. Conclusions: LMPT infants place high demands on specialist neonatal services. A substantial amount of previously unreported specialist input is provided in postnatal wards, beyond normal newborn care. Appropriate expertise and planning of early care are essential if such infants are managed away from specialised neonatal settings. Further research is required to clarify optimal and cost-effective postnatal management for LMPT babies.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 November 2015
Additional Information: Funding Information: We would like to thank families who participated in LAMBS. This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) Programme (Grant Reference Number RP-PG-0407-10029). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Neil Marlow receives a proportion of funding from the Department of Health''s NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme at UCLH/UCL. National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485059
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485059
ISSN: 1359-2998
PURE UUID: 39e6c947-ad6d-43f2-9624-69f4ca7d7571
ORCID for Jon Dorling: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-3221

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Nov 2023 18:05
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Elaine M. Boyle
Author: Samantha Johnson
Author: Bradley Manktelow
Author: Sarah E. Seaton
Author: Elizabeth S. Draper
Author: Lucy K. Smith
Author: Jon Dorling ORCID iD
Author: Neil Marlow
Author: Stavros Petrou
Author: David J. Field

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×