The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Understanding adherence to self-isolation in the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study

Understanding adherence to self-isolation in the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study
Understanding adherence to self-isolation in the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study
Background: during the early “containment” phase of the COVID-19 response in England (January-March 2020), contact tracing was managed by Public Health England (PHE). Adherence to self-isolation during this phase and how people were making those decisions has not previously been determined. The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of decisions around adherence to self-isolation during the first phase of the COVID-19 response in England.

Methods: a mixed-methods cross sectional study was conducted, including an online survey and qualitative interviews. The overall pattern of adherence was described as never leaving home, leaving home for lower-contact reasons and leaving home for higher-contact reasons. Fisher’s exact test was used to test associations between adherence and potentially predictive binary factors. Factors showing evidence of association overall were then considered in relation to the three aspects of adherence individually. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: of 250 respondents who were advised to self-isolate, 63% reported not leaving home at all during their isolation period, 20% reported leaving only for lower-contact activities (dog walking or exercise) and 16% reported leaving for higher-contact, and therefore higher-risk, reasons. Factors associated with adherence to never going out included: the belief that following isolation advice would save lives, experiencing COVID-19 symptoms, being advised to stay in their room, having help from outside and having regular contact by text message from PHE. Factors associated with non-adherence included being angry about the advice to isolate, being unable to get groceries delivered and concerns about losing touch with friends and family. Interviews highlighted that a sense of duty motivated people to adhere to isolation guidance and where people did leave their homes, these decisions were based on rational calculations of the risk of transmission – people would only leave their homes when they thought they were unlikely to come into contact with others.

Conclusions: understanding adherence to isolation and associated reasoning during the early stages of the pandemic is essential to pandemic preparedness for future emerging infectious disease outbreaks. Individuals make complex decisions around adherence by calibrating transmission risks, therefore treating adherence as binary should be avoided.
Adherence, Behaviour, COVID-19, self-isolation, Self-isolation
1471-2458
Robin, Charlotte
86b94f73-f524-4f2d-828b-869db3646f33
Reynolds, Rosy
82952c0e-b0d0-4a5d-81f2-dfc7d0df98fd
Lambert, Helen
dc874174-bf24-4f52-bece-88ebebee4f41
Hickman, Matthew
c511c269-325e-4854-ad42-0c9b963160a8
Rubin, G.J.
4776cfa7-0040-48af-8b8d-f644ae7c27ec
Smith, Louise E.
4cfb9721-9982-4c96-b170-db664248117b
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Cai, Shenghan
bc1df924-b29c-4b3c-8e78-7211a4e231d5
Zhang, Tingting
dc40ceb4-ffc0-4457-a688-98177d239ba4
Mook, Piers
5885cb37-d1e7-4b67-8e95-614fad7ea8da
McManus, Oliver
4b886653-6206-405f-a972-dd425cfd6e5a
Lasseter, Gemma
ed36b7c6-a473-48fb-b844-7e9fc52fa897
Compston, Polly
a9c605d0-1891-4490-9734-883e08ea4ecf
Denford, Sarah
8970b5a7-8cad-4356-ad0e-88297b67db37
Zhang, Juan
1839982d-6c65-45fd-990b-7b2b8f07a90c
Amlot, Richard
b327f983-3414-49c2-aa93-c6e78f3b7bdf
Oliver, Isabel
8cd29c59-d46a-4b7f-97ee-ad66a48cf0ff
Robin, Charlotte
86b94f73-f524-4f2d-828b-869db3646f33
Reynolds, Rosy
82952c0e-b0d0-4a5d-81f2-dfc7d0df98fd
Lambert, Helen
dc874174-bf24-4f52-bece-88ebebee4f41
Hickman, Matthew
c511c269-325e-4854-ad42-0c9b963160a8
Rubin, G.J.
4776cfa7-0040-48af-8b8d-f644ae7c27ec
Smith, Louise E.
4cfb9721-9982-4c96-b170-db664248117b
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Cai, Shenghan
bc1df924-b29c-4b3c-8e78-7211a4e231d5
Zhang, Tingting
dc40ceb4-ffc0-4457-a688-98177d239ba4
Mook, Piers
5885cb37-d1e7-4b67-8e95-614fad7ea8da
McManus, Oliver
4b886653-6206-405f-a972-dd425cfd6e5a
Lasseter, Gemma
ed36b7c6-a473-48fb-b844-7e9fc52fa897
Compston, Polly
a9c605d0-1891-4490-9734-883e08ea4ecf
Denford, Sarah
8970b5a7-8cad-4356-ad0e-88297b67db37
Zhang, Juan
1839982d-6c65-45fd-990b-7b2b8f07a90c
Amlot, Richard
b327f983-3414-49c2-aa93-c6e78f3b7bdf
Oliver, Isabel
8cd29c59-d46a-4b7f-97ee-ad66a48cf0ff

Robin, Charlotte, Reynolds, Rosy, Lambert, Helen, Hickman, Matthew, Rubin, G.J., Smith, Louise E., Yardley, Lucy, Cai, Shenghan, Zhang, Tingting, Mook, Piers, McManus, Oliver, Lasseter, Gemma, Compston, Polly, Denford, Sarah, Zhang, Juan, Amlot, Richard and Oliver, Isabel (2023) Understanding adherence to self-isolation in the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study. BMC Public Health, 23 (1), [2074]. (doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16674-9).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: during the early “containment” phase of the COVID-19 response in England (January-March 2020), contact tracing was managed by Public Health England (PHE). Adherence to self-isolation during this phase and how people were making those decisions has not previously been determined. The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of decisions around adherence to self-isolation during the first phase of the COVID-19 response in England.

Methods: a mixed-methods cross sectional study was conducted, including an online survey and qualitative interviews. The overall pattern of adherence was described as never leaving home, leaving home for lower-contact reasons and leaving home for higher-contact reasons. Fisher’s exact test was used to test associations between adherence and potentially predictive binary factors. Factors showing evidence of association overall were then considered in relation to the three aspects of adherence individually. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: of 250 respondents who were advised to self-isolate, 63% reported not leaving home at all during their isolation period, 20% reported leaving only for lower-contact activities (dog walking or exercise) and 16% reported leaving for higher-contact, and therefore higher-risk, reasons. Factors associated with adherence to never going out included: the belief that following isolation advice would save lives, experiencing COVID-19 symptoms, being advised to stay in their room, having help from outside and having regular contact by text message from PHE. Factors associated with non-adherence included being angry about the advice to isolate, being unable to get groceries delivered and concerns about losing touch with friends and family. Interviews highlighted that a sense of duty motivated people to adhere to isolation guidance and where people did leave their homes, these decisions were based on rational calculations of the risk of transmission – people would only leave their homes when they thought they were unlikely to come into contact with others.

Conclusions: understanding adherence to isolation and associated reasoning during the early stages of the pandemic is essential to pandemic preparedness for future emerging infectious disease outbreaks. Individuals make complex decisions around adherence by calibrating transmission risks, therefore treating adherence as binary should be avoided.

Text
ROBIN 2023 BMC PUBLIC HEALTH - Understanding adherence to self isolation - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 August 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 October 2023
Published date: 23 October 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: L.Y. is an NIHR Senior Investigator and her research programme is partly supported by NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC)-West, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, and the NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). Funding Information: CR is supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at the University of Liverpool in partnership with UKHSA in collaboration with the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and The University of Oxford, the NIHR HPRU in Gastrointestinal Infections at the University of Liverpool in partnership with UKHSA, in collaboration with the University of Warwick and the NIHR HPRU in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol, in partnership with UKHSA. C.R. is based at UKHSA. Funding Information: LY is an NIHR Senior Investigator and her research programme is partly supported by NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC)-West, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) for Behavioural Science and Evaluation, and the NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). Funding Information: This work was funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)/Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) COVID-19 Rapid Response Call 2 [MC_PC 19071] and supported by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol, in partnership with UK Health Security Agency (UK HSA; previously Public Health England). Funding Information: The authors would like to express their gratitude to all the participants who shared their experiences of self-isolation. C.R., R.R., G.L., P.C., H.L., M.H., S.D., L.Y., R.A., and I.O. are supported by the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol in partnership with UK Health Security Agency (UK HSA). L.S., J.R. and R.A. are supported by the NIHR HPRU in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King’s College London in partnership with UK HSA. L.Y. is an NIHR Senior Investigator and her research programme is partly supported by NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC)-West, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, and the NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). C.R. is affiliated to the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at the University of Liverpool in partnership with UK HSA in collaboration with the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and The University of Oxford, the NIHR HPRU in Gastrointestinal Infections at the University of Liverpool in partnership with UK HSA, in collaboration with the University of Warwick and the NIHR HPRU in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol, in partnership with UK HSA. C.R. is based at UK HSA. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care or UK HSA. The funders had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, or in writing the manuscript. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Keywords: Adherence, Behaviour, COVID-19, self-isolation, Self-isolation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485540
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485540
ISSN: 1471-2458
PURE UUID: 0e81cec2-5437-4a6c-afed-667188b06a11
ORCID for Lucy Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Dec 2023 17:43
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:50

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Charlotte Robin
Author: Rosy Reynolds
Author: Helen Lambert
Author: Matthew Hickman
Author: G.J. Rubin
Author: Louise E. Smith
Author: Lucy Yardley ORCID iD
Author: Shenghan Cai
Author: Tingting Zhang
Author: Piers Mook
Author: Oliver McManus
Author: Gemma Lasseter
Author: Polly Compston
Author: Sarah Denford
Author: Juan Zhang
Author: Richard Amlot
Author: Isabel Oliver

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×