Efficiency and novelty of using environmental swabs for dry surface biofilm recovery
Efficiency and novelty of using environmental swabs for dry surface biofilm recovery
Studies on the epidemiology of dry surface biofilms within healthcare has shown an almost universal distribution across frequently touched items. Despite a growing body of evidence for dry surface biofilms in hospitals little attention has been paid to the recovery capacity of techniques used to detect these microbial communities. Biofilms are inherently difficult to remove from surfaces due to adhesive substances within their matrix and may act as sources of infection but to what extent is largely unknown. In this study we evaluate the recovery efficiencies of commonly used environmental swabs against dry surface biofilms containing 7.24-Log10 Acinetobacter baumannii/cm2, using a drip flow reactor and desiccation cycle. Biofilm presence was visually confirmed using episcopic differential interference contrast microscopy combined with epifluorescence and quantified using sonicated viable plate counts. The swab materials used comprised of foam, viscose and cotton, all of which were pre-moistened using a buffer solution. The surfaces were vigorously swabbed by each material type and the resultant microbe populations for both swabs and remaining dry surface biofilms were quantified. Our results found foam tipped swabs to be superior, detecting on average 30% of the original dry surface biofilm contamination; followed by viscose (6%) and cotton (3%). However, no distinct difference was revealed in the concentration of microbes remaining on the surface after swabbing for each swab type suggesting there is variation in the capacity for each swab to release biofilm associated microorganisms. We conclude whilst environmental swabs do possess the ability to detect biofilms on dry surfaces; the reduced efficiencies are likely to cause an underestimation of the microbes present and should be considered during clinical application.
Watson, Fergus
c4c3927e-47bf-4448-a0c2-13a767e28ad8
Wilks, Sandra
86c1f41a-12b3-451c-9245-b1a21775e993
Chewins, John
07e26e61-1058-4872-8c54-500a0c4b3c26
Keevil, Bill
cb7de0a7-ce33-4cfa-af52-07f99e5650eb
Watson, Fergus
c4c3927e-47bf-4448-a0c2-13a767e28ad8
Wilks, Sandra
86c1f41a-12b3-451c-9245-b1a21775e993
Chewins, John
07e26e61-1058-4872-8c54-500a0c4b3c26
Keevil, Bill
cb7de0a7-ce33-4cfa-af52-07f99e5650eb
Watson, Fergus, Wilks, Sandra, Chewins, John and Keevil, Bill
(2024)
Efficiency and novelty of using environmental swabs for dry surface biofilm recovery.
Access Microbiology.
(doi:10.1099/acmi.0.000664.v3).
Abstract
Studies on the epidemiology of dry surface biofilms within healthcare has shown an almost universal distribution across frequently touched items. Despite a growing body of evidence for dry surface biofilms in hospitals little attention has been paid to the recovery capacity of techniques used to detect these microbial communities. Biofilms are inherently difficult to remove from surfaces due to adhesive substances within their matrix and may act as sources of infection but to what extent is largely unknown. In this study we evaluate the recovery efficiencies of commonly used environmental swabs against dry surface biofilms containing 7.24-Log10 Acinetobacter baumannii/cm2, using a drip flow reactor and desiccation cycle. Biofilm presence was visually confirmed using episcopic differential interference contrast microscopy combined with epifluorescence and quantified using sonicated viable plate counts. The swab materials used comprised of foam, viscose and cotton, all of which were pre-moistened using a buffer solution. The surfaces were vigorously swabbed by each material type and the resultant microbe populations for both swabs and remaining dry surface biofilms were quantified. Our results found foam tipped swabs to be superior, detecting on average 30% of the original dry surface biofilm contamination; followed by viscose (6%) and cotton (3%). However, no distinct difference was revealed in the concentration of microbes remaining on the surface after swabbing for each swab type suggesting there is variation in the capacity for each swab to release biofilm associated microorganisms. We conclude whilst environmental swabs do possess the ability to detect biofilms on dry surfaces; the reduced efficiencies are likely to cause an underestimation of the microbes present and should be considered during clinical application.
Text
acmi.0.000664.v3 (1)
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 3 January 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 January 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 486132
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486132
PURE UUID: 7c2d81d4-634e-4974-b43a-aa5ee560ab3b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Jan 2024 17:40
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:54
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
John Chewins
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics