The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Association of assisted reproductive technology with offspring growth and adiposity from infancy to early adulthood

Association of assisted reproductive technology with offspring growth and adiposity from infancy to early adulthood
Association of assisted reproductive technology with offspring growth and adiposity from infancy to early adulthood

Importance: people conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART) make up an increasing proportion of the world's population.

Objective: to investigate the association of ART conception with offspring growth and adiposity from infancy to early adulthood in a large multicohort study.

Design, setting, and participants: this cohort study used a prespecified coordinated analysis across 26 European, Asia-Pacific, and North American population-based cohort studies that included people born between 1984 and 2018, with mean ages at assessment of growth and adiposity outcomes from 0.6 months to 27.4 years. Data were analyzed between November 2019 and February 2022.

Exposures: conception by ART (mostly in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and embryo transfer) vs natural conception (NC; without any medically assisted reproduction).

Main outcomes and measures: the main outcomes were length / height, weight, and body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). Each cohort was analyzed separately with adjustment for maternal BMI, age, smoking, education, parity, and ethnicity and offspring sex and age. Results were combined in random effects meta-analysis for 13 age groups.

Results: up to 158 066 offspring (4329 conceived by ART) were included in each age-group meta-analysis, with between 47.6% to 60.6% females in each cohort. Compared with offspring who were NC, offspring conceived via ART were shorter, lighter, and thinner from infancy to early adolescence, with differences largest at the youngest ages and attenuating with older child age. For example, adjusted mean differences in offspring weight were -0.27 (95% CI, -0.39 to -0.16) SD units at age younger than 3 months, -0.16 (95% CI, -0.22 to -0.09) SD units at age 17 to 23 months, -0.07 (95% CI, -0.10 to -0.04) SD units at age 6 to 9 years, and -0.02 (95% CI, -0.15 to 0.12) SD units at age 14 to 17 years. Smaller offspring size was limited to individuals conceived by fresh but not frozen embryo transfer compared with those who were NC (eg, difference in weight at age 4 to 5 years was -0.14 [95% CI, -0.20 to -0.07] SD units for fresh embryo transfer vs NC and 0.00 [95% CI, -0.15 to 0.15] SD units for frozen embryo transfer vs NC). More marked differences were seen for body fat measurements, and there was imprecise evidence that offspring conceived by ART developed greater adiposity by early adulthood (eg, ART vs NC difference in fat mass index at age older than 17 years: 0.23 [95% CI, -0.04 to 0.50] SD units).

Conclusions and relevance: these findings suggest that people conceiving or conceived by ART can be reassured that differences in early growth and adiposity are small and no longer evident by late adolescence.

Adiposity, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Cohort Studies, Embryo Transfer/methods, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Obesity/epidemiology, Pregnancy, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/adverse effects, Semen
2574-3805
Elhakeem, Ahmed
f9bced1c-9287-4a5e-b892-17998dc6ac88
Taylor, Amy E.
9ab6dbee-bc82-4076-85e4-1c23cdeb0383
Inskip, Hazel M.
5fb4470a-9379-49b2-a533-9da8e61058b7
Salika, Theodosia
2d7e134c-1e7b-4d5d-b69e-bc1447daf02e
et al.
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Future Health (ART-Health) Cohort Collaboration
Elhakeem, Ahmed
f9bced1c-9287-4a5e-b892-17998dc6ac88
Taylor, Amy E.
9ab6dbee-bc82-4076-85e4-1c23cdeb0383
Inskip, Hazel M.
5fb4470a-9379-49b2-a533-9da8e61058b7
Salika, Theodosia
2d7e134c-1e7b-4d5d-b69e-bc1447daf02e

Elhakeem, Ahmed, Taylor, Amy E. and Inskip, Hazel M. , et al. and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Future Health (ART-Health) Cohort Collaboration (2022) Association of assisted reproductive technology with offspring growth and adiposity from infancy to early adulthood. JAMA Network Open, 5 (7), [e2222106]. (doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22106).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Importance: people conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART) make up an increasing proportion of the world's population.

Objective: to investigate the association of ART conception with offspring growth and adiposity from infancy to early adulthood in a large multicohort study.

Design, setting, and participants: this cohort study used a prespecified coordinated analysis across 26 European, Asia-Pacific, and North American population-based cohort studies that included people born between 1984 and 2018, with mean ages at assessment of growth and adiposity outcomes from 0.6 months to 27.4 years. Data were analyzed between November 2019 and February 2022.

Exposures: conception by ART (mostly in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and embryo transfer) vs natural conception (NC; without any medically assisted reproduction).

Main outcomes and measures: the main outcomes were length / height, weight, and body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). Each cohort was analyzed separately with adjustment for maternal BMI, age, smoking, education, parity, and ethnicity and offspring sex and age. Results were combined in random effects meta-analysis for 13 age groups.

Results: up to 158 066 offspring (4329 conceived by ART) were included in each age-group meta-analysis, with between 47.6% to 60.6% females in each cohort. Compared with offspring who were NC, offspring conceived via ART were shorter, lighter, and thinner from infancy to early adolescence, with differences largest at the youngest ages and attenuating with older child age. For example, adjusted mean differences in offspring weight were -0.27 (95% CI, -0.39 to -0.16) SD units at age younger than 3 months, -0.16 (95% CI, -0.22 to -0.09) SD units at age 17 to 23 months, -0.07 (95% CI, -0.10 to -0.04) SD units at age 6 to 9 years, and -0.02 (95% CI, -0.15 to 0.12) SD units at age 14 to 17 years. Smaller offspring size was limited to individuals conceived by fresh but not frozen embryo transfer compared with those who were NC (eg, difference in weight at age 4 to 5 years was -0.14 [95% CI, -0.20 to -0.07] SD units for fresh embryo transfer vs NC and 0.00 [95% CI, -0.15 to 0.15] SD units for frozen embryo transfer vs NC). More marked differences were seen for body fat measurements, and there was imprecise evidence that offspring conceived by ART developed greater adiposity by early adulthood (eg, ART vs NC difference in fat mass index at age older than 17 years: 0.23 [95% CI, -0.04 to 0.50] SD units).

Conclusions and relevance: these findings suggest that people conceiving or conceived by ART can be reassured that differences in early growth and adiposity are small and no longer evident by late adolescence.

Text
elhakeem_2022_oi_220627_1658244632.68606 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 May 2022
Published date: 26 July 2022
Keywords: Adiposity, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Cohort Studies, Embryo Transfer/methods, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Obesity/epidemiology, Pregnancy, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/adverse effects, Semen

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485803
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485803
ISSN: 2574-3805
PURE UUID: d45c1d58-eddb-4ddc-a175-d2528674db2a
ORCID for Hazel M. Inskip: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8897-1749

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Dec 2023 17:54
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ahmed Elhakeem
Author: Amy E. Taylor
Author: Hazel M. Inskip ORCID iD
Author: Theodosia Salika
Corporate Author: et al.
Corporate Author: Assisted Reproductive Technology and Future Health (ART-Health) Cohort Collaboration

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×