The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

COVID-19 vaccine for people who live and work in prisons worldwide: a scoping review

COVID-19 vaccine for people who live and work in prisons worldwide: a scoping review
COVID-19 vaccine for people who live and work in prisons worldwide: a scoping review

Overcrowding, poor conditions, and high population turnover make prisons highly susceptible to COVID-19. Vaccination is key to controlling COVID-19, yet there is disagreement regarding whether people who live and work in prisons should be prioritised in national vaccination programmes. To help resolve this, we critically examine the extent, nature, and quality of extant literature regarding prioritisation of COVID-19 vaccinations for people who live and work in prisons. Using a scoping review as our methodological framework, we conducted a systematic literature search of 17 databases. From 2,307 potentially eligible articles, we removed duplicates and screened titles and abstracts to retain 45 articles for review and quality appraisal. Findings indicated that while most countries recognise that prisons are at risk of high levels of COVID-19 transmission, only a minority have explicitly prioritised people who live and work in prisons for COVID-19 vaccination. Even among those that have, prioritisation criteria vary considerably. This is set against a backdrop of political barriers, such as politicians questioning the moral deservingness of people in prison; policy barriers, such as the absence of a unified international framework of how vaccine prioritisation should proceed in prisons; logistical barriers regarding vaccine administration in prisons; and behavioural barriers including vaccine hesitancy. We outline five strategies to prioritise people who live and work in prisons in COVID-19 vaccination plans: (1) improving data collection on COVID-19 vaccination, (2) reducing the number of people imprisoned, (3) tackling vaccine populism through advocacy, (4) challenging arbitrary prioritisation processes via legal processes, and (5) conducting more empirical research on COVID-19 vaccination planning, delivery, and acceptability. Implementing these strategies would help to reduce the impact of COVID-19 on the prison population, prevent community transmission, improve vaccine uptake in prisons beyond the current pandemic, foster political accountability, and inform future decision-making.

COVID-19/epidemiology, COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Prisons, Vaccination
1932-6203
Ismail, Nasrul
6e3ce44a-6400-40ba-b887-0dd86c5f177d
Tavoschi, Lara
7afb4e1d-dc8c-481f-af69-dfa933d40e48
Moazen, Babak
74146d47-75ee-4644-bb6e-22179b892bf0
Roselló, Alicia
77b4b8ef-e577-45d2-adee-0547f2be367e
Plugge, Emma
b64d2086-6cf2-4fae-98bf-6aafa3115b35
Ismail, Nasrul
6e3ce44a-6400-40ba-b887-0dd86c5f177d
Tavoschi, Lara
7afb4e1d-dc8c-481f-af69-dfa933d40e48
Moazen, Babak
74146d47-75ee-4644-bb6e-22179b892bf0
Roselló, Alicia
77b4b8ef-e577-45d2-adee-0547f2be367e
Plugge, Emma
b64d2086-6cf2-4fae-98bf-6aafa3115b35

Ismail, Nasrul, Tavoschi, Lara, Moazen, Babak, Roselló, Alicia and Plugge, Emma (2022) COVID-19 vaccine for people who live and work in prisons worldwide: a scoping review. PLoS ONE, 17 (9), [e0267070]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267070).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Overcrowding, poor conditions, and high population turnover make prisons highly susceptible to COVID-19. Vaccination is key to controlling COVID-19, yet there is disagreement regarding whether people who live and work in prisons should be prioritised in national vaccination programmes. To help resolve this, we critically examine the extent, nature, and quality of extant literature regarding prioritisation of COVID-19 vaccinations for people who live and work in prisons. Using a scoping review as our methodological framework, we conducted a systematic literature search of 17 databases. From 2,307 potentially eligible articles, we removed duplicates and screened titles and abstracts to retain 45 articles for review and quality appraisal. Findings indicated that while most countries recognise that prisons are at risk of high levels of COVID-19 transmission, only a minority have explicitly prioritised people who live and work in prisons for COVID-19 vaccination. Even among those that have, prioritisation criteria vary considerably. This is set against a backdrop of political barriers, such as politicians questioning the moral deservingness of people in prison; policy barriers, such as the absence of a unified international framework of how vaccine prioritisation should proceed in prisons; logistical barriers regarding vaccine administration in prisons; and behavioural barriers including vaccine hesitancy. We outline five strategies to prioritise people who live and work in prisons in COVID-19 vaccination plans: (1) improving data collection on COVID-19 vaccination, (2) reducing the number of people imprisoned, (3) tackling vaccine populism through advocacy, (4) challenging arbitrary prioritisation processes via legal processes, and (5) conducting more empirical research on COVID-19 vaccination planning, delivery, and acceptability. Implementing these strategies would help to reduce the impact of COVID-19 on the prison population, prevent community transmission, improve vaccine uptake in prisons beyond the current pandemic, foster political accountability, and inform future decision-making.

Text
journal.pone.0267070 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (592kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 August 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 September 2022
Keywords: COVID-19/epidemiology, COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Prisons, Vaccination

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485210
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485210
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 853d31ca-613b-4177-89f8-561b62836b55
ORCID for Emma Plugge: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8359-0071

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Dec 2023 17:38
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 02:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nasrul Ismail
Author: Lara Tavoschi
Author: Babak Moazen
Author: Alicia Roselló
Author: Emma Plugge ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×