In pursuit of stability in the New Europe: Czechoslovak and Yugoslav constitutional questions in British political discourse, 1918-1939
In pursuit of stability in the New Europe: Czechoslovak and Yugoslav constitutional questions in British political discourse, 1918-1939
This thesis examines British attitudes towards the constitutional questions in Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia. The dichotomy between centralism and federalism profoundly shaped the political affairs in the two successor states as well as the relations between their ethnic groups. In both cases, this would become a major destabilising problem that would play an important role in their eventual disintegration in 1939 and 1941 respectively. Given the impact it had on stability of some of the largest countries in an already volatile region, this issue could not escape the attention of British policymakers. Throughout the period, Britain was concerned with maintaining peace and order on the Continent. As such, appeasing disputes, even if entirely domestic, and finding solutions to resolve them became an important element of British foreign policy in the interwar period. When it came to Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, this by extension meant that the Foreign Office was forced to grapple with complex issue of federalisation in those two countries, particularly with regard to its potential to further consolidate the two successor states and therefore make them less susceptible to disintegration. This study analyses how federalism as a system of organisation was perceived in Britain between 1918 and 1939. By comparing and contrasting the British approach to federal demands in Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, it highlights a variety of factors which determined when federalism was seen as a viable state-building tool. In doings so, this thesis does not only re-examine the place that federalism occupied in British political discourse at a time but also situates it at the heart of British foreign policymaking, thereby providing a new perspective on the process of attitude formation in British governmental circles in the interwar period. It shows that whilst ultimately, federal schemes were not viewed as a universally ideal remedy for multi-national states, they were one that Whitehall repeatedly relied on when faced with instability and the prospect of conflict.
University of Southampton
Vrkic, Dora
9bc43c08-4a19-432e-b47c-d94c8d76cec5
Vrkic, Dora
9bc43c08-4a19-432e-b47c-d94c8d76cec5
Cornwall, Mark
f2d16f7c-0f9a-4d92-8c0e-b02d3216f773
Prior, Christopher
01a410aa-e20e-4b41-922c-7b2adf8a9265
Vrkic, Dora
(2023)
In pursuit of stability in the New Europe: Czechoslovak and Yugoslav constitutional questions in British political discourse, 1918-1939.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 202pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
This thesis examines British attitudes towards the constitutional questions in Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia. The dichotomy between centralism and federalism profoundly shaped the political affairs in the two successor states as well as the relations between their ethnic groups. In both cases, this would become a major destabilising problem that would play an important role in their eventual disintegration in 1939 and 1941 respectively. Given the impact it had on stability of some of the largest countries in an already volatile region, this issue could not escape the attention of British policymakers. Throughout the period, Britain was concerned with maintaining peace and order on the Continent. As such, appeasing disputes, even if entirely domestic, and finding solutions to resolve them became an important element of British foreign policy in the interwar period. When it came to Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, this by extension meant that the Foreign Office was forced to grapple with complex issue of federalisation in those two countries, particularly with regard to its potential to further consolidate the two successor states and therefore make them less susceptible to disintegration. This study analyses how federalism as a system of organisation was perceived in Britain between 1918 and 1939. By comparing and contrasting the British approach to federal demands in Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, it highlights a variety of factors which determined when federalism was seen as a viable state-building tool. In doings so, this thesis does not only re-examine the place that federalism occupied in British political discourse at a time but also situates it at the heart of British foreign policymaking, thereby providing a new perspective on the process of attitude formation in British governmental circles in the interwar period. It shows that whilst ultimately, federal schemes were not viewed as a universally ideal remedy for multi-national states, they were one that Whitehall repeatedly relied on when faced with instability and the prospect of conflict.
Text
Dora Vrkic Doctoral Thesis PDFA
- Version of Record
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Miss-Dora-Vrkic
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Submitted date: November 2023
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 485150
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485150
PURE UUID: c5fdaa42-8035-4cd1-9479-fda94a44ab0a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Nov 2023 17:36
Last modified: 20 Mar 2024 02:58
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Dora Vrkic
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics