The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in a UK population: a single centre experience

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in a UK population: a single centre experience
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in a UK population: a single centre experience
Aims: Since mid-1970s liver cancer incidence rate increased overall in Great Britain, being now the 18th most common cancer in England. The aim of this study was to analyse our ten-years results related to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment in a UK population, comparing surgical and oncologic outcomes obtained by laparoscopic versus open approach. 
Methods: between January 2005 and December 2014, sixty-two hepatic resection for HCC were performed at our Institution. Patients were divided in two groups: A- patients undergoing open liver resection (OLR), B- patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Intraoperative, postoperative and oncologic outcomes were analysed and compared between the two groups. A subgroup analysis of patients with lesions >5 cm was performed to assess the impact of size on outcomes and patients selection to the laparoscopic approach. 
Results: twenty-six OLR and thirty-six LLR were performed. There were no statistical differences in demographic parameters, incidence of cirrhosis, operative time, margin status, perioperative mortality rate and DFS between the two groups. The median size of the tumours was significantly higher in the open group 8.6 cm vs 5.5 cm (p = 0.035). Patients undergoing LLR had lower blood loss (p = 0.033), shorter high dependency unit (p = 0.005) and general hospital-stay (p = 0.001) and lower 30-days morbidity rate (p = 0.003). Median global survival was 58 months: surprising LLR did positively influenced OS (p = 0.047), with a median survival of 68 months versus the 38 months accomplished with OLR. Laparoscopic approach confirmed favourable outcomes in both perioperative and on oncologic fields also for tumours major than 5 cm in size. 
Conclusions: despite the lower incidence of liver cancer in UK, an increasing number of HCC has been noticed since the early 1990s. Our ten-years experience demonstrates that LLR for HCC is feasible and safe, conferring the widely accepted benefits arising from a mini-invasive approach, and ensuring both perioperative and oncologic favourable outcomes.
1365-182X
e864
Francone, E.
6451da27-c5fe-4efb-b0e6-7ea516333c3b
Cipriani, F.
d8020a7d-e8ac-49f9-a7cc-572ed0e01883
Rawashdeh, M.
132d751f-53ab-4bdb-adb6-46659e49bcff
Shamali, A.
a9db10ba-2cf3-452f-9902-bc5428972034
Hamady, Z.
545a1c81-276e-4341-a420-aa10aa5d8ca8
Takhar, A.
9ed235ad-3b40-40b0-bb76-bfce5b427b71
Armstrong, T.
fe074aba-a53c-4db6-b007-af761cd75235
Pearce, N.W.
27eb0204-f8de-48bf-945b-02003799af54
Primrose, J.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Hilal, M. Abu
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47
Francone, E.
6451da27-c5fe-4efb-b0e6-7ea516333c3b
Cipriani, F.
d8020a7d-e8ac-49f9-a7cc-572ed0e01883
Rawashdeh, M.
132d751f-53ab-4bdb-adb6-46659e49bcff
Shamali, A.
a9db10ba-2cf3-452f-9902-bc5428972034
Hamady, Z.
545a1c81-276e-4341-a420-aa10aa5d8ca8
Takhar, A.
9ed235ad-3b40-40b0-bb76-bfce5b427b71
Armstrong, T.
fe074aba-a53c-4db6-b007-af761cd75235
Pearce, N.W.
27eb0204-f8de-48bf-945b-02003799af54
Primrose, J.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Hilal, M. Abu
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47

Francone, E., Cipriani, F., Rawashdeh, M., Shamali, A., Hamady, Z., Takhar, A., Armstrong, T., Pearce, N.W., Primrose, J. and Hilal, M. Abu (2016) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in a UK population: a single centre experience. HPB, 18, e864. (doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2016.01.493).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Aims: Since mid-1970s liver cancer incidence rate increased overall in Great Britain, being now the 18th most common cancer in England. The aim of this study was to analyse our ten-years results related to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment in a UK population, comparing surgical and oncologic outcomes obtained by laparoscopic versus open approach. 
Methods: between January 2005 and December 2014, sixty-two hepatic resection for HCC were performed at our Institution. Patients were divided in two groups: A- patients undergoing open liver resection (OLR), B- patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Intraoperative, postoperative and oncologic outcomes were analysed and compared between the two groups. A subgroup analysis of patients with lesions >5 cm was performed to assess the impact of size on outcomes and patients selection to the laparoscopic approach. 
Results: twenty-six OLR and thirty-six LLR were performed. There were no statistical differences in demographic parameters, incidence of cirrhosis, operative time, margin status, perioperative mortality rate and DFS between the two groups. The median size of the tumours was significantly higher in the open group 8.6 cm vs 5.5 cm (p = 0.035). Patients undergoing LLR had lower blood loss (p = 0.033), shorter high dependency unit (p = 0.005) and general hospital-stay (p = 0.001) and lower 30-days morbidity rate (p = 0.003). Median global survival was 58 months: surprising LLR did positively influenced OS (p = 0.047), with a median survival of 68 months versus the 38 months accomplished with OLR. Laparoscopic approach confirmed favourable outcomes in both perioperative and on oncologic fields also for tumours major than 5 cm in size. 
Conclusions: despite the lower incidence of liver cancer in UK, an increasing number of HCC has been noticed since the early 1990s. Our ten-years experience demonstrates that LLR for HCC is feasible and safe, conferring the widely accepted benefits arising from a mini-invasive approach, and ensuring both perioperative and oncologic favourable outcomes.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 19 April 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485321
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485321
ISSN: 1365-182X
PURE UUID: 9fbc58fc-a843-46cb-bd01-6229c1fe0ced
ORCID for Z. Hamady: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4591-5226
ORCID for J. Primrose: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-7605

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Dec 2023 17:41
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: E. Francone
Author: F. Cipriani
Author: M. Rawashdeh
Author: A. Shamali
Author: Z. Hamady ORCID iD
Author: A. Takhar
Author: T. Armstrong
Author: N.W. Pearce
Author: J. Primrose ORCID iD
Author: M. Abu Hilal

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×