Geographically based investigation of the influence of very-preterm births on routine mortality statistics from the UK and Australia
Geographically based investigation of the influence of very-preterm births on routine mortality statistics from the UK and Australia
Background: Comparisons of national perinatal and neonatal mortality often neglect the underlying causes. Objective: To assess effects of very-preterm births in the UK and Australia. Setting: Two geographically defined populations: the former Trent Health Region of the UK and New South Wales (NSW)/the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Australia. Method: All births 22 +0 to 31+6 weeks in 2000, 2001 and 2002 were identified by established surveys of perinatal care. Rates of birth and death were compared. Results: The population of NSW/ACT was 35% higher and there were 66% more births than in Trent (273 495 vs 164 824). The proportion of liveborn infants between 22 and 31 weeks gestation was about 25% higher in Trent (NSW/ACT 2945, rate per 1000 live births 10.82 (95% CI 10.43 to 11.22); Trent 2208, rate per 1000 live births 13.47 (95% CI 12.92 to 14.05)). The proportion of these infants admitted to a neonatal unit was also higher in Trent (91.2% vs 94.4%; OR 1.63 (95% CI 1.30 to 2.05)). Unadjusted mortality in infants admitted to a neonatal unit was similar: NSW/ACT 332/2686 (12.4%); Trent 284/ 2085 (13.6%); unadjusted OR 1.12 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.33; p = 0.21). Conclusions: The higher rates of very premature birth and more ready admission to neonatal intensive care for infants in the UK may help to explain why perinatal and neonatal mortality are higher there than in Australia. Efforts to understand why the rate of premature birth in the UK is so high should be a national priority.
F212-F216
Field, D. J.
92b4196a-0df1-4130-8ed7-3c6e08b9dcb6
Bajuk, B.
9eb97cc5-63e6-4125-a393-1e9129f403de
Manktelow, B. N.
004657a2-54f8-4bbf-97da-62bf471a3411
Vincent, T.
1c300435-9573-4f7e-a27a-9a9ea64aae6a
Dorling, J.
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Tarnow-Mordi, W.
ae22307e-2faa-4980-8ab3-782bb413e673
Draper, E. S.
a9d1339c-f638-4a4e-822c-e6d8e1635c34
Smart, D. Henderson
e2d494a4-9915-4e4a-8185-481fac53f3fa
21 April 2008
Field, D. J.
92b4196a-0df1-4130-8ed7-3c6e08b9dcb6
Bajuk, B.
9eb97cc5-63e6-4125-a393-1e9129f403de
Manktelow, B. N.
004657a2-54f8-4bbf-97da-62bf471a3411
Vincent, T.
1c300435-9573-4f7e-a27a-9a9ea64aae6a
Dorling, J.
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Tarnow-Mordi, W.
ae22307e-2faa-4980-8ab3-782bb413e673
Draper, E. S.
a9d1339c-f638-4a4e-822c-e6d8e1635c34
Smart, D. Henderson
e2d494a4-9915-4e4a-8185-481fac53f3fa
Field, D. J., Bajuk, B., Manktelow, B. N., Vincent, T., Dorling, J., Tarnow-Mordi, W., Draper, E. S. and Smart, D. Henderson
(2008)
Geographically based investigation of the influence of very-preterm births on routine mortality statistics from the UK and Australia.
Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 93 (3), .
(doi:10.1136/adc.2007.119271).
Abstract
Background: Comparisons of national perinatal and neonatal mortality often neglect the underlying causes. Objective: To assess effects of very-preterm births in the UK and Australia. Setting: Two geographically defined populations: the former Trent Health Region of the UK and New South Wales (NSW)/the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Australia. Method: All births 22 +0 to 31+6 weeks in 2000, 2001 and 2002 were identified by established surveys of perinatal care. Rates of birth and death were compared. Results: The population of NSW/ACT was 35% higher and there were 66% more births than in Trent (273 495 vs 164 824). The proportion of liveborn infants between 22 and 31 weeks gestation was about 25% higher in Trent (NSW/ACT 2945, rate per 1000 live births 10.82 (95% CI 10.43 to 11.22); Trent 2208, rate per 1000 live births 13.47 (95% CI 12.92 to 14.05)). The proportion of these infants admitted to a neonatal unit was also higher in Trent (91.2% vs 94.4%; OR 1.63 (95% CI 1.30 to 2.05)). Unadjusted mortality in infants admitted to a neonatal unit was similar: NSW/ACT 332/2686 (12.4%); Trent 284/ 2085 (13.6%); unadjusted OR 1.12 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.33; p = 0.21). Conclusions: The higher rates of very premature birth and more ready admission to neonatal intensive care for infants in the UK may help to explain why perinatal and neonatal mortality are higher there than in Australia. Efforts to understand why the rate of premature birth in the UK is so high should be a national priority.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 27 September 2007
Published date: 21 April 2008
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 485372
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485372
ISSN: 1359-2998
PURE UUID: 5f2353f2-1cdb-42c5-a01f-7f4f375d9167
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Dec 2023 17:39
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:17
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
D. J. Field
Author:
B. Bajuk
Author:
B. N. Manktelow
Author:
T. Vincent
Author:
J. Dorling
Author:
W. Tarnow-Mordi
Author:
E. S. Draper
Author:
D. Henderson Smart
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics