The WHEAT pilot trial - withholding enteral feeds around packed red cell Transfusion to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in preterm neonates: a multicentre, electronic patient record (EPR), randomised controlled point-of-care pilot trial
The WHEAT pilot trial - withholding enteral feeds around packed red cell Transfusion to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in preterm neonates: a multicentre, electronic patient record (EPR), randomised controlled point-of-care pilot trial
Introduction: necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is a potentially devastating neonatal disease. A temporal association between red cell transfusion and NEC is well described. Observational data suggest that withholding enteral feeds around red cell transfusions may reduce the risk of NEC but this has not been tested in randomised trials; current UK practice varies. Prevention of NEC is a research priority but no appropriately powered trials have addressed this question. The use of a simplified opt-out consent model and embedding trial processes within existing electronic patient record (EPR) systems provide opportunities to increase trial efficiency and recruitment.
Methods and analysis: we will undertake a randomised, controlled, multicentre, unblinded, pilot trial comparing two care pathways: continuing milk feeds (before, during and after red cell transfusions) and withholding milk feeds (for 4 hours before, during and for 4 hours after red cell transfusions), with infants randomly assigned with equal probability. We will use opt-out consent. A nested qualitative study will explore parent and health professional views. Infants will be eligible if born at <30+0 gestational weeks+days. Primary feasibility outcomes will be rate of recruitment, opt-out, retention, compliance, data completeness and data accuracy; clinical outcomes will include mortality and NEC. The trial will recruit in two neonatal networks in England for 9 months. Data collection will continue until all infants have reached 40+0 corrected gestational weeks or neonatal discharge. Participant identification and recruitment, randomisation and all trial data collection will be embedded within existing neonatal EPR systems (BadgerNet and BadgerEPR); outcome data will be extracted from routinely recorded data held in the National Neonatal Research Database.
Ethics and dissemination: this study holds Research Ethics Committee approval to use an opt-out approach to consent. Results will inform future EPR-embedded and data-enabled trials and will be disseminated through conferences, publications and parent-centred information.
Trial registration number ISRCTN registry ISRCTN62501859; Pre-results.
blood bank & transfusion medicine, electronic patient records, neonatology, NNRD, preterm infant, randomised controlled trial
Gale, Chris
210b7c81-9a39-460a-9ab3-54fe92a69f8e
Modi, Neena
2e50ed32-b821-480f-b4af-b8669ce77e52
Jawad, Sena
af2586a2-4d29-47b4-a604-0d138d0e87e9
Culshaw, Lucy
473ba88d-5898-475a-941b-9a412518f773
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Bowler, Ursula
49570c44-66b8-4121-a220-3de7e6cf1a0d
Forster, Amanda
4352dba5-264f-4202-b74b-1b24f22514d2
King, Andy
6ef348a2-6656-4d07-9f0c-b2b631c6037d
McLeish, Jenny
0206978a-ab4e-43b1-a26f-ca9c41a8df4f
Linsell, Louise
bf220517-49cd-4fbb-8666-19d2a1de1257
Turner, Mark A.
11b94291-469c-4c90-a9e4-78f408028d0f
Robberts, Helen
62e836cc-1c40-4631-a21e-327b731ee09e
Stanbury, Kayleigh
29a78c4b-a747-4846-99c6-091dcc825543
van Staa, Tjeerd
170927fb-02d1-4d0a-889d-b9611f8fe9d7
Juszczak, Ed
a4f66edd-e590-4ba4-8aba-cc8f1fd955aa
20 September 2019
Gale, Chris
210b7c81-9a39-460a-9ab3-54fe92a69f8e
Modi, Neena
2e50ed32-b821-480f-b4af-b8669ce77e52
Jawad, Sena
af2586a2-4d29-47b4-a604-0d138d0e87e9
Culshaw, Lucy
473ba88d-5898-475a-941b-9a412518f773
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Bowler, Ursula
49570c44-66b8-4121-a220-3de7e6cf1a0d
Forster, Amanda
4352dba5-264f-4202-b74b-1b24f22514d2
King, Andy
6ef348a2-6656-4d07-9f0c-b2b631c6037d
McLeish, Jenny
0206978a-ab4e-43b1-a26f-ca9c41a8df4f
Linsell, Louise
bf220517-49cd-4fbb-8666-19d2a1de1257
Turner, Mark A.
11b94291-469c-4c90-a9e4-78f408028d0f
Robberts, Helen
62e836cc-1c40-4631-a21e-327b731ee09e
Stanbury, Kayleigh
29a78c4b-a747-4846-99c6-091dcc825543
van Staa, Tjeerd
170927fb-02d1-4d0a-889d-b9611f8fe9d7
Juszczak, Ed
a4f66edd-e590-4ba4-8aba-cc8f1fd955aa
Gale, Chris, Modi, Neena, Jawad, Sena, Culshaw, Lucy, Dorling, Jon, Bowler, Ursula, Forster, Amanda, King, Andy, McLeish, Jenny, Linsell, Louise, Turner, Mark A., Robberts, Helen, Stanbury, Kayleigh, van Staa, Tjeerd and Juszczak, Ed
(2019)
The WHEAT pilot trial - withholding enteral feeds around packed red cell Transfusion to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in preterm neonates: a multicentre, electronic patient record (EPR), randomised controlled point-of-care pilot trial.
BMJ Open, 9, [e033543].
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033543).
Abstract
Introduction: necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is a potentially devastating neonatal disease. A temporal association between red cell transfusion and NEC is well described. Observational data suggest that withholding enteral feeds around red cell transfusions may reduce the risk of NEC but this has not been tested in randomised trials; current UK practice varies. Prevention of NEC is a research priority but no appropriately powered trials have addressed this question. The use of a simplified opt-out consent model and embedding trial processes within existing electronic patient record (EPR) systems provide opportunities to increase trial efficiency and recruitment.
Methods and analysis: we will undertake a randomised, controlled, multicentre, unblinded, pilot trial comparing two care pathways: continuing milk feeds (before, during and after red cell transfusions) and withholding milk feeds (for 4 hours before, during and for 4 hours after red cell transfusions), with infants randomly assigned with equal probability. We will use opt-out consent. A nested qualitative study will explore parent and health professional views. Infants will be eligible if born at <30+0 gestational weeks+days. Primary feasibility outcomes will be rate of recruitment, opt-out, retention, compliance, data completeness and data accuracy; clinical outcomes will include mortality and NEC. The trial will recruit in two neonatal networks in England for 9 months. Data collection will continue until all infants have reached 40+0 corrected gestational weeks or neonatal discharge. Participant identification and recruitment, randomisation and all trial data collection will be embedded within existing neonatal EPR systems (BadgerNet and BadgerEPR); outcome data will be extracted from routinely recorded data held in the National Neonatal Research Database.
Ethics and dissemination: this study holds Research Ethics Committee approval to use an opt-out approach to consent. Results will inform future EPR-embedded and data-enabled trials and will be disseminated through conferences, publications and parent-centred information.
Trial registration number ISRCTN registry ISRCTN62501859; Pre-results.
Text
e033543.full
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 5 September 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 September 2019
Published date: 20 September 2019
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
Funding The trial is funded through a United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinician Scientist Fellowship awarded to CG.
Keywords:
blood bank & transfusion medicine, electronic patient records, neonatology, NNRD, preterm infant, randomised controlled trial
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 485418
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485418
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 92726c33-ef35-4c8c-b698-8489ebe36cdc
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Dec 2023 17:38
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 02:20
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Chris Gale
Author:
Neena Modi
Author:
Sena Jawad
Author:
Lucy Culshaw
Author:
Jon Dorling
Author:
Ursula Bowler
Author:
Amanda Forster
Author:
Andy King
Author:
Jenny McLeish
Author:
Louise Linsell
Author:
Mark A. Turner
Author:
Helen Robberts
Author:
Kayleigh Stanbury
Author:
Tjeerd van Staa
Author:
Ed Juszczak
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics