The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Enhanced recovery program after OPEN and laparoscopic liver resection: may IT enhace the advantages offered by the minimally invasive approach?

Enhanced recovery program after OPEN and laparoscopic liver resection: may IT enhace the advantages offered by the minimally invasive approach?
Enhanced recovery program after OPEN and laparoscopic liver resection: may IT enhace the advantages offered by the minimally invasive approach?
Introduction: the present study aimed to determine and compare the impact of enhanced recovery program (ERP) after open and laparoscopic liver resection.

Methods: four standardized perioperative care pathways were developed and implemented in patients undergoing liver resection (major open or laparoscopic, minor open or laparoscopic). Perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups of patients operated before and after the introduction of the ERP.

Results: between December 2008 and December 2016, 787 patients underwent liver resection. Open resection were 315 (40%) and 472 (60%) Laparoscopic. In the open group, hospital stay (LOS) stay was significantly shorter in the ERP group (142 patients) when compared to the control group (173 patients) (median 6, IQ 5 to 8 and 7, IQ 6 to 12 days, respectively, p=0.05). Patients undergoing ERP minimal invasive liver resection (233 patients) had similar LOS compared with the control group (239 patients) (3 IQ 2 to 4 versus 3 IQ 2 to 4 days, p 0.69). Clavien-Dindo > Grade II complications were significantly (p< 0.0001) lower and no 90-day mortality was observed in both open and Laparoscopic ERP groups.

Conclusion(s): the impact of ERP on patients undergoing liver resections has not been clarified yet, especially when considering the expansion of laparoscopic liver surgery. In our experience ERP reduced LOS after open liver resection, although after laparoscopic liver resection LOS was similar. However the minor rate of major complications, such as have been equally witnessed in both groups suggests ERP may further enhance the advantages of the laparoscopic approach.
1365-182X
S426-S426
Giovinazzo, F.
8d54b964-27f5-49bb-aa6f-ec5f41981d30
Rawashdeh, A.
87661d48-873c-453e-b433-923650a74513
Barbaro, S.
fa03217c-8b55-4a58-82da-e544f45a726c
Jayyusi, A.
484ae7e7-5f1e-44a8-9c75-27cbae86cd20
Alzoubi, M.
6842d18c-af9f-4a0b-875c-1e82bbc3c583
Takhar, A.
9ed235ad-3b40-40b0-bb76-bfce5b427b71
Armstrong, T.
fe074aba-a53c-4db6-b007-af761cd75235
Hamady, Z.
545a1c81-276e-4341-a420-aa10aa5d8ca8
Primerose, J.
93752363-708c-4b6d-b3bd-5683c03ce350
Abu Hilal, M.
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47
Giovinazzo, F.
8d54b964-27f5-49bb-aa6f-ec5f41981d30
Rawashdeh, A.
87661d48-873c-453e-b433-923650a74513
Barbaro, S.
fa03217c-8b55-4a58-82da-e544f45a726c
Jayyusi, A.
484ae7e7-5f1e-44a8-9c75-27cbae86cd20
Alzoubi, M.
6842d18c-af9f-4a0b-875c-1e82bbc3c583
Takhar, A.
9ed235ad-3b40-40b0-bb76-bfce5b427b71
Armstrong, T.
fe074aba-a53c-4db6-b007-af761cd75235
Hamady, Z.
545a1c81-276e-4341-a420-aa10aa5d8ca8
Primerose, J.
93752363-708c-4b6d-b3bd-5683c03ce350
Abu Hilal, M.
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47

Giovinazzo, F., Rawashdeh, A., Barbaro, S., Jayyusi, A., Alzoubi, M., Takhar, A., Armstrong, T., Hamady, Z., Primerose, J. and Abu Hilal, M. (2018) Enhanced recovery program after OPEN and laparoscopic liver resection: may IT enhace the advantages offered by the minimally invasive approach? HPB, 20 (Supplement 2), S426-S426. (doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2018.06.2786).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: the present study aimed to determine and compare the impact of enhanced recovery program (ERP) after open and laparoscopic liver resection.

Methods: four standardized perioperative care pathways were developed and implemented in patients undergoing liver resection (major open or laparoscopic, minor open or laparoscopic). Perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups of patients operated before and after the introduction of the ERP.

Results: between December 2008 and December 2016, 787 patients underwent liver resection. Open resection were 315 (40%) and 472 (60%) Laparoscopic. In the open group, hospital stay (LOS) stay was significantly shorter in the ERP group (142 patients) when compared to the control group (173 patients) (median 6, IQ 5 to 8 and 7, IQ 6 to 12 days, respectively, p=0.05). Patients undergoing ERP minimal invasive liver resection (233 patients) had similar LOS compared with the control group (239 patients) (3 IQ 2 to 4 versus 3 IQ 2 to 4 days, p 0.69). Clavien-Dindo > Grade II complications were significantly (p< 0.0001) lower and no 90-day mortality was observed in both open and Laparoscopic ERP groups.

Conclusion(s): the impact of ERP on patients undergoing liver resections has not been clarified yet, especially when considering the expansion of laparoscopic liver surgery. In our experience ERP reduced LOS after open liver resection, although after laparoscopic liver resection LOS was similar. However the minor rate of major complications, such as have been equally witnessed in both groups suggests ERP may further enhance the advantages of the laparoscopic approach.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: September 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485348
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485348
ISSN: 1365-182X
PURE UUID: 702a003c-eaab-4e3f-b7c6-f9b8b5031045
ORCID for Z. Hamady: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4591-5226

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Dec 2023 17:35
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: F. Giovinazzo
Author: A. Rawashdeh
Author: S. Barbaro
Author: A. Jayyusi
Author: M. Alzoubi
Author: A. Takhar
Author: T. Armstrong
Author: Z. Hamady ORCID iD
Author: J. Primerose
Author: M. Abu Hilal

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×