The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in the treatment of women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) to improve perinatal outcomes: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial (PITCHES)

Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in the treatment of women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) to improve perinatal outcomes: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial (PITCHES)
Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in the treatment of women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) to improve perinatal outcomes: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial (PITCHES)

Background: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is the most common liver disorder specific to pregnancy and presents with maternal pruritus, raised concentrations of serum bile acids and abnormal liver function tests. ICP is associated with increased rates of spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm labour, fetal hypoxia, meconium-stained amniotic fluid and intrauterine death. Some clinicians treat ICP with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) to improve maternal pruritus and biochemical abnormalities. However, there are currently no data to support the use of UDCA to improve pregnancy outcome as none of the trials performed to date have been powered to address this question. Methods: The PITCHES trial is a triple-masked, placebo-controlled randomised trial, to evaluate UDCA versus placebo in women with ICP between 20 + 0 to 40 + 6 weeks' gestation. The primary objective of the trial is to determine if UDCA treatment of women with ICP between 20 + 0 and 40 + 6 weeks' gestation reduces the primary perinatal outcome: a composite of perinatal death (as defined by in utero fetal death after randomisation or known neonatal death up to 7 days) or preterm delivery (less than 37 weeks' gestation) or neonatal unit admission for at least 4 h (from infant delivery until hospital discharge). The secondary objectives of the trial are (1) to investigate the effect of UDCA on other short-term outcomes for both mother and infant and (2) to assess the impact of UDCA on health care resource use, in terms of the total number of nights for mother and infant, together with level of care. Discussion: Current practice in the UK at the time of trial commencement for the treatment of ICP is inconsistent, with some units routinely prescribing UDCA, others prescribing very little and the remainder offering it variably. Our previous pilot trial of UDCA in women with ICP demonstrated that the trial would be feasible, and the research question remains active and unanswered. Results are highly likely to influence clinical practice, through direct management and impact on national and international guidelines. Trial registration: ISRCTN registry, ID: ISRCTN91918806. Prospectively registered on 27 August 2015.

Cholestasis, Perinatal, Pregnancy, Stillbirth, Ursodeoxycholic acid
1745-6215
Chappell, Lucy C.
43bf7847-01bc-4c93-a8b1-a63f18f3a51e
Chambers, Jenny
75c026d3-7934-4281-a50a-9f2b2e637325
Dixon, Peter H.
57197420-4a59-4992-8932-d60a38e05bd8
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Hunter, Rachael
155068d4-d49a-4180-8eb0-0c549aa7f95c
Bell, Jennifer L.
1d6aa807-f47d-4050-90e8-6774fd5ae4d7
Bowler, Ursula
49570c44-66b8-4121-a220-3de7e6cf1a0d
Hardy, Pollyanna
6a9c6df8-9e5b-4300-8fc7-03fed7b390bd
Juszczak, Edmund
9267758e-8ab8-44c7-ab14-48ef82fa6b6e
Linsell, Louise
bf220517-49cd-4fbb-8666-19d2a1de1257
Rounding, Catherine
21b05f79-8ab1-4dd7-bcd3-8363041c849d
Smith, Anne
68a16a6a-b4cd-4546-80f1-fdba0e0a0cec
Williamson, Catherine
8aff4e42-f30c-4f1e-81ce-d4e9266a5a2f
Thornton, Jim G.
9edbe61e-ce9e-4f02-9536-cedeb0257bf9
Chappell, Lucy C.
43bf7847-01bc-4c93-a8b1-a63f18f3a51e
Chambers, Jenny
75c026d3-7934-4281-a50a-9f2b2e637325
Dixon, Peter H.
57197420-4a59-4992-8932-d60a38e05bd8
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Hunter, Rachael
155068d4-d49a-4180-8eb0-0c549aa7f95c
Bell, Jennifer L.
1d6aa807-f47d-4050-90e8-6774fd5ae4d7
Bowler, Ursula
49570c44-66b8-4121-a220-3de7e6cf1a0d
Hardy, Pollyanna
6a9c6df8-9e5b-4300-8fc7-03fed7b390bd
Juszczak, Edmund
9267758e-8ab8-44c7-ab14-48ef82fa6b6e
Linsell, Louise
bf220517-49cd-4fbb-8666-19d2a1de1257
Rounding, Catherine
21b05f79-8ab1-4dd7-bcd3-8363041c849d
Smith, Anne
68a16a6a-b4cd-4546-80f1-fdba0e0a0cec
Williamson, Catherine
8aff4e42-f30c-4f1e-81ce-d4e9266a5a2f
Thornton, Jim G.
9edbe61e-ce9e-4f02-9536-cedeb0257bf9

Chappell, Lucy C., Chambers, Jenny, Dixon, Peter H., Dorling, Jon, Hunter, Rachael, Bell, Jennifer L., Bowler, Ursula, Hardy, Pollyanna, Juszczak, Edmund, Linsell, Louise, Rounding, Catherine, Smith, Anne, Williamson, Catherine and Thornton, Jim G. (2018) Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in the treatment of women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) to improve perinatal outcomes: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial (PITCHES). Trials, 19 (1), [657]. (doi:10.1186/s13063-018-3018-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is the most common liver disorder specific to pregnancy and presents with maternal pruritus, raised concentrations of serum bile acids and abnormal liver function tests. ICP is associated with increased rates of spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm labour, fetal hypoxia, meconium-stained amniotic fluid and intrauterine death. Some clinicians treat ICP with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) to improve maternal pruritus and biochemical abnormalities. However, there are currently no data to support the use of UDCA to improve pregnancy outcome as none of the trials performed to date have been powered to address this question. Methods: The PITCHES trial is a triple-masked, placebo-controlled randomised trial, to evaluate UDCA versus placebo in women with ICP between 20 + 0 to 40 + 6 weeks' gestation. The primary objective of the trial is to determine if UDCA treatment of women with ICP between 20 + 0 and 40 + 6 weeks' gestation reduces the primary perinatal outcome: a composite of perinatal death (as defined by in utero fetal death after randomisation or known neonatal death up to 7 days) or preterm delivery (less than 37 weeks' gestation) or neonatal unit admission for at least 4 h (from infant delivery until hospital discharge). The secondary objectives of the trial are (1) to investigate the effect of UDCA on other short-term outcomes for both mother and infant and (2) to assess the impact of UDCA on health care resource use, in terms of the total number of nights for mother and infant, together with level of care. Discussion: Current practice in the UK at the time of trial commencement for the treatment of ICP is inconsistent, with some units routinely prescribing UDCA, others prescribing very little and the remainder offering it variably. Our previous pilot trial of UDCA in women with ICP demonstrated that the trial would be feasible, and the research question remains active and unanswered. Results are highly likely to influence clinical practice, through direct management and impact on national and international guidelines. Trial registration: ISRCTN registry, ID: ISRCTN91918806. Prospectively registered on 27 August 2015.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 27 November 2018
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s).
Keywords: Cholestasis, Perinatal, Pregnancy, Stillbirth, Ursodeoxycholic acid

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485430
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485430
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: 13eda7f5-0d8f-435a-8378-d64155d5f3ab
ORCID for Jon Dorling: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-3221

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Dec 2023 17:39
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lucy C. Chappell
Author: Jenny Chambers
Author: Peter H. Dixon
Author: Jon Dorling ORCID iD
Author: Rachael Hunter
Author: Jennifer L. Bell
Author: Ursula Bowler
Author: Pollyanna Hardy
Author: Edmund Juszczak
Author: Louise Linsell
Author: Catherine Rounding
Author: Anne Smith
Author: Catherine Williamson
Author: Jim G. Thornton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×