The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Outcomes of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA Therapy Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Varying NAFLD Status

Outcomes of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA Therapy Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Varying NAFLD Status
Outcomes of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA Therapy Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Varying NAFLD Status
Importance: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a cardiovascular risk factor, but whether sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) reduce cardiovascular risk in T2D patients with concomitant NAFLD remains uncertain.

Objective: to investigate the effectiveness of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA among patients with type 2 diabetes varied by the presence or absence of NAFLD.

Design: retrospective, population-based, nationwide cohort study using an active-comparator new-user design.

Setting: South Korea (January 2013 to December 2020).

Participants: two distinct new-user active-comparator cohorts of patients aged 40+ years who initiated SGLT-2i or GLP-1RA and were; propensity score matched to patients who initiated dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i). After 1:1 PS matching, 140,438 patients were retrieved in the first cohort (mean age 57.5 [SD 10.3]; male 56.7%) and 34,886 patients were identified in the second cohort (mean age 59.5 [SD10.5]; male 51.3%.

Main outcome measures: 1) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite endpoint of hospitalisation for myocardial infarction, hospitalisation for stroke, and cardiovascular death; and 2) hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR). Wald’s test was applied to assess the effect of heterogeneity by NAFLD. Data analysis was performed from October 2022 to March 2023.

Results: compared with DPP-4i, SGLT-2i were associated with a lower risk of MACE (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.71-0.85) and HHF (0.62, 95%CI 0.48-0.81). GLP-1RA were associated with a decreased risk of MACE (0.49, 95% CI 0.39-0.62) but demonstrated statistically insignificant findings regarding HHF (0.64, 95% CI 0.39-1.07). Stratified analysis by NAFLD status yielded consistent results for SGLT-2i (MACE, with NAFLD: 0.73, 95%CI 0.62-0.86 vs without NAFLD: 0.81, 95%CI 0.72-0.91; HHF, with NAFLD: 0.76, 95%CI 0.49-1.17 vs without NAFLD: 0.56, 95%CI 0.40-0.78) and for GLP-1RA (MACE, with NAFLD: 0.49, 95%CI 0.32- 0.77 vs without NAFLD: 0.49, 95%CI 0.37-0.65; HHF, with NAFLD: 0.82, 95%CI 0.38-1.76 vs without NAFLD: 0.54, 95%CI 0.27-1.06).

Conclusions and relevance: in this population-based cohort study, SGLT-2i showed a decreased risk of MACE and HHF, while GLP-1RA decreased the risk of MACE among patients with T2D irrespective of baseline NAFLD status.
2574-3805
e2349856
Bea, Sungho
931c0446-f7c1-45e2-830f-b36517d445be
Jeong, Han Eol
930f14e0-5864-44de-880d-a70e82239f40
Filion, Kristian B.
383a9590-de79-4ecc-a26b-66ef768b7b65
Yu, Oriana HY
b269159b-dad7-4a31-bb0a-601fbc7252c3
Cho, Young Min
eaef9f52-f90f-41f0-bb7c-12335aaeda37
Lee, Bon Hyang
92026a80-bb26-4ccd-a108-aa9cc12adbf0
Chang, Yoosoo
59537bfa-bd1b-4fa8-959e-f3ea57ba9cbc
Byrne, Chris
1370b997-cead-4229-83a7-53301ed2a43c
Shin, Ju-Young
19bce74c-2aa9-483a-b6d0-67c91eb9bc9b
Bea, Sungho
931c0446-f7c1-45e2-830f-b36517d445be
Jeong, Han Eol
930f14e0-5864-44de-880d-a70e82239f40
Filion, Kristian B.
383a9590-de79-4ecc-a26b-66ef768b7b65
Yu, Oriana HY
b269159b-dad7-4a31-bb0a-601fbc7252c3
Cho, Young Min
eaef9f52-f90f-41f0-bb7c-12335aaeda37
Lee, Bon Hyang
92026a80-bb26-4ccd-a108-aa9cc12adbf0
Chang, Yoosoo
59537bfa-bd1b-4fa8-959e-f3ea57ba9cbc
Byrne, Chris
1370b997-cead-4229-83a7-53301ed2a43c
Shin, Ju-Young
19bce74c-2aa9-483a-b6d0-67c91eb9bc9b

Bea, Sungho, Jeong, Han Eol, Filion, Kristian B., Yu, Oriana HY, Cho, Young Min, Lee, Bon Hyang, Chang, Yoosoo, Byrne, Chris and Shin, Ju-Young (2023) Outcomes of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA Therapy Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Varying NAFLD Status. JAMA Network Open, 6 (12), e2349856. (doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49856).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Importance: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a cardiovascular risk factor, but whether sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) reduce cardiovascular risk in T2D patients with concomitant NAFLD remains uncertain.

Objective: to investigate the effectiveness of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA among patients with type 2 diabetes varied by the presence or absence of NAFLD.

Design: retrospective, population-based, nationwide cohort study using an active-comparator new-user design.

Setting: South Korea (January 2013 to December 2020).

Participants: two distinct new-user active-comparator cohorts of patients aged 40+ years who initiated SGLT-2i or GLP-1RA and were; propensity score matched to patients who initiated dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i). After 1:1 PS matching, 140,438 patients were retrieved in the first cohort (mean age 57.5 [SD 10.3]; male 56.7%) and 34,886 patients were identified in the second cohort (mean age 59.5 [SD10.5]; male 51.3%.

Main outcome measures: 1) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite endpoint of hospitalisation for myocardial infarction, hospitalisation for stroke, and cardiovascular death; and 2) hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR). Wald’s test was applied to assess the effect of heterogeneity by NAFLD. Data analysis was performed from October 2022 to March 2023.

Results: compared with DPP-4i, SGLT-2i were associated with a lower risk of MACE (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.71-0.85) and HHF (0.62, 95%CI 0.48-0.81). GLP-1RA were associated with a decreased risk of MACE (0.49, 95% CI 0.39-0.62) but demonstrated statistically insignificant findings regarding HHF (0.64, 95% CI 0.39-1.07). Stratified analysis by NAFLD status yielded consistent results for SGLT-2i (MACE, with NAFLD: 0.73, 95%CI 0.62-0.86 vs without NAFLD: 0.81, 95%CI 0.72-0.91; HHF, with NAFLD: 0.76, 95%CI 0.49-1.17 vs without NAFLD: 0.56, 95%CI 0.40-0.78) and for GLP-1RA (MACE, with NAFLD: 0.49, 95%CI 0.32- 0.77 vs without NAFLD: 0.49, 95%CI 0.37-0.65; HHF, with NAFLD: 0.82, 95%CI 0.38-1.76 vs without NAFLD: 0.54, 95%CI 0.27-1.06).

Conclusions and relevance: in this population-based cohort study, SGLT-2i showed a decreased risk of MACE and HHF, while GLP-1RA decreased the risk of MACE among patients with T2D irrespective of baseline NAFLD status.

Text
Figure 1_figure modified - Accepted Manuscript
Download (37kB)
Text
Figure 2_figure modified - Accepted Manuscript
Download (37kB)
Text
Figure 3_figure modified_pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (95kB)
Text
Manuscript_NAFLD_figure modified - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Supplement_1_figure modified - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

Show all 5 downloads.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 5 December 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 December 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485414
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485414
ISSN: 2574-3805
PURE UUID: a8a8f530-17a8-48f5-959f-38eacc20115b
ORCID for Chris Byrne: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6322-7753

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Dec 2023 17:36
Last modified: 08 Aug 2024 01:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sungho Bea
Author: Han Eol Jeong
Author: Kristian B. Filion
Author: Oriana HY Yu
Author: Young Min Cho
Author: Bon Hyang Lee
Author: Yoosoo Chang
Author: Chris Byrne ORCID iD
Author: Ju-Young Shin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×