The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Factors affecting cervical screening uptake in prisoners

Factors affecting cervical screening uptake in prisoners
Factors affecting cervical screening uptake in prisoners

Imprisoned women are at increased risk of cervical cancer but less likely to have been screened for this disease. There is very little information on the situation in prisons in the UK but this study indicates that, as anticipated, these women are less likely to have been screened in the last five years than women generally. Whilst there are no ethnic differences, it appears that women who had been in prison longer than three months were more likely to have had a smear in the last five years compared with those who had been in for three months or less (79.2% vs 37.5%, Chi-squared=9.7, p=0.002) suggesting that the prison health services had been able to use this opportunity to screen this disadvantaged population.

England, Female, Humans, Mass Screening/methods, Prisoners, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control, Vaginal Smears/statistics & numerical data
0969-1413
48-49
Plugge, E.
b64d2086-6cf2-4fae-98bf-6aafa3115b35
Fitzpatrick, R.
5e4b3d19-b38b-46d9-ab64-75df1cbef35e
Plugge, E.
b64d2086-6cf2-4fae-98bf-6aafa3115b35
Fitzpatrick, R.
5e4b3d19-b38b-46d9-ab64-75df1cbef35e

Plugge, E. and Fitzpatrick, R. (2004) Factors affecting cervical screening uptake in prisoners. Journal of Medical Screening, 11 (1), 48-49. (doi:10.1177/096914130301100111).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Imprisoned women are at increased risk of cervical cancer but less likely to have been screened for this disease. There is very little information on the situation in prisons in the UK but this study indicates that, as anticipated, these women are less likely to have been screened in the last five years than women generally. Whilst there are no ethnic differences, it appears that women who had been in prison longer than three months were more likely to have had a smear in the last five years compared with those who had been in for three months or less (79.2% vs 37.5%, Chi-squared=9.7, p=0.002) suggesting that the prison health services had been able to use this opportunity to screen this disadvantaged population.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 January 2004
Published date: March 2004
Keywords: England, Female, Humans, Mass Screening/methods, Prisoners, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control, Vaginal Smears/statistics & numerical data

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485334
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485334
ISSN: 0969-1413
PURE UUID: a7d03398-a99c-4ac2-abc4-8eab7a5eccb1
ORCID for E. Plugge: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8359-0071

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Dec 2023 17:45
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: E. Plugge ORCID iD
Author: R. Fitzpatrick

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×