The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Prevalence of risk factors for non-communicable diseases in prison populations worldwide: a systematic review

Prevalence of risk factors for non-communicable diseases in prison populations worldwide: a systematic review
Prevalence of risk factors for non-communicable diseases in prison populations worldwide: a systematic review

Background: the burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is disproportionately carried by low-income and middle-income countries and disadvantaged sectors of society such as prisoners. No systematic analysis has been done to assess the prevalence of poor diet, inadequate physical activity, and overweight and obesity in prisoners. We aim to synthesise current evidence and to highlight areas for action and further research.

Methods: we systematically searched online databases for reports published between 1948 and May, 2011. Studies were screened against eligibility criteria; two authors then independently extracted data with previously agreed proformas. The risk of bias was assessed for each study with a domain-based assessment. Data on body-mass index and physical activity were presented in forest plots; no overall estimates were calculated on account of data heterogeneity. Available data from the population subgroup most similar in terms of age and sex were used to calculate age-adjusted and sex-adjusted prevalence ratios, which estimate the likelihood of insufficient activity and obesity prevalence in prisoners compared with the national population.

Findings: 31 eligible studies were reported in 29 publications, including more than 60,000 prisoners in 884 institutions in 15 countries. Male prisoners were less likely to be obese than males in the general population (prevalence ratios ranged from 0·33 to 0·87) in all but one study (1·02, 0·92-1·07), whereas female prisoners were more likely to be obese than non-imprisoned women in the USA (1·18, 1·08-1·30) and Australia (prevalence ratios ranged from 1·15 to 1·20). Australian prisoners were more likely to achieve sufficient activity levels than the general population compared with prisoners in the UK (prevalence ratio 1·19, 95% CI 1·04-1·37, for women in Australia in 2009 vs 0·32, 0·21-0·47, for women in the UK; prevalence ratios ranged from 1·37 to 1·59 for men in Australia vs 0·71, 0·34-0·78, for men in the UK). Female mean energy intake exceeded recommended levels and sodium intake was about two to three times the recommended intake for all prisoners.

Interpretation: contact with the criminal justice system is a public-health opportunity to promote health in this vulnerable population; the costs to the individual and to society of failing to do so are likely to be substantial. Improved monitoring and further research is essential to inform appropriate targeting of public health interventions.

Funding: Oxford University Department of Public Health, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust.

Adult, Body Mass Index, Diet/statistics & numerical data, Energy Intake, Exercise, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity/epidemiology, Overweight/epidemiology, Prevalence, Prisoners/statistics & numerical data, Risk Factors, Young Adult
0140-6736
1975-82
Herbert, Katharine
ff262ce2-c608-4538-895f-f9bbe06b985e
Plugge, Emma
b64d2086-6cf2-4fae-98bf-6aafa3115b35
Foster, Charles
9b05794a-f12e-403e-aec4-7602c48b6428
Doll, Helen
235c881b-5763-4866-8e6d-ba9862cd2405
Herbert, Katharine
ff262ce2-c608-4538-895f-f9bbe06b985e
Plugge, Emma
b64d2086-6cf2-4fae-98bf-6aafa3115b35
Foster, Charles
9b05794a-f12e-403e-aec4-7602c48b6428
Doll, Helen
235c881b-5763-4866-8e6d-ba9862cd2405

Herbert, Katharine, Plugge, Emma, Foster, Charles and Doll, Helen (2012) Prevalence of risk factors for non-communicable diseases in prison populations worldwide: a systematic review. The Lancet, 379 (9830), 1975-82. (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60319-5).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Background: the burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is disproportionately carried by low-income and middle-income countries and disadvantaged sectors of society such as prisoners. No systematic analysis has been done to assess the prevalence of poor diet, inadequate physical activity, and overweight and obesity in prisoners. We aim to synthesise current evidence and to highlight areas for action and further research.

Methods: we systematically searched online databases for reports published between 1948 and May, 2011. Studies were screened against eligibility criteria; two authors then independently extracted data with previously agreed proformas. The risk of bias was assessed for each study with a domain-based assessment. Data on body-mass index and physical activity were presented in forest plots; no overall estimates were calculated on account of data heterogeneity. Available data from the population subgroup most similar in terms of age and sex were used to calculate age-adjusted and sex-adjusted prevalence ratios, which estimate the likelihood of insufficient activity and obesity prevalence in prisoners compared with the national population.

Findings: 31 eligible studies were reported in 29 publications, including more than 60,000 prisoners in 884 institutions in 15 countries. Male prisoners were less likely to be obese than males in the general population (prevalence ratios ranged from 0·33 to 0·87) in all but one study (1·02, 0·92-1·07), whereas female prisoners were more likely to be obese than non-imprisoned women in the USA (1·18, 1·08-1·30) and Australia (prevalence ratios ranged from 1·15 to 1·20). Australian prisoners were more likely to achieve sufficient activity levels than the general population compared with prisoners in the UK (prevalence ratio 1·19, 95% CI 1·04-1·37, for women in Australia in 2009 vs 0·32, 0·21-0·47, for women in the UK; prevalence ratios ranged from 1·37 to 1·59 for men in Australia vs 0·71, 0·34-0·78, for men in the UK). Female mean energy intake exceeded recommended levels and sodium intake was about two to three times the recommended intake for all prisoners.

Interpretation: contact with the criminal justice system is a public-health opportunity to promote health in this vulnerable population; the costs to the individual and to society of failing to do so are likely to be substantial. Improved monitoring and further research is essential to inform appropriate targeting of public health interventions.

Funding: Oxford University Department of Public Health, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 19 April 2012
Published date: 26 May 2012
Keywords: Adult, Body Mass Index, Diet/statistics & numerical data, Energy Intake, Exercise, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity/epidemiology, Overweight/epidemiology, Prevalence, Prisoners/statistics & numerical data, Risk Factors, Young Adult

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485243
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485243
ISSN: 0140-6736
PURE UUID: 3415c802-7181-4660-a57c-bbf2cdfd65c1
ORCID for Emma Plugge: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8359-0071

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Dec 2023 17:46
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Katharine Herbert
Author: Emma Plugge ORCID iD
Author: Charles Foster
Author: Helen Doll

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×