The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The perceptual quality of the Oculus Rift for immersive virtual reality

The perceptual quality of the Oculus Rift for immersive virtual reality
The perceptual quality of the Oculus Rift for immersive virtual reality

The recent release of the Oculus Rift, originally developed for entertainment applications, has reignited the interest of researchers and clinicians toward the use of head-mounted-displays in basic behavioral research and physical and psychological rehabilitation. However, careful evaluation of the Oculus Rift is necessary to determine whether it can be effectively used in these novel applications. In this article we address two issues concerning the perceptual quality of the Oculus Rift. (a) Is the Oculus able to generate an acceptable degree of immersivity? In particular, is it possible to elicit the sensation of presence via the virtual stimuli rendered by the device? (b) Does the Virtual Reality experienced through the Oculus Rift induce physical discomfort? To answer these questions, we employed four virtual scenarios in three separate experiments and evaluated performance with objective and subjective outcomes. In Experiment 1 we monitored observers’ heart rate and asked them to rate their Virtual Reality experience via a custom questionnaire. In Experiment 2 we monitored observers’ head movements in reaction to virtual obstacles and asked them to fill out the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (Kennedy et al., 1993) both before and after experiencing Virtual Reality. In Experiment 3 we compared the Oculus Rift against two other low-cost devices used in immersive Virtual Reality: the Google cardboard and a standard 3DTV monitor. Observers’ heart rate increased during exposure to Virtual Reality, and they subjectively reported the experience to be immersive and realistic. We found a strong relationship between observers’ fear of heights and vertigo experienced during one of the virtual scenarios involving heights, suggesting that observers felt a strong sensation of presence within the virtual worlds. Subjects reacted to virtual obstacles by moving to avoid them, suggesting that the obstacles were perceived as real threats. Observers did not experience simulator sickness when the exposure to Virtual Reality was short and did not induce excessive amounts of vection. Compared to the other devices the Oculus Rift elicited a greater degree of immersivity. Thus our investigation suggests that the Oculus Rift head-mounted-display is a potentially powerful tool for a wide array of basic research and clinical applications.

0737-0024
51-82
Chessa, Manuela
6a3ac515-782f-44a0-9a4e-85ffceb710c5
Maiello, Guido
c122b089-1bbc-4d3e-b178-b0a1b31a5295
Borsari, Alessia
73326990-df56-4adb-839a-73b8dc8ba2b4
Bex, Peter J.
6e6bd07d-1136-4163-91d1-1144ef209570
Chessa, Manuela
6a3ac515-782f-44a0-9a4e-85ffceb710c5
Maiello, Guido
c122b089-1bbc-4d3e-b178-b0a1b31a5295
Borsari, Alessia
73326990-df56-4adb-839a-73b8dc8ba2b4
Bex, Peter J.
6e6bd07d-1136-4163-91d1-1144ef209570

Chessa, Manuela, Maiello, Guido, Borsari, Alessia and Bex, Peter J. (2019) The perceptual quality of the Oculus Rift for immersive virtual reality. Human-Computer Interaction, 34 (1), 51-82. (doi:10.1080/07370024.2016.1243478).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The recent release of the Oculus Rift, originally developed for entertainment applications, has reignited the interest of researchers and clinicians toward the use of head-mounted-displays in basic behavioral research and physical and psychological rehabilitation. However, careful evaluation of the Oculus Rift is necessary to determine whether it can be effectively used in these novel applications. In this article we address two issues concerning the perceptual quality of the Oculus Rift. (a) Is the Oculus able to generate an acceptable degree of immersivity? In particular, is it possible to elicit the sensation of presence via the virtual stimuli rendered by the device? (b) Does the Virtual Reality experienced through the Oculus Rift induce physical discomfort? To answer these questions, we employed four virtual scenarios in three separate experiments and evaluated performance with objective and subjective outcomes. In Experiment 1 we monitored observers’ heart rate and asked them to rate their Virtual Reality experience via a custom questionnaire. In Experiment 2 we monitored observers’ head movements in reaction to virtual obstacles and asked them to fill out the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (Kennedy et al., 1993) both before and after experiencing Virtual Reality. In Experiment 3 we compared the Oculus Rift against two other low-cost devices used in immersive Virtual Reality: the Google cardboard and a standard 3DTV monitor. Observers’ heart rate increased during exposure to Virtual Reality, and they subjectively reported the experience to be immersive and realistic. We found a strong relationship between observers’ fear of heights and vertigo experienced during one of the virtual scenarios involving heights, suggesting that observers felt a strong sensation of presence within the virtual worlds. Subjects reacted to virtual obstacles by moving to avoid them, suggesting that the obstacles were perceived as real threats. Observers did not experience simulator sickness when the exposure to Virtual Reality was short and did not induce excessive amounts of vection. Compared to the other devices the Oculus Rift elicited a greater degree of immersivity. Thus our investigation suggests that the Oculus Rift head-mounted-display is a potentially powerful tool for a wide array of basic research and clinical applications.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 2 January 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485115
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485115
ISSN: 0737-0024
PURE UUID: 951fb121-e371-4ca7-82ef-9011677fb1d9
ORCID for Guido Maiello: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6625-2583

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Nov 2023 17:58
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Manuela Chessa
Author: Guido Maiello ORCID iD
Author: Alessia Borsari
Author: Peter J. Bex

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×