The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Fracture prediction in rheumatoid arthritis: validation of FRAX with bone mineral density for incident major osteoporotic fractures

Fracture prediction in rheumatoid arthritis: validation of FRAX with bone mineral density for incident major osteoporotic fractures
Fracture prediction in rheumatoid arthritis: validation of FRAX with bone mineral density for incident major osteoporotic fractures

Objectives: FRAX® uses clinical risk factors, with or without bone mineral density (BMD), to calculate 10-year fracture risk. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a risk factor for osteoporotic fracture and a FRAX input variable. FRAX predates the current era of RA treatment. We examined how well FRAX predicts fracture in contemporary RA patients.

Methods: administrative data from patients receiving BMD testing were linked to the Manitoba Population Health Research Data Repository. Observed cumulative 10-year Major Osteoporotic Fracture (MOF) probability was compared with FRAX-predicted 10-year MOF probability with BMD for assessing calibration. MOF risk stratification was assessed using Cox regression.

Results: RA patients (N = 2,099, 208 with incident MOF) and non-RA patients (N = 2,099, with 165 incident MOF) were identified. For RA patients, FRAX predicted 10-year risk was 13.2% and observed 10-year MOF risk was 13.2% (95% CI 11.6% to 15.1%). The slope of the calibration plot was 0.67 (95% CI 0.53-0. 81) in those with RA vs 0.98 (95% CI 0.61-1.34) in non-RA patients. Risk was overestimated in RA patients with high FRAX scores (>20%), but FRAX was well-calibrated in other groups. FRAX stratified risk in those with and without RA (hazard ratios 1.52, 95% 1.25-1.72 vs 2.00, 95% 1.73-2.31), with slightly better performance in the latter (p-interaction = 0.004).

Conclusions: FRAX predicts fracture risk in contemporary RA patients but may slightly overestimate risk in those already at high predicted risk. Thus, the current FRAX tool continues to be appropriate for fracture risk assessment in RA patients.

1462-0324
Richards, Ceri
89008087-1395-4029-9e6e-dc0254e7c38e
Stevens, Richard
da22c605-115b-4fa5-acad-75917c7829ca
Lix, Lisa M.
2fb61783-047d-4a4b-a45d-e09ac0763a7b
McCloskey, Eugene V.
2f057a16-3d4e-4597-80c7-6ce47f969c78
Johansson, Helena
04f12338-4dd1-437b-b9bc-e0884130c215
Harvey, Nicholas C.
ce487fb4-d360-4aac-9d17-9466d6cba145
Kanis, John A.
f1621d8d-8afb-4d97-9679-2165d88a344d
Leslie, William D.
5b2dd5d6-4569-40a3-a9b1-95152d11e4f1
Richards, Ceri
89008087-1395-4029-9e6e-dc0254e7c38e
Stevens, Richard
da22c605-115b-4fa5-acad-75917c7829ca
Lix, Lisa M.
2fb61783-047d-4a4b-a45d-e09ac0763a7b
McCloskey, Eugene V.
2f057a16-3d4e-4597-80c7-6ce47f969c78
Johansson, Helena
04f12338-4dd1-437b-b9bc-e0884130c215
Harvey, Nicholas C.
ce487fb4-d360-4aac-9d17-9466d6cba145
Kanis, John A.
f1621d8d-8afb-4d97-9679-2165d88a344d
Leslie, William D.
5b2dd5d6-4569-40a3-a9b1-95152d11e4f1

Richards, Ceri, Stevens, Richard, Lix, Lisa M., McCloskey, Eugene V., Johansson, Helena, Harvey, Nicholas C., Kanis, John A. and Leslie, William D. (2023) Fracture prediction in rheumatoid arthritis: validation of FRAX with bone mineral density for incident major osteoporotic fractures. Rheumatology (Oxford, England), [kead676]. (doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kead676).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: FRAX® uses clinical risk factors, with or without bone mineral density (BMD), to calculate 10-year fracture risk. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a risk factor for osteoporotic fracture and a FRAX input variable. FRAX predates the current era of RA treatment. We examined how well FRAX predicts fracture in contemporary RA patients.

Methods: administrative data from patients receiving BMD testing were linked to the Manitoba Population Health Research Data Repository. Observed cumulative 10-year Major Osteoporotic Fracture (MOF) probability was compared with FRAX-predicted 10-year MOF probability with BMD for assessing calibration. MOF risk stratification was assessed using Cox regression.

Results: RA patients (N = 2,099, 208 with incident MOF) and non-RA patients (N = 2,099, with 165 incident MOF) were identified. For RA patients, FRAX predicted 10-year risk was 13.2% and observed 10-year MOF risk was 13.2% (95% CI 11.6% to 15.1%). The slope of the calibration plot was 0.67 (95% CI 0.53-0. 81) in those with RA vs 0.98 (95% CI 0.61-1.34) in non-RA patients. Risk was overestimated in RA patients with high FRAX scores (>20%), but FRAX was well-calibrated in other groups. FRAX stratified risk in those with and without RA (hazard ratios 1.52, 95% 1.25-1.72 vs 2.00, 95% 1.73-2.31), with slightly better performance in the latter (p-interaction = 0.004).

Conclusions: FRAX predicts fracture risk in contemporary RA patients but may slightly overestimate risk in those already at high predicted risk. Thus, the current FRAX tool continues to be appropriate for fracture risk assessment in RA patients.

Text
kead676 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 12 December 2024.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 19 November 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 December 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485711
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485711
ISSN: 1462-0324
PURE UUID: 4f1cadda-7d05-4923-9021-0547388d2851
ORCID for Nicholas C. Harvey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-2512

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Dec 2023 17:32
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ceri Richards
Author: Richard Stevens
Author: Lisa M. Lix
Author: Eugene V. McCloskey
Author: Helena Johansson
Author: John A. Kanis
Author: William D. Leslie

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×