Ioannidis, John P.A. and Maniadis, Zacharias (2023) In defense of quantitative metrics in researcher assessments. PLoS Biology, 21 (12), e3002408, [e3002408]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002408).
Record type:
Review
Abstract
Qualitative assessments of researchers are resource-intensive, untenable in non-meritocratic settings and error-prone. Although often derided, quantitative metrics could help improve research practices if they are rigorous, field-adjusted, and centralized.
Text
In Defence of Quantitative Metrics
- Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (155kB)
Text
journal.pbio.3002408
- Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (298kB)
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 30 October 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 December 2023
Published date: December 2023
Additional Information:
Copyright: © 2023 Ioannidis, Maniadis. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 485667
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485667
ISSN: 1544-9173
PURE UUID: 0098f5fc-21d8-446d-991d-711167a9ebf5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Dec 2023 17:40
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:22
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
John P.A. Ioannidis
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.