On repeated diagnostic testing in screening for a medical condition: how often should the diagnostic test be repeated?
On repeated diagnostic testing in screening for a medical condition: how often should the diagnostic test be repeated?
In screening large populations a diagnostic test is frequently used repeatedly. An example is screening for bowel cancer using the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) on several occasions such as at three or six days. The question that is addressed here is how often should we repeat a diagnostic test when screening for a specific medical condition? Sensitivity is often used as a performance measure of a diagnostic test and is considered here for the individual application of the diagnostic test as well as for the overall screening procedure. The latter can involve an increasingly large number of repeated applications, but how many are sufficient? We demonstrate the issues involved in answering this question using real data on bowel cancer at St Vincents Hospital in Sydney. As data are only available for those testing positive at least once, an appropriate modeling technique is developed on the basis of the zero-truncated binomial distribution which allows for population heterogeneity. The latter is modeled using discrete nonparametric maximum likelihood. If we wish to achieve an overall sensitivity of 90%, the FOBT should be repeated for two weeks instead of the one week that was used at the time of the survey. A simulation study also shows consistency in the sense that bias and standard deviation for the estimated sensitivity decrease with increasing number of repeated occasions as well as with increasing sample size.
Sangnawakij, Patarawan
f37368bb-b1a1-4350-884c-bedfce646e1b
Böhning, Dankmar
1df635d4-e3dc-44d0-b61d-5fd11f6434e1
Sangnawakij, Patarawan
f37368bb-b1a1-4350-884c-bedfce646e1b
Böhning, Dankmar
1df635d4-e3dc-44d0-b61d-5fd11f6434e1
Sangnawakij, Patarawan and Böhning, Dankmar
(2023)
On repeated diagnostic testing in screening for a medical condition: how often should the diagnostic test be repeated?
Biometrical Journal.
(In Press)
Abstract
In screening large populations a diagnostic test is frequently used repeatedly. An example is screening for bowel cancer using the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) on several occasions such as at three or six days. The question that is addressed here is how often should we repeat a diagnostic test when screening for a specific medical condition? Sensitivity is often used as a performance measure of a diagnostic test and is considered here for the individual application of the diagnostic test as well as for the overall screening procedure. The latter can involve an increasingly large number of repeated applications, but how many are sufficient? We demonstrate the issues involved in answering this question using real data on bowel cancer at St Vincents Hospital in Sydney. As data are only available for those testing positive at least once, an appropriate modeling technique is developed on the basis of the zero-truncated binomial distribution which allows for population heterogeneity. The latter is modeled using discrete nonparametric maximum likelihood. If we wish to achieve an overall sensitivity of 90%, the FOBT should be repeated for two weeks instead of the one week that was used at the time of the survey. A simulation study also shows consistency in the sense that bias and standard deviation for the estimated sensitivity decrease with increasing number of repeated occasions as well as with increasing sample size.
Text
BinomMix_DiagTest_R2
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 21 December 2024.
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 21 December 2023
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 485872
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485872
ISSN: 0323-3847
PURE UUID: 998a709a-b6cf-4a51-88f3-91cb0e457239
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Jan 2024 19:29
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:19
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Patarawan Sangnawakij
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics