Assessment of the estuarine shoreline microplastics and mesoplastics of the River Itchen, Southampton (UK) for contaminants and for their interaction with invertebrate fauna
Assessment of the estuarine shoreline microplastics and mesoplastics of the River Itchen, Southampton (UK) for contaminants and for their interaction with invertebrate fauna
The presence of shoreline microplastics (1–5 mm) and mesoplastics (5–25 mm) in estuarine ecosystems is ubiquitous, but there remains little data on their composition, contamination status and ecological impacts. Chessel Bay Nature Reserve, situated in the internationally protected Itchen Estuary in Southampton, UK, has serious issues with shoreline plastic accumulation. In evaluating potentially adverse ecological impacts, the influence of quantities of shoreline microplastic (mp) and mesoplastic (MeP) material and adsorbed contaminants (PAHs and trace metals) on the biometrics and population dynamics of the burrowing supralittoral amphipod, Orchestia gammarellus, was assessed in this study. mp/MeP concentrations were variable in surface (0–42%: 0–422,640 mg/kg dry sediment) and subsurface horizons (0.001–10%: 11—97,797 mg/kg dry sediment). Secondary microplastics accounted for 77% of the total microplastic load (dominated by fragments and foams), but also comprised 23% nurdles/pellets (primary microplastics). Sorption mechanisms between contaminants and natural sediments were proposed to be the main contributor to the retention of PAHs and trace metal contaminants and less so, by mp/MeP. O. gammarellus populations showed a positive correlation with microplastic concentrations (Spearman correlation, R = 0.665, p = 0.036). Some reported toxicological thresholds were exceeded in sediments, but no impacts related to chemical contaminant concentrations were demonstrated. This study highlights a protected site with the severe plastic contamination, and the difficulty in demonstrating in situ ecotoxicological impacts.
6437-6459
Rose, Deanna L.G.
d031f240-cbcb-45c0-bb1d-bd6bdccbfa37
Hudson, Malcolm D.
1ae18506-6f2a-48af-8c72-83ab28679f55
Bray, Sargent
4075cb9d-6fc2-403f-8a94-df1a4e3196e4
Gaca, Pawel
3d23473d-db81-436a-a12d-ad707db4abc8
27 December 2023
Rose, Deanna L.G.
d031f240-cbcb-45c0-bb1d-bd6bdccbfa37
Hudson, Malcolm D.
1ae18506-6f2a-48af-8c72-83ab28679f55
Bray, Sargent
4075cb9d-6fc2-403f-8a94-df1a4e3196e4
Gaca, Pawel
3d23473d-db81-436a-a12d-ad707db4abc8
Rose, Deanna L.G., Hudson, Malcolm D., Bray, Sargent and Gaca, Pawel
(2023)
Assessment of the estuarine shoreline microplastics and mesoplastics of the River Itchen, Southampton (UK) for contaminants and for their interaction with invertebrate fauna.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31 (4), .
(doi:10.1007/s11356-023-31396-6).
Abstract
The presence of shoreline microplastics (1–5 mm) and mesoplastics (5–25 mm) in estuarine ecosystems is ubiquitous, but there remains little data on their composition, contamination status and ecological impacts. Chessel Bay Nature Reserve, situated in the internationally protected Itchen Estuary in Southampton, UK, has serious issues with shoreline plastic accumulation. In evaluating potentially adverse ecological impacts, the influence of quantities of shoreline microplastic (mp) and mesoplastic (MeP) material and adsorbed contaminants (PAHs and trace metals) on the biometrics and population dynamics of the burrowing supralittoral amphipod, Orchestia gammarellus, was assessed in this study. mp/MeP concentrations were variable in surface (0–42%: 0–422,640 mg/kg dry sediment) and subsurface horizons (0.001–10%: 11—97,797 mg/kg dry sediment). Secondary microplastics accounted for 77% of the total microplastic load (dominated by fragments and foams), but also comprised 23% nurdles/pellets (primary microplastics). Sorption mechanisms between contaminants and natural sediments were proposed to be the main contributor to the retention of PAHs and trace metal contaminants and less so, by mp/MeP. O. gammarellus populations showed a positive correlation with microplastic concentrations (Spearman correlation, R = 0.665, p = 0.036). Some reported toxicological thresholds were exceeded in sediments, but no impacts related to chemical contaminant concentrations were demonstrated. This study highlights a protected site with the severe plastic contamination, and the difficulty in demonstrating in situ ecotoxicological impacts.
Text
s11356-023-31396-6
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2 December 2023
Published date: 27 December 2023
Additional Information:
© 2023. The Author(s).
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 485987
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485987
ISSN: 0944-1344
PURE UUID: 39d0de30-a209-4fcc-93ba-6d98ad751aa1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jan 2024 19:12
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:41
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Deanna L.G. Rose
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics