The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions for risk factors correlate weakly with global risk factor burden: a cross-sectional study

Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions for risk factors correlate weakly with global risk factor burden: a cross-sectional study
Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions for risk factors correlate weakly with global risk factor burden: a cross-sectional study

Background and objectives: systematic reviews (SRs) are important for health-care decision-makers requiring evidence for interventions that target modifiable risk factors to prevent disease. We investigated whether Cochrane SR output correlated with risk factor burden as assessed by the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Methods: we screened and extracted data from Cochrane reviews and protocols published since January 2011 investigating modifiable risk factors as outcomes. We calculated Spearman's rank correlation between number of occasions a risk factor was an SR outcome and that risk factor's global disease burden in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). We also calculated standardized Pearson residuals (SPRs) of the variance between the observed and expected frequency of a risk factor featuring as an outcome.

Results: we obtained 400 unique SRs and 174 unique protocols from 6,392 Cochrane publications. Risk factors were an outcome a total of 965 times. The number of SR outcomes and DALYs per risk factor shared a weak-positive correlation (r = 0.45) for all risk factors, but was high (r = 0.83) for metabolic risks, similar for behavioral risks (r = 0.46), and weak negative for occupational and environmental risks (r = -0.40). SPRs for "high total cholesterol", "low bone mineral density", "alcohol and drug use" , and "child and maternal malnutrition" inferred a higher than expected frequency of outcomes, and for "air pollution", "dietary risk", and "unsafe water, sanitation, and hand-washing", fewer than expected.

Conclusion: our study investigated whether Cochrane risk factor SRs align with global risk factor burden, demonstrating a weak-positive correlation. Interventions modifying air pollution and dietary risks were sparsely studied, given disease burden.

Clinical Decision-Making, Cross-Sectional Studies, Global Burden of Disease/methods, Humans, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Systematic Reviews as Topic
0895-4356
103-110
Roberts, David J.
67d9b234-4b0f-4d3c-9116-ae8035f97230
Cafferkey, John
fe311a55-c377-4035-a4e7-5db1887fe574
Plugge, Emma
b64d2086-6cf2-4fae-98bf-6aafa3115b35
Roberts, David J.
67d9b234-4b0f-4d3c-9116-ae8035f97230
Cafferkey, John
fe311a55-c377-4035-a4e7-5db1887fe574
Plugge, Emma
b64d2086-6cf2-4fae-98bf-6aafa3115b35

Roberts, David J., Cafferkey, John and Plugge, Emma (2018) Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions for risk factors correlate weakly with global risk factor burden: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 97, 103-110. (doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.002).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background and objectives: systematic reviews (SRs) are important for health-care decision-makers requiring evidence for interventions that target modifiable risk factors to prevent disease. We investigated whether Cochrane SR output correlated with risk factor burden as assessed by the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Methods: we screened and extracted data from Cochrane reviews and protocols published since January 2011 investigating modifiable risk factors as outcomes. We calculated Spearman's rank correlation between number of occasions a risk factor was an SR outcome and that risk factor's global disease burden in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). We also calculated standardized Pearson residuals (SPRs) of the variance between the observed and expected frequency of a risk factor featuring as an outcome.

Results: we obtained 400 unique SRs and 174 unique protocols from 6,392 Cochrane publications. Risk factors were an outcome a total of 965 times. The number of SR outcomes and DALYs per risk factor shared a weak-positive correlation (r = 0.45) for all risk factors, but was high (r = 0.83) for metabolic risks, similar for behavioral risks (r = 0.46), and weak negative for occupational and environmental risks (r = -0.40). SPRs for "high total cholesterol", "low bone mineral density", "alcohol and drug use" , and "child and maternal malnutrition" inferred a higher than expected frequency of outcomes, and for "air pollution", "dietary risk", and "unsafe water, sanitation, and hand-washing", fewer than expected.

Conclusion: our study investigated whether Cochrane risk factor SRs align with global risk factor burden, demonstrating a weak-positive correlation. Interventions modifying air pollution and dietary risks were sparsely studied, given disease burden.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 26 December 2017
Published date: May 2018
Keywords: Clinical Decision-Making, Cross-Sectional Studies, Global Burden of Disease/methods, Humans, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Systematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485257
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485257
ISSN: 0895-4356
PURE UUID: 88a25410-0908-4364-b32f-2b980cb833bb
ORCID for Emma Plugge: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8359-0071

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Dec 2023 17:50
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: David J. Roberts
Author: John Cafferkey
Author: Emma Plugge ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×