Peer review of paediatric endocrine services in the UK: a template for quality and service improvement
Peer review of paediatric endocrine services in the UK: a template for quality and service improvement
Background: independent peer review of healthcare services can complement existing internal-, institutional-, and national-level regulatory mechanisms aimed at improving quality of healthcare. However, this has not been reported for paediatric endocrinology services in the UK. We aimed to test feasibility and acceptability through a first cycle of a national peer review of paediatric endocrine services.
Methods: tertiary centres in paediatric endocrinology across the UK were assessed against 54 quality standards, developed by the British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes (BSPED) in five domains of healthcare by a team comprising paediatric endocrinologists and specialist nurses. The evaluation was supported by a self-assessment. A post-peer-review questionnaire was used as feedback.
Results: all 22 centres in the UK underwent independent peer review between 2011 and 2017. Each served a median population of 2.6 million (range 1-8 million) and offered 1,872 (range 779-6,738) outpatient consultations annually. A total of 43 (range 30-49) standards were met in combined evaluation of all centres. Variance of adherence for essential standards ranged from 52 to 97% at individual centres with 90% adherence demonstrated by 32% of centres. Post-review feedback showed 20/22 (95%) validating the utility of the peer review.
Conclusions: the BSPED peer review of all UK centres providing paediatric endocrine services is shown to be feasible and provides a quality benchmark for replication by national services.
Peer review, Quality improvement, Service improvement, Standards of care
616-621
Schulga, John
3e5eb1a9-f80b-4fe3-a055-d349ed981ea4
Mitchell, Heather
3a16d4f8-876b-4e5e-8c59-6e78bba65ad4
Ahmed, S. Faisal
bc7ad024-d257-4165-ac81-e9b064606c40
Albanese, Assunta
e9c88bde-c080-4acb-9b2b-ea84d17f9575
Warner, Justin
1cd0010d-ef8a-4494-be4f-ea14f87e34ec
Davies, Justin H.
9f18fcad-f488-4c72-ac23-c154995443a9
Shaw, Nicholas
80b41c82-74c7-4e65-96b8-2f5688487a07
Banerjee, Indraneel
81247124-c751-4c35-917f-ffb0bbced82e
Patel, Leena
f9dffb37-940c-40c4-b624-922de8d79aea
Schulga, John
3e5eb1a9-f80b-4fe3-a055-d349ed981ea4
Mitchell, Heather
3a16d4f8-876b-4e5e-8c59-6e78bba65ad4
Ahmed, S. Faisal
bc7ad024-d257-4165-ac81-e9b064606c40
Albanese, Assunta
e9c88bde-c080-4acb-9b2b-ea84d17f9575
Warner, Justin
1cd0010d-ef8a-4494-be4f-ea14f87e34ec
Davies, Justin H.
9f18fcad-f488-4c72-ac23-c154995443a9
Shaw, Nicholas
80b41c82-74c7-4e65-96b8-2f5688487a07
Banerjee, Indraneel
81247124-c751-4c35-917f-ffb0bbced82e
Patel, Leena
f9dffb37-940c-40c4-b624-922de8d79aea
Schulga, John, Mitchell, Heather, Ahmed, S. Faisal, Albanese, Assunta, Warner, Justin, Davies, Justin H., Shaw, Nicholas, Banerjee, Indraneel and Patel, Leena
(2021)
Peer review of paediatric endocrine services in the UK: a template for quality and service improvement.
Hormone Research in Paediatrics, 93 (11-12), .
(doi:10.1159/000515238).
Abstract
Background: independent peer review of healthcare services can complement existing internal-, institutional-, and national-level regulatory mechanisms aimed at improving quality of healthcare. However, this has not been reported for paediatric endocrinology services in the UK. We aimed to test feasibility and acceptability through a first cycle of a national peer review of paediatric endocrine services.
Methods: tertiary centres in paediatric endocrinology across the UK were assessed against 54 quality standards, developed by the British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes (BSPED) in five domains of healthcare by a team comprising paediatric endocrinologists and specialist nurses. The evaluation was supported by a self-assessment. A post-peer-review questionnaire was used as feedback.
Results: all 22 centres in the UK underwent independent peer review between 2011 and 2017. Each served a median population of 2.6 million (range 1-8 million) and offered 1,872 (range 779-6,738) outpatient consultations annually. A total of 43 (range 30-49) standards were met in combined evaluation of all centres. Variance of adherence for essential standards ranged from 52 to 97% at individual centres with 90% adherence demonstrated by 32% of centres. Post-review feedback showed 20/22 (95%) validating the utility of the peer review.
Conclusions: the BSPED peer review of all UK centres providing paediatric endocrine services is shown to be feasible and provides a quality benchmark for replication by national services.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 15 February 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 31 March 2021
Keywords:
Peer review, Quality improvement, Service improvement, Standards of care
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 485338
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485338
ISSN: 1663-2818
PURE UUID: 43510cb9-c46d-4318-b542-24292a619045
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Dec 2023 17:51
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 12:51
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
John Schulga
Author:
Heather Mitchell
Author:
S. Faisal Ahmed
Author:
Assunta Albanese
Author:
Justin Warner
Author:
Nicholas Shaw
Author:
Indraneel Banerjee
Author:
Leena Patel
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics