The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Preconception health and care policies, strategies and guidelines in the UK and Ireland: a scoping review

Preconception health and care policies, strategies and guidelines in the UK and Ireland: a scoping review
Preconception health and care policies, strategies and guidelines in the UK and Ireland: a scoping review

Background: preconception health has the potential to improve parental, pregnancy and infant outcomes. This scoping review aims to (1) provide an overview of the strategies, policies, guidelines, frameworks, and recommendations available in the UK and Ireland that address preconception health and care, identifying common approaches and health-influencing factors that are targeted; and (2) conduct an audit to explore the awareness and use of resources found in the scoping review amongst healthcare professionals, to validate and contextualise findings relevant to Northern Ireland.

Methods: grey literature resources were identified through Google Advanced Search, NICE, OpenAire, ProQuest and relevant public health and government websites. Resources were included if published, reviewed, or updated between January 2011 and May 2022. Data were extracted into Excel and coded using NVivo. The review design included the involvement of the "Healthy Reproductive Years" Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement advisory panel.

Results: the searches identified 273 resources, and a subsequent audit with healthcare professionals in Northern Ireland revealed five additional preconception health-related resources. A wide range of resource types were identified, and preconception health was often not the only focus of the resources reviewed. Resources proposed approaches to improve preconception health and care, such as the need for improved awareness and access to care, preconceptual counselling, multidisciplinary collaborations, and the adoption of a life-course approach. Many behavioural (e.g., folic acid intake, smoking), biomedical (e.g., mental and physical health conditions), and environmental and social (e.g., deprivation) factors were identified and addressed in the resources reviewed. In particular, pre-existing physical health conditions were frequently mentioned, with fewer resources addressing psychological factors and mental health. Overall, there was a greater focus on women's, rather than men's, behaviours.

Conclusions: this scoping review synthesised existing resources available in the UK and Ireland to identify a wide range of common approaches and factors that influence preconception health and care. Efforts are needed to implement the identified resources (e.g., strategies, guidelines) to support people of childbearing age to access preconception care and optimise their preconception health.

Female, Health Policy, Humans, Ireland, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Preconception Care/standards, Pregnancy, United Kingdom, Preconception health, Grey literature, Preconception care, Audit, Scoping review, Healthcare, Content analysis, Pre-pregnancy
1471-2458
Cassinelli, Emma H.
47d678ac-1655-4ca3-91e5-3cec8ec4cc29
McKinley, Michelle C.
3d6bc430-60d9-4c10-903c-4dabbec4317f
Kent, Lisa
ea2bd8ea-c947-440c-afdb-bc0c944cefec
Eastwood, Kelly-Ann
afd0bb6a-7f67-4e5d-878d-58b782cf96a9
Schoenaker, Danielle A.J.M.
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
Trew, David
d3bcc730-4f0c-42e1-9e7e-310aa3b392e6
Stoikidou, Theano
54b5a9b1-b720-4431-a403-329c929af1d0
McGowan, Laura
af0884a3-c82d-4710-8c1d-0db49e9b0ec7
Cassinelli, Emma H.
47d678ac-1655-4ca3-91e5-3cec8ec4cc29
McKinley, Michelle C.
3d6bc430-60d9-4c10-903c-4dabbec4317f
Kent, Lisa
ea2bd8ea-c947-440c-afdb-bc0c944cefec
Eastwood, Kelly-Ann
afd0bb6a-7f67-4e5d-878d-58b782cf96a9
Schoenaker, Danielle A.J.M.
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
Trew, David
d3bcc730-4f0c-42e1-9e7e-310aa3b392e6
Stoikidou, Theano
54b5a9b1-b720-4431-a403-329c929af1d0
McGowan, Laura
af0884a3-c82d-4710-8c1d-0db49e9b0ec7

Cassinelli, Emma H., McKinley, Michelle C., Kent, Lisa, Eastwood, Kelly-Ann, Schoenaker, Danielle A.J.M., Trew, David, Stoikidou, Theano and McGowan, Laura (2024) Preconception health and care policies, strategies and guidelines in the UK and Ireland: a scoping review. BMC Public Health, 24 (1), [1662]. (doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3787681/v1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: preconception health has the potential to improve parental, pregnancy and infant outcomes. This scoping review aims to (1) provide an overview of the strategies, policies, guidelines, frameworks, and recommendations available in the UK and Ireland that address preconception health and care, identifying common approaches and health-influencing factors that are targeted; and (2) conduct an audit to explore the awareness and use of resources found in the scoping review amongst healthcare professionals, to validate and contextualise findings relevant to Northern Ireland.

Methods: grey literature resources were identified through Google Advanced Search, NICE, OpenAire, ProQuest and relevant public health and government websites. Resources were included if published, reviewed, or updated between January 2011 and May 2022. Data were extracted into Excel and coded using NVivo. The review design included the involvement of the "Healthy Reproductive Years" Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement advisory panel.

Results: the searches identified 273 resources, and a subsequent audit with healthcare professionals in Northern Ireland revealed five additional preconception health-related resources. A wide range of resource types were identified, and preconception health was often not the only focus of the resources reviewed. Resources proposed approaches to improve preconception health and care, such as the need for improved awareness and access to care, preconceptual counselling, multidisciplinary collaborations, and the adoption of a life-course approach. Many behavioural (e.g., folic acid intake, smoking), biomedical (e.g., mental and physical health conditions), and environmental and social (e.g., deprivation) factors were identified and addressed in the resources reviewed. In particular, pre-existing physical health conditions were frequently mentioned, with fewer resources addressing psychological factors and mental health. Overall, there was a greater focus on women's, rather than men's, behaviours.

Conclusions: this scoping review synthesised existing resources available in the UK and Ireland to identify a wide range of common approaches and factors that influence preconception health and care. Efforts are needed to implement the identified resources (e.g., strategies, guidelines) to support people of childbearing age to access preconception care and optimise their preconception health.

Text
021ccb77-d378-4dc7-a56e-6f65e0f08b0d - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (794kB)
Text
s12889-024-19188-0 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 June 2024
Published date: 22 June 2024
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.
Keywords: Female, Health Policy, Humans, Ireland, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Preconception Care/standards, Pregnancy, United Kingdom, Preconception health, Grey literature, Preconception care, Audit, Scoping review, Healthcare, Content analysis, Pre-pregnancy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485921
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485921
ISSN: 1471-2458
PURE UUID: a3086814-bb15-4426-ab80-4412a5f597ba
ORCID for Danielle A.J.M. Schoenaker: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7652-990X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jan 2024 04:28
Last modified: 13 Aug 2024 01:58

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Emma H. Cassinelli
Author: Michelle C. McKinley
Author: Lisa Kent
Author: Kelly-Ann Eastwood
Author: David Trew
Author: Theano Stoikidou
Author: Laura McGowan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×